Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beck-
with, 129 U. S. 26 (32:
585.

.554, 555, 861 v. Emmons, 149 U. S. 364 (37:

769). Minnesota v. Barber, 136 U. S. 313 (34: 455) 3 Inters. Com. Rep. 185..53, 196, 325, 331, 332 1087 Minturn v. Larue, 23 How. 435 (16: 574).

876

1149

..71, 349

769

526

1180

Wall. 511 (19: 997)...... v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177 (18: 381) Missouri v. Andriano, 138 U. S. 496 (34: 1012).

v. Lewis, 101 Ú. S. 22 (25: 989)

S. 138 (30: 895).......673, 857 Mississippi & M. R. Co. v. McClure, 10 Mercantile Mut. Ins. Co. v. Folsom [1873] 18 Wall. 237 (21: 827). Mercer's Lessee v. Selden, 1 How. 37 (11:38) Merchants' Mfg. Co. v. Grand Trunk R. Co. 13 Fed. Rep. 358. .572, 5/5 Mercharts' Nat. Bank v. State Nat. Bank, 10 Wall. 604 1008).

(19:

1091
1067

Mercurius, The, 1 C. Rob. So..
Merriam v. Hartford & N. H. R. Co. 20
Conn. 354
.728, 730, 731
v. Smith, 11 Fed. Rep. 588.... 422
Merrill R. & L. Co. v. Merrill, 80 Wis.

358....
Merryweather v. Nixon, 8 T. R. 186 ..
Mersey Docks & Harbor Board Trus-
tees v. Gibbs, L. R. 1 H. L.
93..

Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U. S. 586 (32: 543).

Metropolitan Bd. of Excise v. Barrie,

34 N. Y. 57.

Metropolitan R. Co. v. District of Columbia, 132 U. S. 1 (33: 231)

.521, 913

Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Haber, 169

U. S. 613 (42: 878) 707, 710, 717
v. Roberts, 152 U. S. 144 (38:
377)
Missouri, K. & T. Trust Co. v. McLach-
lan, 59 Minn. 468.

Missouri, Laclede Gaslight Co., v. Mur-
phy, 170 U. S. 78 (42:
955)

349 Missouri P. R. Co. v. Fitzgerald, 160 U.
550
S. 556 (40: 536)..

411

476

348

519, 936, 1179, 1185 v. Henning, 48 Kan. 465........ 911 v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512 (29:

463)

v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205 (32:

758

.910, 914, 918

767

[blocks in formation]

v. Moore [1887] 121 U. S. 558
(30: 1022).

886 Mexican C. R. Co. v. Pinkney, 149 U. S. 194 (37: 699) ..574, 668 Meyer v. Cox, 169 U. S. 735 (42: 1207) .1179, 1180 Michigan Land & L. Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589 (42: 591).... 79, 774 Michoud v. Girod, 4 How. 503 (11: 1076)... 612

Mitchell v. Burlington, 4 Wall. 270

v. United States, 9 Pet. 711 (9:

283) Mitchell County v. City Nat. Bank, 91 Tex. 361. ...1063, 1064, 1065 Mobile & O. R. Co. v. Tennessee, 153 U. S. 486 (38: 793).. 389 Mobile County v. Kimball, 102 U. S. 691 (26: 238) ...447, 454

[blocks in formation]

178

239, 240 Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States, 148 U. S. 312 (37: 463).. ...288, 296, 980 Montana Co. Limited v. Clark, 42 Fed. Rep. 626.. Montello, The, 11 Wall. 411 (20: 191). ...1139, 1140 The, 20 Wall. 430 (22: 391). 369 Montgomery v. United States, 162 Ú. S. 410 (40: 1020) Mooney v. Buford & George Mfg. Co. 34 U. S. App. 581, 72 Fed. Rep. 32.. Moorcock, The, L. R. 13 Prob. Div. 157 Moore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 43 Iowa, 385

