972 877 348 ..453, 874 Patch v. White, 117 U. S. 221 (29: 864. Patrie v. Murray [1864] 43 Barb. 323 Patterson v. Kentucky, 97 U. S. 501 (24: 1115) Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 (19: 357). 518. 934 71 657 325, 326, 436, 437, 440, 441, Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30 (37: 637). Pauly v. State Loan & T. Co. 165 U. S. 606 (41: 844) Payne v. Robertson, 169 U. S. 323 (42: 764).. Peacock, Ex parte, [1825] 2 Glyn & J. 1182 614 27. 657 Pearce v. Madison & I. R. Co. 21 How. 441 (16: 184). Pearson v. Portland, 69 Me. 278. 1090 605 758 Peirce v. New Hampshire, 46 U. S. 5 53 Peirsoll v. Elliott, 6 Pet. 95 (8:332) Penfield v. Chesapeake, O. & S. W. R. 326 1173 Pepke v. Cronan, 155 U. S. 100 (39: 84). Pepperell, The, Swabey, Adm. 12 Peralta Case, 19 How. 343 (15: 678).. Perrin v. United States, 171 U. S. 292 (43: 169). 554 Peterhoff, The, 5 Wall. 28 (18: 564) Pettibone v. La Crosse & M. R. R. Co. 461 14 Wis. 443. Peyroux v. Howard, 7 Pet. 324 (8: 700). Phantom, The, L. R. 1 Adm. & Eccl. 58. .417, 418 Philadelphia Fire Asso. v. New York, 119 U. S. 110 (30: 342).. 441 Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. v. Philadelphia & H. de G. Steam Towboat Co. 23 How. 209 (16: 433). 70 346 1147 Pennoyer v. McConnaughy, 140 U. S. 1 (35: 363). Pickering v. McCullough, 104 U. S. 907 541 v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714 (24: 565) .574, 638, 668, 677, 812, Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Jones, 155 U. S. 333 (39: 176).. v. St. Louis, A. & T. H. R. Co. People v. Bawden, 90 Cal. 195.. People, 1087 v. Kamaunu, 110 Cal. 609.. 460 v. Marx, 99 N. Y. 377, 52 Am. 53 V. Maynard, 15 Mich. 463. 938 v. O'Brien, 11 N. Y. 1, 2 L. R. A. v. Remington, 121 N. Y. 328, 8 766 Pizarro, The, 2 Wheat. 227 (4:226).. 1071 16 Wall. 483 (21: 473)... Purdy v. Doyle, 1 Paige, 558 653 1128 913 657 462 (39: 223)....55, 59, 60, 196 .383, 541 1064 Pollard v. Holeman [1816] 4 Bibb, 883 Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 157 Pool v. Boston, 5 Cush. 219. . Posthoff v. Schreiber, 47 Hun, 593.. 793 Rahrer, Re [Wilkerson v. Rahrer] 140' 423 919 416 1146 739 412 R. D. Bibber, The, 33 Fed. Rep. 55. 106 Ala. 501... Rea v. Missouri, 17 Wall. 532 (21: Read v. Plattsmouth, 107 U. S. 568 707) ... 1150 (27: 414) .501, 800 239 416 1064 496 Potter v. United States, 155 U. S. 438 Pound v. Turck, 95 U. S. 459 (24: 525) 705 Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & T. Co. 154 Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 U. S. 347 (23: 719) .907, 1060 440 (37: 1137) (32: 253) 43 (24: 336) Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105 Redlands, L. & C. Domestic Water Co. 834 1161 741 1100 816 612 Price v. Forrest, 54 N. J. Eq. 669. 752 Prinz Heinrich, The, L. R. 13 Prob. v. Reed, 19 S. C. 548. 1031 596 909 87 227 422 895 v. Jervis, 6 Car. & P. 156. Reyburn v. Brackett, 2 Kan. 227, 83 896 894 186 Providence Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45 (17: 868) 1121 627 Provident Inst. for Sav. v. Massachu- 326 Reynolds v. State Mutual Ins. Co. 2 527 v. Witte, 13 S. C. 5, 36 Am. Rep. 817 678. 611 Provolt v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 57 Rhawn v. Pearce, 110 Ill. 350, 51 Am. Mo. 256.. 