to the charge relating to non-com- pliance with law; and if as a result of the contest it be determined that the land is of a character subject to entry under the desert-land law, the suspension should be removed.
In case of an application by a cor- poration to make desert-land entry, it is within the power and it is the duty of the land department to in- quire into the qualifications of the individuals composing the corpora- tion to make entry in their own right under the provisions of the desert- land law
It is within the power and is the duty of the land department to re- quire a corporation, seeking to ac- quire title to a desert land entry as assignee of the original entryman, to show that the individual members composing the corporation are not disqualified under the desert land law to hold and acquire title to such entry
Recognition in the act of March 3, 1891, of the right of assignment of desert-land entries furnishes no authority for recognizing a right on the part of a desert-land entryman to enter into an executory contract to convey the land after the issuance of patent and to thereafter proceed with the submission of final proof in furtherance of such contract_____ 383 A citizen of one State or Territory who goes to another State or Terri- tory with the avowed intention to make his permanent home therein, and in his sworn application to make desert land entry declares himself to be a resident of such State or Terri- tory, is held to be a "resident citi-
thereof within the meaning of the desert land law and in that re- spect qualified to make such entry therein, where in pursuance of his he expressed intention makes his home in such State or Territory, even though he may not, at the date of making the entry, have acquired a political residence in the State or Territory such as would entitle him to the voting privilege HOMESTEAD.
The fact that land is more valu- able for the timber and stone thereon than for agricultural purposes does not exclude it from appropriation under the homestead laws, if not mineral in character
Equitable Adjudication.
Where the only objection to con- firmation of a military bounty land
to a copy of the final proof sub- mitted on his application__-
Where in final proof proceedings a witness is asked to give a categor- ical answer to an interrogatory, he should be permitted, in connection therewith, to state such facts and circumstances in explanation thereof as in his opinion make the categor- ical answer the correct one to the question he is required to answer in such form__.
Where the final proof submitted on an entry made under section 2307 of the Revised Statutes shows that the entrywoman never established actual residence upon the land, al- though notified in accordance with the directions contained in depart- mental decision in the Anna Bowes case that if she desired to retain her entry she would be required to begin actual residence upon the land with- in six months from notice, such proof is insufficient and will be rejected; but where it appears that the proof was offered prior to the expiration of six months from the date of such notice, the entry should not be can- celed unless it be first ascertained that she did not begin actual resi- dence upon the land within the pre- scribed period
Homestead.
See Entry. GENERALLY.
Where a homestead claimant, by contract to convey the land em- braced in his entry after the submis- sion of final proof, puts it beyond his power to acquire title under the en- try except by perjury, he thereby for- feits his rights, and upon proof of such fact the entry will be canceled __ 46
WIDOW; HEIRS; DEVISEE.
There is no provision of the home- stead law by which any rights or claims to public lands, prior to the issuance of patent, can be devised or succeeded to and perfected by, or on behalf of, other than citizens of the United States
A homestead entryman who at the time of his death had not acquired the legal title to the land embraced in his entry, was not at such time, by reason of his claim under the en- try, a person holding real prop- erty," within the meaning of article
1 of the treaty of March 2, 1899, be- tween the United States and Great Britain, and his alien heirs, subjects of the latter country, have therefore no such claim or right to the lands embraced in the entry as is entitled to protection under the provisions of said treaty
The heirs of a deceased homestead entryman may delegate to another the power to perform for their bene- fit the cultivation on the entry re- quired by law, and such cultivation, if actually carried on in good faith for the required period, constitutes compliance with the homestead law the same as though performed by the heirs themselves
By virtue of the provisions of sec- tion 2305 of the Revised Statutes as amended by the act of March 1, 1901, proof of the death of a homestead entryman while actually engaged in the military service of the United States renders unnecessary any showing that would have been other- wise required touching his compli- ance with law in the matters of resi- dence, cultivation and improvement 392 The properly-constituted adminis- trator of the estate of a deceased homestead entryman is authorized to submit final proof under the provi- sions of section 2305 of the Revised Statutes as amended by the act of March 1, 1901, as his " legal repre- sentative"
Upon satisfactory proof of the death of a homestead entryman while actually engaged in the mili- tary service of the United States, leaving no widow or minor orphan children surviving him, it is the duty of the land department, under the provisions of section 2305 of the Re- vised Statutes as amended by the act of March 1, 1901, to issue patent to his legal representatives," leaving it to the courts to determine in whom the title shall vest.