707

330

Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Alabama,
128 U. S. 96 (32: 352) 2
Inters. Com. Rep. 238....
Nathan v. Louisiana, S How. 73 (12:
993)
National Bank v. County of Yankton,
101 U. S. 129 (25: 1046). 501
National Fire Ins. Co. v. Chambers, 53
N. J. Eq. 468...
National Steamship Co. v. Tugman, 106
U. S. 118 (27:87).
Neagle, Re [1890] 135 U. S. 1 (34: 55)

1146

439

.701, 886 Needham v. Thayer, 147 Mass. 536... 813 Neilson v. Garza, 2 Woods, 287....193, 195 Neslin v. Wells, 104 U. S. 428 (26:

473

1146 759

1147

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

v. Marsh, 7 Wall. 515 (19:37) Moores v. Wait, 3 Wend. 104.... .423, 429 Moran v. Miami County Comrs. 2 Black, 722 (17: 342). 1091 More v. Steinbach, 127 U. S. 70 (32: 51) 146 Morford v. Barnes [1835] 8 Yerg. 444 .882, 883 Morgan v. Curtenius, 20 How. 1 (15: 823)...

1064

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

New

v. Wilson, 7 Cranch, 164 (3:

303)

v. Yard, 95 U. S. 104 (24: 352)

346

.845, 848, 849 Orleans v. Abbagnato, 23 U. S. App. 533, 26 L. R. A. 329.. v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411 (38: 764)

664, 665, 941 v. Citizens' Bank, 167 U. S. 371

(42: 202) .858, 1036 v. Clark, 95 U. S. 644 (24: 521) .501, 799, 800 v. New Orleans Waterworks Co. 142 U. S. 79 (35: 943).... 683 v. New York Mail Steamship Co. 20 Wall. 387 (22: 354)... v. United States, 10 Pet. 662 (9: 573)

96

964

New Orleans Gaslight Co. v. Louisiana
Light H. P. & Mfg. Co. 115
U. S. 650 (29: 516).....330, 345
v. New Orleans, 42 La. Ann. 188 349

653 New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisi

ana Sugar Ref. Co. 125 U.

S. 18 (31: 607)....387, 391, 525

689

1149

v. New Orleans, 164 U. S. 471

603

[blocks in formation]

627

v. Rivers, 115 U. S. 674 (29:

v. Stalnaker, 104 U. S. 213 (26:

741)

822

Moseley v. Brown, 76 Va. 419...
Moses v. Ranlet [1822] 2 N. H. 488...
Moses Bros. v. Johnson, 88 Ala. 517..
Moulton v. Reid, 54 Ala. 320.

390

[blocks in formation]

644

423

Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548 (25: 710)

576

203,

595

Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623 (31:

[blocks in formation]

New York v. Eno, 155 U. S. 89 (39:80) ..542, 543 New York C. & H. R. R. Co. v. Fraloff [1879] 100 U. S. 24 (25: 531) New York Iron Mine v. First Nat. Bank, 39 Mich. 644.. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 158 U. S. 431 (39: 1043) New York Life Ins. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S. W. 680.. 918 New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. New York, 165 U. S. 628 (41: 853)

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

O'Connor v. Walter, 37 Neb. 267, 23 L.
R. A. 650..
348 Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. 213 (6:
606)..

782

...

1147

837

392

412 Ohio & M. R. Co. v. McClure, 10 Wall.
511 (19: 997).
v. Wheeler, 1 Black, 286 (17:
758
130)
.439, 1087, 1092
605 Ohio & P. Coal Co. v. Smith, 53 Ohio
St. 313..
349 Ohlquest v. Farwell, 71 Iowa, 231.
Olcott v. Fond du Lac County Supers.
16 Wall. 678 (21: 382)... 1064
Omaha & N. W. R. Co. v. Redick, 16
Neb. 313.

774

678 1032

631

162

[blocks in formation]

Opinion of the Justices [1860] 41 N.
H. 550..
Orchard v. Alexander, 157 U. S. 372
(39:737).