162 Rep. 691. 833 Pryor v. Hays [1836] 9 Yerg. 416.. 882 Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transp. Co. 171 U. S. 138 (43: 108) v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S. 18 ...633, 1103 (35: 613) 3 Inters. Com. Rep. 595.326, 902, 903, 904, 1145 Pumpelly v. Green Bay & M. Canal Co. 13 Wall. 166 (20: 557).379, 1013' 30 Richard Liford's Case, 11 Coke, 46. .423, 429 Richards v. Chase Elevator Co. 158 U. Richardson v. Crandall, 48 N. Y. 348 1121 Rhode Island, The, 17 Fed. Rep. 554.. 805 418 Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197 (36: 469 Richelieu & O. Nav. Co. v. Boston Ma- Richmond, The, 103 U. S. 540 (26: v. Vos, 155 U. S. 13 (39:52) Robbins v. Shelby County Tax. Dist. 120 U. S. 489 (30: 694) 1 Inters. Com. Rep. 45..... Sabariego v. Maverick, 124 U. S. 261 Saco v. Wentworth [1853] 37 Me. 165, ..71, 349 1087 Roberts v. Cooper, 20 How. 467 (15: 969) 772 St. Clair v. Cox, 106 U. S. 350 (27: 103) .573, 574 St. Joseph & G. I. R. Co. v. Steele, 167 U. S. 659 (42: 315). St. Joseph Twp. v. Rogers, 16 Wall. 644 (21: 328). St. Louis v. Western U. Teleg. Co. 148 U. S. 92 (37: 380) 297, 348, 1166 ..299, 325, 331 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Curtis, 48 Kan. 179. v. Gill, 156 U. S. 649 (39: 567) v. James, 161 U. S. 545 (40: 802). .1087, 1092 v. McMullen, 48 Kan. 281.... 911 v. Mathews, 165 U. S. 1 (41: 611). .749, 912, 919 v. Snavely, 47 Kan. 637... St. Louis, C. G. & Ft. Smith R. Co. v. Missouri (Merriam) 156 U. S. 478 (39: 502).. 428 St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Grafton, 51 Ark. 504. 911 1007 v. Northern P. R. Co. 158 U. S. 1 (39: 873) 163 Robertson v. Anderson, 57 Iowa, 165.. 358 v. Cease, 97 U. S. 646 (24: 1057) 435 Roby v. Colehour, 146 U. S. 153 (36: 922) ...369, 667 Rogers v. Durant, 106 U. S. 644 (27: 303) v. Heads Iron Foundry Co. 51 Neb. 39, 37 L. R. A. 429... Rogers Locomotive Mach. Works v. American Emigrant Co. 164 U. S. 559 (41: 552) Rolfe v. Flower [1866] L. R. 1 P. C. 27 Roosevelt v. Mark, 6 Johns. Ch. 285.. Root v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. 105 U. S. 189 (26: 975) Roseberry v. Nixon, 58 Hun, 121. Rosen v. United States, 161 U. S. 29 (40: 606) Ross v. Barland, 1 Pet. 665 (7: 302).. v. King (mem.) 172 U. S. 641 (43: 1180). Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47 (39: 341) .816, 817, 1183 Rowan's Executors v. Portland, 8 B. Mon. 232 .964, 971 Rowe v. Granite Bridge Corp. 21 Pick. 344. v. Paul, 173 U. S. 404 (43: 746) v. Williams, 49 Ark. 492...... St. Louis Smelting & Ref. Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636 (26: 875) 91, 963 V. & T. H. R. Co. v. Terre Haute & I. R. Co. 145 U. S. 117 393 (36:738). 496 St. Paul & D. R. Co. v. United States, 112 U. S. 733 (28: 861).. 753 897 St. Paul, M. & M. R. Co. v. Todd 428 County, 142 U. S. 282 (35: 1014) 1185 1140 1091 412 .706, 716, 1097, 1098 Richmond & D. R. Co. v. Alamance Comrs. 84 N. C. 504... Richmond Min. Co. v. Eureka Min. Co. 103 U. S. 839 (26: 557)... Riggs v. Johnson County, 6 Wall. 166 (18:768). Ring v. Devlin, 68 Wis. 384. Ritchie v. Sample, cited in Note to Bland, Ch. 468.. Robb v. Connolly, 111 U. S. 624 (28: 542) Russell's Application, Matter of, 51 Conn. 577 (50 Am. Rep. 55) 131 Rutland R. Co. v. Central Vt. R. Co. 159 U. S. 630 (40: 284).... 