Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

29 = 225 = = (15)3, which is a square number, as was required. 4. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 7x2-5x+1 a square.

Here the last term 1 being a square, let there be taken, according to Case 4,

[blocks in formation]

Then, by rejecting the 1 on each side of the equation,

m

m

2m

1)2=

x + 1.

n

m2 2m

and dividing by x, we shall have 7x-5

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

ing n = 3, and m = 8, we shall have x=

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

, or by tak

[blocks in formation]

72, as required.

5. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 8x2+14x+6 a square.

Here, by comparing this expression with the general formula, ax2 + bx + c, we shall have a = 8, b 14, and c = 6.

And, as neither a nor c, in the present instance, are squares, but b2 — 4ac 196 — 1924 is a square, the given expression can be resolved, by Case 5, into the two following factors, 8x+6 and x + 1.

Let, therefore, 8x2 + 14x + 6 = (8x + 6) (x + 1) =

+1)2, agreeably to the rule there laid down.

=

m2

(x

Then there will arise, by dividing each side by x+1,

[blocks in formation]

And consequently, by multiplication and reduction, we shall

[blocks in formation]

greater than 6.

m2

n

must be less than 8 and

Whence, by taking m = 5, and n = 2, we shall have x=

[blocks in formation]

8 14

400

which makes + +6= = (~2-9)2,

49 7

49

as

6. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 2x22 a square.

=

Here, by comparing this with the general formula ar3 + bx + c, as before, we shall have a = = 2, b O, and c =- 2. And, as neither a nor c are squares, but b2 4ac- 4ac 4 (2 × −2) = 16 is a square, the root of which is 4, the given expression can be resolved, by Case 5, into the two factors 2x2, and x + 1, or 2 (x − 1), and (x + 1), which is evident, indeed, in this case, from inspection.

Let, therefore, 2x2-2 = 2 (x − 1) × (x + 1) =

[blocks in formation]

agreeably to the rule; and there will arise, by division,

m2

2x-2=(x+1). And consequently, by multiplication,

and reducing the result, we shall have x =

[blocks in formation]

by taking n = 1, and m = 1, we shall have x = 3, and 2x2 2 = 16 (4)2; or, taking n = 2 and m= 3, the

[blocks in formation]

But as a enters the problem only in its second power, +17 may be taken instead of - 17; since either of them

[blocks in formation]

7. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 5x2+36x+7 a square.

Here, by comparing the expression with the general formula, we shall have a = 5, b = = 36, and c = 7.

And as neither a nor c are squares, but b2 - 4ac = 1296 140 = 1156 = (34)2 is a square, it can be resolved, as in the last example, into the two factors, 5x + 1, and x + 7. Whence, putting 5x+36x+7=(5x + 1) X (x+7)=

m2

n2

(x+7), there will arise, by dividing, by x+7, 5x+1= n2 (x+7).

m2

And consequently, by multiplication, and reducing the resulting expression, we shall have x =

7m2

5n2

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

mai where,

taking m=2, and n= 1, the substitution will give x=

[merged small][ocr errors]

27, which makes 5 x (27) +36 × 27 +7=

[blocks in formation]

8. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 6x2+13x + 10 a square.

Here, by comparing the given expression with the general formula ax + bx + c, we have a = 6, b13, and c = 10. And as neither a, c, nor b2 4ac, are squares, the question, if possible, can only be resolved by the method pointed out in Case 6.

In order, therefore, to try it in this way, let the first simple square 4, be subtracted from it, and there will remain, in that case, 6x2+13x + 6.

[ocr errors]

=

Then since (13)2 - 4 (6 × 6) 169144 25 is now a square, this part of the formula can be resolved, by Case 5, into the two factors

3+2, and 2x + 3.

Whence, by assuming, according to the rule, 6x2 + 13æ

+ 10 = 4 + (3x + 2) × (2x + 3) = {

4m

n

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

(3x+2)+(3x+2), we shall have, by cancelling

the 4 on each side, and dividing by 3x+2, 2x + 3

4m m2

n

+ (3x+2).-
n3 2

=

And consequently, by multiplying by n2, and transposing the terms, we have 2n2x

[blocks in formation]

2, and n = 3, the result will give x=

; or, if m be taken 13, and n = 17, we shall

4 x 17 x 13 + 2 x (13) — 3 × (17)2

2(17) 3 (13)

-

Which makes 6 x (5)2 + 13 x 5+10=225

required.