878

774

[blocks in formation]

North Carolina, The, 15 Pet. 40 (10: 653)

415

[blocks in formation]

North Carolina R. Co. v. Swasey, 23
Wall. 405 (23: 136)..
Northern Bank v. Porter Township, 110
U. S. 608 (28: 258)....694, 697
Northern P. R. Co. v. Clark, 153 U. S.
252 (38: 706) 4 Inters.
Com. Rep. 641.

v. Colburn, 164 U. S. 383 (41:
479)

v. Patterson, 154 U. S. 130 (38:
934)

v. Sanders, 166 U. S. 620 (41:
1139)

v. Stovenour, 10 Land Dec. 645 1116
v. Traill County, 115 U. S. 600
(29: 477)

v. Wright, 7 U. S. App. 502...
Northern Transp. Co. v. Chicago, 99 U.
S. 635 (25: 336).
North Missouri R. Co. v. Stephens, 36
Mo. 150, 88 Am. Dec. 138 1032
North Star, The, 106 U. S. 17 (27:

Northwestern Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde Park, 97 U. S. 659 (24: 1036).

v. Humphrey, 7 Conn. 335. Otoe County v. Baldwin, 111 U. S. 1 (28: 331)..

820

Oregon v. Jennings, 119 U. S. 74 (30:
323).
Oregon R. & Nav. Co. v. Oregonian R.
Co. 130 U. S. 1 (32: 837).
Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S.
557 (43: 552).
Origet v. Hedden, 155 U. S. 228
130)..
Orleans v. Platt, 99 U. S. 676
404)..
Osborn v. Adams, 18 Pick. 245.
v. Bank of United States, 9
Wheat. 738 (6:204).

696

71

749

(39:

396

(25:

694

837

.494, 540, 852 v. New York & N. H. R. Co. 40 Conn. 491. 568 Osborne v. Florida, 164 U. S. 650 (41: 586).. 1115

412

[ocr errors]

721

412

501

567

Ouachita & M. R. Packet Co. v. Aiken

567

379

Oxley

121 U. S. 444 (30: 976) 1
Inters. Com. Rep. 379..
Ould v. Washington Hospital, 95 U. S.
303 (24: 450).
Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166
U. S. 648 (41: 1149)

297

962

..368, 526, 666, 843, 1180, 1185

[blocks in formation]

Parkersburg & O. R. Transp. Co. v.
Parkersburg, 107 U. S. 691

(27: 584).

Park Hotel Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 58 U. S. App. 674, 86 Fed. Rep. 742.

Parkhurst v. Salem [Parkhurst v. Capital City R. Co.] 23 Or. 471, 32 Pac. 304....

(7:732).

297

Parr, Ex parte, 1 Rose, Bankr. Rep. 76 657
Parsons v. Bedford [1830] 3 Pet. 433
..876, 877, 887
v. District of Columbia, 170 U.
S. 45 (42: 943)... ..453, 874
Patch v. White, 117 U. S. 221 (29:
864.
Patrie v. Murray [1864] 43 Barb. 323
Patterson v. Kentucky, 97 U. S. 501
(24: 1115)
Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 (19:
357).

972

877

348

325, 326, 436, 437, 440, 441, Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30 (37: 637).. Pauly v. State Loan & T. Co. 165 U. S. 606 (41: 844)

461

1182

Payne v. Robertson, 169 U. S. 323 (42:
764)..
Peacock, Ex parte, [1825] 2 Glyn & J.
27..

614

657

Pearce v. Madison & I. R. Co. 21 How. 441 (16:184).

Pearson v. Portland, 69 Me. 278.
Pedrick v. Bailey, 12 Gray, 161.
Peirce v. New Hampshire, 46 U. S. 5
How. 504 (12: 256).
Peirsoll v. Elliott, 6 Pet. 95 (8:332)
....963, 1088
Pelham v. Rose, 9 Wall. 103 (19:
602).
Pembina Consol. Silver Min. & M. Co.
v. Pennsylvania, 125 U. S.
181 (31: 650) 2 Inters. Com.
Rep. 24.

