 | James Bradley Thayer - 1894 - 470 sider
...take jurisdiction. See Wisconsin v. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 US 265, 288, 289, and cases there cited. The suability of a State without its consent was a thing unknown to the law. This has been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary... | |
 | Emlin McClain - 1900 - 1134 sider
...take jurisdiction. See Wisconsin o. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 US 265, 288, 289, and cases there cited. K K K K}G This has been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1906 - 1144 sider
...has a legal interest." See, also, Fitts v. McGhee, 172 US 516, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 269, 43 L. ed. 535. "The suability of a state, without its consent, was a thing unknown to the law. This has so often been laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it ia hardly necessary... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1910 - 804 sider
...attempt to strain the Constitution and the law to a construction never imagined or dreamed of. ... The truth is, that the cognizance of suits and actions...without its consent was a thing unknown to the law. ... It was fully shown in an exhaustive examination of the old law by Mr. Justice Iredell in his [dissenting]... | |
 | James Parker Hall - 1914 - 528 sider
...Wisconsin v. Insurance Co., 127 US 265, 288, 289, 8 Sup. Ct. 1370, 32 L. Ed. 239, and cases there cited. The suability of a state, without its consent, was a thing unknown to the law. This has been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary... | |
 | Harold Edgar Barnes - 1915 - 376 sider
...Constitution should not be construed to impart any power to authorize the bringing of such suits. * * * * The suability of a State without its consent was a thing unknown to the law. This has been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary... | |
 | 1918 - 508 sider
...is an attempt to strain the Constitution and the law to a construction never imagined or dreamed of The suability of a state without its consent was a thing unknown to the law It was fully shown in an exhaustive examination of the old law by Mr. Justice Iredell in his [dissenting]... | |
 | James Brown Scott - 1919 - 572 sider
...of the state, in order through them to reach and to control the State itself. Thus he says : Prece- The suability of a State without its consent was a thing unknown to the law. dents This nas been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary... | |
| |
The suability of a State without its consent was a thing unknown to the law. This has been so often laid down and acknowledged by courts and jurists that it is hardly necessary to be formally asserted. 
