 A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the...  The American Law Register - Side 5481888Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1892 - 554 sider
...anthorities; but nevertheless we cannot forbear qnoting from the opinion in Mugler v. Kantns, supra: "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community cannot in any just sense be deemed a taking or appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the... | |
 | 1888 - 1462 sider
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to Ьеда injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any justg sense, be... | |
 | 1912 - 1170 sider
...court held that a prohibition elmply upon the use of property for purposes declared by the Legislature to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of...appropriation of property for the public benefit" (123 US 668, 669, 8 Sup. Ct. 301, 31 L. Ed. 205), for the reason that the owner is not disturbed In... | |
 | 1888 - 494 sider
...compensating them for the diminution in its value resulting from such prohibitory enactments. A prohibition upon the use of property for purposes that are declared...to the health, morals, or safety of the community, is not an appropriation of property for the public benefit, in the sense in which a taking of property... | |
 | 1888 - 572 sider
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are deelared by valid legislation to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community cannot... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1891 - 684 sider
...authorities, but, nevertheless, we can not forbear quoting from the opinion inMugler \. Kansas, xupra; "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...to the health, morals, or safety of the community, can not, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the public benefit.... | |
 | Albany Institute - 1893 - 344 sider
...law-making power, upon reasonable grounds, declares to be prejudicial to the general welfare." And again: " A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or aii appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in... | |
 | William Packer Prentice - 1894 - 578 sider
...the land, that a State has power, by valid legislation, to prohibit the use of property it declares to be injurious to the health, morals or safety of the community ; or that in the Ficklen case, relative to the State power, to tax all property having a situs within... | |
| |