1090
918
605

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Pepke v. Cronan, 155 U. S. 100 (39: 84).. Pepperell, The, Swabey, Adm. 12 Peralta Case, 19 How. 343 (15: 678).. Perrin v. United States, 171 U. S. 292 (43: 169). 554 Peterhoff, The, 5 Wall. 28 Pettibone v. La Crosse & M. 14 Wis. 443. Peyroux v. Howard, 7 Pet. 324 (8: 700). Phantom, The, L. R. 1 Adm. & Eccl. 58. .417, 418 Philadelphia Fire Asso. v. New York,

119 U. S. 110 (30: 342).. 441 Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. v. Philadelphia & H. de G. Steam Towboat Co. 23 How. 209 (16: 433).

96

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

1128

913

Planters' Bank v. Union Bank (1872) 16 Wall. 483 (21:473)... ...211, 1124, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 (41: 256).. Plumley v. Massachusetts, 155 U. S. 462 (39: 223)....55, 59, 60, 196 Plummer, Re [1841] 1 Phill. Ch. 56 Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U. S. 270 (29: 185) ...383, 541 Polk's Lessee v. Wendal, 9 Cranch, 87 (3: 665)

657

Quincy v. Kennard, 151 Mass. 563.... 605

R.

Pollard v. Holeman [1816] 4 Bibb, 416..

1064

Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 157

[blocks in formation]

883

[blocks in formation]

412

R. D. Bibber, The, 33 Fed. Rep. 55. Rea v. Missouri, 17 Wall. 532 (21: 707)

416

1150

.501, 800

Pool v. Boston, 5 Cush. 219.
Porter v. Pittsburg Steel Bessemer Co.
122 U. S. 267 (30: 1210)..
Portsmouth, The, 9 Wail. 682 (19:

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Read v. Plattsmouth, 107 U. S. 568 (27: 414) Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 154 U. S. 362 (38: 1014) 4 Inters. Com. Rep. 560.... ..541, 860, 1160 Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 U. S. 347

(23: 719)

43 (24: 336)

...907, 1060 Reckner v. Warner [1872] 22 Ohio St. 275... Redlands, L. & C. Domestic Water Co. v. Redlands [1898] 121 Cal. 365, 53 Pac. 843... Red Rock v. Henry, 106 U. S. 596 (27: 251) Reed v. McIntyre, 98 U. S. 513 (25: 173)

834

1161

741

1100

[blocks in formation]

v. Reed, 19 S. C. 548. Remelee v. Hall, 31 Vt. 582, 76 Am. Dec. 140.. Remington Paper Co. v. Watson, 173 U. S. 443 (43: 762). Republican Min. Co. v. Tyler Min. Co. 48 U. S. App. 213. Reusens v. Lawson, 91 Va. 226. Revett v. Brown, 5 Bing. 7.... Rex v. Baldwin, 3 Campb. 265.. v. Jervis, 6 Car. & P. 156. v. Ratcliffe, 1 Lewin, C. C. 121 v. Turner, 1 Moody, C. C. 347.

1031

816

596

612

909

87

227

422

895

896

894

1121

326

[blocks in formation]

817

[blocks in formation]

162

Rep. 691..

833

Pryor v. Hays [1836] 9 Yerg. 416..

882

..633, 1103

Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transp. Co. 171 U. S. 138 (43: 108)

v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S. 18 (35: 613) 3 Inters. Com.

Rep. 595.326, 902, 903, 904, 1145 Richards v. Chase Elevator Co. 158 U.

Pumpelly v. Green Bay & M. Canal Co.

13 Wall. 166 (20: 557).379, 1013

.423, 429 S. 299 (39: 991)......907, 1060 Richardson v. Crandall, 48 N. Y. 348 1121

Rhode Island, The, 17 Fed. Rep. 554.. Rialto, The [1891] P. 175..

805

418

Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197 (36: 403) Richard Liford's Case, 11 Coke, 46.

469

« ForrigeFortsett »