An Indian to whom land in a res- ervation has been allotted as a mem- ber of a tribe, but which land has never become a part of the public domain subject to the general provi- sions of the homestead law, can not, as a citizen of the United States, make homestead entry, under section 2289 of the Revised Statutes, of the land so allotted to him. ADDITIONAL.
A homestead entryman is not en- titled to make a second entry under
the provisions of the act of April 28, 1904, 33 Stat., 527, upon a showing that he relinquished his original entry for the reason that the land embraced therein was unsuitable for farming purposes and was not of sufficient acreage to enable him to support himself and family by using the land for grazing purposes.
Circular of April 10, 1906, under act of April 28, 1904 (33 Stat., 547), commonly known as the "Kinkaid Act"
Circular of May 31, 1904, under act of April 28, 1904, amended__
Circular of September 1, 1905, relative to second entries under sec- tion 3, act of June 5, 1900, and sec- tion 1, act of April 28, 1904. ---- 114 The act of April 28, 1904, known as the "Kinkaid Act," does not re- peal any of the provisions of the homestead laws, but merely amends said laws by allowing entry of a greater number of acres, within the limits designated, than is permitted thereunder, and one disqualified to make entry under the general home- stead laws, by reason of being the owner of more than one hundred and sixty acres of land, is therefore likewise disqualified to make entry under said act--
The qualifications of an applicant to make additional entry under the act of April 28, 1904, must be de- termined as of the date of the pre- sentation of the application and not as of the date when his original en- try was made__.
Residence upon the land embraced in the original homestead entry is an indispensable prerequisite to the preference right to enter additional contiguous land accorded by the act of April 28, 1904-
The act of April 28, 1904, known as the "Kinkaid Act," authorizes a second or additional homestead en- try of so much land, within the lim- its defined in the act, as added to that embraced in the first entry shall not exceed six hundred and forty acres, regardless of the fact that the entryman may have relinquished his first entry for a valuable considera- tion
The act of April 28, 1904, com- monly known as the "Kinkaid Act," contemplates only one additional en- try under its provisions; and where such entry is made, even though for an amount of land less than author- ized by the act, the right is thereby exhausted
homestead entry accorded by section 2 of the act of April 28, 1904, gen- erally known as the "Kinkaid Act," is limited to persons who made their original entries prior to the date of said act__.
The right of additional entry pro- vided for by section 2 of the act of April 28, 1904, is limited to persons who theretofore had entered under the homestead laws lands within the territory described in the act, and who Own and occupy such lands, and can only be exercised upon lands contiguous to the original entry
The right of additional entry ac- corded by the proviso to section 3 of the act of April 28, 1904, extends to all persons who prior to application to exercise said privilege had made homestead entry, and there is no warrant in the act for further limit- ing the right, as is done in the in- structions of May 31, 1904, issued under said act, to a homesteader who had resided upon and culti- vated the land embraced in his orig- inal entry for the period required by law
Where an application to make homestead entry was pending at the date of the act of April 28, 1904, and prior to allowance of entry thereon the applicant presented a supple- mental application to enter addi- tional lands under the provisions of said act, requesting that the two ap- plications be considered together, the fact that entry on the original application was inadvertently al- lowed without considering the sup- plemental application, does not war- rant rejection of the application for additional entry on the ground that the original entry was allowed sub- sequently to the passage of the act__ 274 An additional entry under the act of April 28, 1904, even though for a less amount of land than authorized by the act, exhausts the right; but where at the time the entryman sought to exercise his additional right, part of the lands contiguous to his original entry and subject to his preference right and desired to be en- tered by him, were found to be em- braced within an existing though in- valid additional entry made by an- other under said act, and he there- upon made entry for a less amount of land than he was entitled to en- ter, and thereafter by means of a contest procured the cancellation of the invalid entry covering the re- mainder of the lands desired by him,
Where one entitled to make addi- tional entry under the act of April 28, 1904, exercises his right for a less amount of land than he is en- titled to enter, and at the time of making such entry announces his in- tention to amend his additional en- try to include other lands desired by him, sufficient to aggregate the quan- tity to which he is entitled under the act, as soon as he succeeds in clear- ing the records of other claims to such adidtional lands, and takes prompt action to that end, he may be permitted to amend his entry in accordance with such purpose when the additional lands desired by him become subject to entry, provided the rule as to compactness be observed__ 573 In determining the "extreme length" of a homestead entry under the "Kinkaid Act," the measure- ment should follow the lines of the public survey, and no entry should be allowed for any tract exceeding two miles either in length or breadth, and no application for an entry in as nearly compact form as possible should be rejected solely because its combined length and breadth or diagonal measurement exceeds two miles
ing from his muster into the service, and not from his enrollment------- 291 SOLDIERS' ADDITIONAL.