319 759 412 Rumsey v. Boutwell, 61 Hun, 165.... 397). 177 1064 961 542 1088 S. 774 657 739 145 879 346 424 1091 911 860 765 739 912 918 • St. Tammany Waterworks v. New Or- 548 Royal British Bank v. Turquand [1856] 800 383 v. Tucker, 166 U. S. 707 (41: 1172). Saltonstall v. Wiebusch, 156 U. S. 601 (39: 549).. 735 Sampeyreac v. United States, 7 Pet. 496 222 (8: 665). 938 Samuel H. Stone, v. Bank of Commerce, No. 362, 174 U. S. 412 (43: 1028)... 1035, 1040 962 1090 391 345 349 349 142 1053 San Diego Water Co. v. San Diego, 118 v. Wharton, 2 Hen. & M. 25. Scudder v. Union Nat. Bank, 91 U. S. 406 (23: 245). 423 475 447 627 .1159, 1161 Sands v. Edmunds, 116 U. S. 585 (29: 739) v. Manistee River Improv. Co. 123 U. S. 288 (31: 149) 296, 297 Sanford v. Sanford, 139 U. S. 647 (35: 292) San Mateo County v. Southern P. R. Co. 116 U. S. 138 (29: 589) San Pedro & C. D. A. Co. v. United States, 146 U. S. 120 (36: 912) 615 934 581 Santa Clara County v. Southern P. R. 440 772 878 Satterlee v. Matthewson, 2 Pet. 380 (7:458) .388, 526 Savings & L. Soc. v. Multnomah County, 169 U. S. 421 v. Kochersperger, 170 U. S. 303 v. Oakman, 7 Blatchf. 290. 766 357 (23: 428 653 203 Searle v. Lake County School Dist. No. 331). v. Stetter, 25 Kan. 155. 682, 748, 844 Sinnot v. Davenport, 22 How. 227 (16: 242). Sioux City & I. F. Town Lot & L. Co. v. Griffey, 143 U. S. 32 (36: 64). Sioux City Street R. Co. v. Sioux City, 138 U. S. 98 (34: 898)..682, 844 Sioux City T. & W. Co. v. Trust Co. of N. A. 173 U. S. 99 (43: 628) 1097 Sioux City Trust Co. v. Trust Co..... 1097 Sir Wm. Armstrong, The, 53 Fed. Rep. S. B. Wheeler, The, 20 Wall. 386 (22: 385) 759 Scarritt Furniture Co. v. Moser, 48 Schaller v. Wright, 70 Iowa, 667...... 596 1116 Scott, Ex parte, 66 Fed. Rep. 45. 53 Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36 .645, 656, 658, 929, 1110 Sloan v. Wittbank, 12 Ind. 444. 437 1105 877 648 Sohier v. Trinity Church, 109 Mass. 1 Sonnentheil v. Tharp, 17 W. Va. 221....218, 220 Smith's Lessee v. Chapman, 10 Gratt. Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466 (42: 438, 440, 541, 708, 860, 861, 1160 Society for Savings v. Coite, 6 Wall. V. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co. 172 U. S. 401 (43: 492) v. Texas Guaranty & T. Co. (10 Tex. Civ. App. 274) 30 S. 614 218 648 326 426 926 ... .71, 345, 349 Duke, v. Central New Jersey Teleph. 497 South & N. Ala. R. Co., Ex parte, 95 U. S. 221 (24: 355). 1183 Southern Bldg. & L. Asso. v. Hallum Humphreys, v. Bayonne, 55 N. J. L. 412 465 135 Spain v. State, 59 Miss. 19. 460 Sparks v. Pierce, 115 U. S. 408 (29: 428) 822 Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall. 97 (18: 49) Spilman v. Parkersburg, 35 W. Va. 605 Spring Valley Waterworks v. Bartlett, v. Bryant, 52 Cal. 132. v. San Francisco, 52 Cal. 111 1159 L. R. A. 756...... ..1158, 1159 Steuart v. Baltimore [1855] 7 Md. 500 76 (23: 669) .356, 452, 455 State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds, 15 Wall. 300 (21: 179).. Steel v. St. Louis Smelting & Ref. Co. 106 U. S. 447 (27: 226).... 668 91 Steiner v. Ray, 84 Ala. 92. 197 883 245 425 603 112 86 1147 |