355

= 5,

71

(15), as

9. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 13x2+15x+7 a square.

=

Here, by comparing this with the general formula, as before, we have a 13, b = 15, and c = 7. And as neither a, b, nor b2. 4ac, are squares, the answer to the question, if it be resolvable, can only be obtained by Case 6. In order, therefore, to try it in that way, let (1-x)2 or 1 2x + x2 be subtracted from the given expression, and there will remain 12x+17x+6.

=

[ocr errors]

And as (17)2 - 4 (6 × 12), which is 1, is now a square, this part of the formula can be resolved by Case 5, into the two factors 4x+3 and 3x+2. Whence, assuming 13x2+15x+7= (1 − x)2 +(4x+3) × (3x+2) = {(1 − x) +

2m

m2

3x+2) } 2 = 2 = (1 − x )2 + 2TM (1 − x) × (3x+2)+7 7 (3x +

[ocr errors]

n

n

[ocr errors]

2)3, we shall have, by cancelling (1 - x)3, and dividing by

[blocks in formation]

ly, by multiplying by n2, and transposing the terms, there will arise 4n2x + 2mnx 3m2x =2mn + 2m2

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

3n2, or x =

Where, putting m and n each = 1, we shall have x =

[blocks in formation]

13 45 63 1, which makes + +7= + + ==

13 15
9 3

9 9 9

[merged small][ocr errors]

as required.

9

10. It is required to find such a value of x as will make 7x2+2 a square.

Here it is easy to perceive that neither of the former rules will apply.

But as the expression evidently becomes a square when x= 1, let, therefore, x = 1 + y, according to Case 7, and we shall have

7x2+2=9+14y+ 7y3 ;

m

Or, putting 9 +14y+ 7y3 (3 + y), according to the rule,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Hence, rejecting the 9s and dividing the remaining terms by y, we have 7n2y + 14n2 = 6mn + m3y; and consequently,

[blocks in formation]

y=

and x = 1 +

14n2

7n2

m2

;

where it is

7n2 m2 evident that m and n may be any positive or negative numbers

whatever.

[blocks in formation]

y
3
3*
enters the formula, we
x= }, which value makes
a square.

may take, as in a former instance, 7x2 + 2 = 3 + 2 = 3 +12 = 25

1, we shall have x

Or, if m = 3 and n = 17, and 7x2 +2 7 × (17)2 + 2 = 2025 = (45), a square as before. And by proceeding in this manner, we may obtain as many other values of x as we p ease.

= a

PROBLEM 2.-To find such values of x as will make √ (ax3 + bx2 + cx + d) rational, or ax3 + bx2 + cx + d = square. This problem is much more limited and difficult to be resolved than the former; as there are but a few cases of it that admit of answers in rational numbers, and in these the rules for obtaining them are of a very confined nature, being mostly such as are subject to certain limitations, or that admit only of a few simple answers, which, in the instances here mentioned, may be found as follows:

RULE 1.-When the third and fourth terms of the formula are wanting, or c and d are each = 0, put the side of the square sought nx, than ax3 + bx2 = n2x2.

And consequently, by dividing each side of the equation by

x2, we shall have ax + b = n2, or x =

n2 = b

α

be any integral or fractional number whatever. 2. When the last term d is a square, put it

the side of the required square =e+

с

2e

where n may

= e2, and assume

=

x, and the proposed

c2

formula is e2 + ex + bx2 + ax3 = e2 + cx + x2.

4e2

Whence, by expunging the terms e2 + cx, which are common, and dividing by x2, we shall have 4ae2x + 4be2 = c2;

and consequently, x =

c2-4be2

4ae2

C

Or if, the same case, there be put e+ ·x+

2e

4be2 -C

8e3

for the side of the required square, we shall have, by squaring,

« ForrigeFortsett »