In every case where the soldier rendered the requisite military serv ice and made homestead entry for less than one hundred and sixty acres prior to the adoption of the Revised Statutes, the proper founda- tion exists for an additional entry under the provisions of sections 2306 and 2307 of the Revised Statutes, notwithstanding the soldier may have died prior to the enactment of said legislation
Sections 2306 and 2307 of the Revised Statutes do not contemplate more than one additional right of entry, founded upon one and the same military service.
Sections 2306 and 2307 of the Re- vised Statutes do not contemplate more than one additional right of entry, founded upon one and the same military service; and the ex- istence of a valid additional right based upon a homestead entry made by the soldier, precludes an inde- pendent additional right to his widow, or after her death to the heirs of her estate, based upon a homestead entry made by her..
Location having been allowed of a portion of an additional right based upon a homestead entry made by the widow of a soldier, and recertifica- tion made for the remainder of the right, it is held, upon application being made for the allowance of a further additional right based upon an entry made by the soldier him- self, that no foundation therefor ex- ists, the additional right allowed on the homestead entry of the widow being considered as having been based upon the homestead entry of the soldier
The additional right accruing to the widow of a soldier, under sec- tions 2306 and 2307 of the Revised Statutes, by reason of an entry for less than one hundred and sixty acres made by herself, is a property right vested in her, and is not for- feited by her remarriage or death; but in case of her remarriage is held in abeyance during coverture, and in event of her death remains an asset of her estate
The additional right of entry ac- cruing to the widow of a soldier un- der the provisions of sections 2306 and 2307 of the Revised Statutes,
based upon an entry made by her- self, is not lost, forfeited or extin- guished by her remarriage, but is merely held in abeyance during cov- erture, and upon removal of such disability may be exercised or dis- posed of by her as though she had remained the soldier's widow.
Where a soldier qualified to make additional entry under the provi- sions of section 2306 of the Revised Statutes dies without having exer- cised or disposed of such right, his widow is, in the first instance, en- titled thereto, by virtue of the pro- visions of section 2307, but if she remarry or die without having exer- cised or disposed of the right, his minor orphan children become en- titled thereto, and if not exercised or disposed of by them, through a guardian, during their minority, the right remains an asset of the sol- dier's estate
In case a soldier's widow entitled to make additional entry under sec- tions 2306 and 2307 of the Revised Statutes, by virtue of an entry for less than one hundred and sixty acres made by herself, remarries, without having exercised or disposed of such right, it can not be asserted during coverture; nor can the fact that the only child of the soldier joined the widow in an assignment of such right in any wise affect the situ- ation, in view of the fact that the right is based upon an entry made by the widow and not by the soldier 345 The mere fact that a certificate of additional right has issued in the name of the soldier under section 2306 of the Revised Statutes will not prevent him from selling and divesting himself of the right it- self, of which the certificate is merely the evidence; and upon satis- factory showing of the loss or de- struction of the certificate, it may be reissued and recertified in the name of the assignee entitled to the right 685 Only one application of the rule of approximation is allowed to each original right of soldiers' additional entry, and where the right is divided, the rule may be applied only in the location of one portion thereof; but where a portion of a right is located for a tract of land embracing merely a fraction of an acre excess, such small excess will not, under the rule de minimis non curat lex, be re- garded as preventing the holder of the remainder of the right, in mak- ing location thereof, from applying the rule of approximation
The right to make an additional entry accorded by section 5 of the act of March 2, 1889, arises only where the original entry was made prior to the passage of said act, and can be exercised only upon land con- tiguous to that embraced in the orig- inal entry; but the additional entry provided for by section 6 of said act may be allowed whether the original entry was made prior or subsequent to the passage of said act and for land contiguous or noncontiguous to the original entry-
By the exercise of the right to make additional homestead entry conferred by section 6 of the act of March 2, 1889, even though for a less amount of land than might have been taken thereunder, the entryman thereby exhausts the privilege granted by said section
See Railroad Grant; School Land.
Indian Lands.
See Reservation.
Proclamation of July 14, 1905, opening Uintah lands
« ForrigeFortsett » |