Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

THE DECISIONS

OF THE

Supreme Court of the United States,

AT

JANUARY TERM, 1828.

1*]. CLEMENT S. HUNT, Appellant,

V.

CHRISTOPHER RHODES, William Ennis, and
Richard K. Randolph, Administrators of
Lewis Rousmaniere, deceased, Appellees.

but which was not so, will not give the right of in-
terference. [14]

not a ground for reforming a deed founded on such
A mistake arising from ignorance of law, is [2
mistake; except in some few cases, and those of
peculiar characters. [15]

If the obligee of a joint bond, by two or more,
agree with one obligor to release him, and do so,
and all the obligors are thereby discharged at law,

Mistake in written instrument-equity-igno- equity will not afford relief, against the legal con

rance of law-of fact.

It is a principle of equity, that, when an instrument is drawn and executed, which professes, or is intended, to carry into execution an agreement, whether in writing or by parol, previously entered into; but which, by mistake of the draftsman, either in fact or in law, does not fulfill, or which violates the manifest intention of the parties to the agreement; equity will correct the mistake, so as to produce a conformity of the instrument to the agreement. [13]

The execution of instruments, fairly and legally entered into, is one of the peculiar branches of equity jurisdiction; and a court of equity will compel a delinquent party to perform his agreement, according to the terms of it, and to the manifest intention of the parties. [13]

sequences; although the release was given under a
manifest misapprehension of the legal effect of it,
in relation to the other obligors. [16]

It seems, that there may be cases in which a
arising from ignorance of law. But where parties,
court of equity will relieve against a plain mistake,
upon deliberation and advice, reject one species of
security, and agree to select another, under a mis-
apprehension of the law as to the nature of the
security thus selected, a court of equity will not,
ficiency of the security, in consequence of a sub-
on the ground of misapprehension, and the insuf-
sequent event not foreseen, direct a security of a
be done which the parties supposed would have
different character to be given. or decree that to
been effected by the instrument, which was finally
agreed upon.
posed to interfere in such a case, in favor of a par-
The court would be much less dis-
ticular creditor, against the general creditors of an

insolvent estate. [17]

THE

So, if the mistake exist, not in the instrument, which is intended to give effect to the agreement, but in the agreement itself, and is clearly proved to have been the result of ignorance of some material HE appellant filed a bill on the chancery fact; a court of equity will, in general, grant relief, States, for the District of Rhode Island, setting side of the Circuit Court of the United which it is sought. [13] according to the nature of the particular case in forth, that, in January, 1820, Lewis RousmanIf an agreement was not founded on a mistake of iere obtained from him two loans of money, any material fact, and if it was executed in strict amounting, together, to $2,150; and, at the conformity with itself, it would be unprecedented time the first loan was made, Rousmaniere of for a court of equity to decree another security to fered to give, in addition to his notes, a bill of be given, different from that which had been agreed had, in to treat the case as if such other security sale, or mortgage, of his interest in the brig had, in fact, been agreed upon and executed. [14] Nereus, then at sea, as a collateral security for their agreements, but it has no power to make the delivery of the first note, dated 11th of Courts of equity may compel parties to execute the repayment of the money. A few days after January, 1820, he executed a power of attor

agreements for them.

parties, and the consequent inefficiency of the seThe death of one of the

curity selected, intended to be valid and complete, ney, authorizing the plaintiff to make and exe

mistake of law.

to show a mistake in law as a ground for reform-
ing a written instrument founded on such mistake,
Wheaton v.
entered into in good faith, but un-

Wheaton, 9 Conn. 96.

NOTE-Whether equity will relieve against a
of Chief Justice Marshall, when the case, Hunt y.
"It cannot be denied, that some of the positions is the settled law of Connecticut.
Rousmaniere was first before the court, as report-
the Wheaton, 8 Wheat. 174, are greatly shaken by deAgreements en law, are generally held valid in
the learned and elaborate judgment of Mr. Justice equity, and obligatory upon the parties.

Washington, supra, in which all seemed to con-
eur. The case itself cannot be quoted as an au-
thority for relieving against mistakes of law, nor
for the existence of a distinction between igno- ray, 1 John. Ch. 512; Lyon v. Richmond, 2 John.

rance of law, and mistake of the law. Eq. Jur. 62.

Pullen v. Ready, 2 Atk. 591; Stockley v. Stockley, 1 Ves. & B. 23, 30; Frank v. Frank. 1 Ch. Cas. 84; Mildway v. Hungerford, 2 Vern. 243; Shotwell v. MurMillard's Ch. 51; Storrs v. Baker, 6 John. Ch. 109, 170; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. sec. 113, 116 to 138; Clarke v.

The doctrine that parol evidence is inadmissible Dutcher, 9 Con. 674; Irnham v. Child, 1 Bro. Ch.

Feters 1.

[ocr errors][merged small]

XI. It is ordered by the court, That the clerk | ment, h of the court to which any writ of error shall dismiss be directed, may make return of the same, by transmitting a true copy of the record, and of all proceedings in the cause, under his hand and the seal of the court.

February Term, 1797.

XII. It is ordered by the court, That no record of the court be suffered by the clerk to be taken out of his office, but by the consent of the court; otherwise to be responsible for it. August Term, 1797.

XIII. Ordered, That the plaintiff in error be at liberty to show, to the satisfaction of this court, that the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of $2,000, exclusive of costs; this to be made to appear by affidavit, and day's notice to the opposite party, or their counsel, in Georgia. Rule as to affidavits to be mutual. August Term, 1800. XIV. Ordered, That counselors may be admitted as attorneys in this court, on taking the usual oath. August Term, 1801. XV. It is ordered, That in every cause, when the defendant in error fails to appear, the plaintiff may proceed ex-parte.

August Term, 1801.

XVI. It is ordered, That where the writ of error issues within thirty days before the meeting of the court, the defendant is at liberty to enter his appearance, and proceed to trial; otherwise the cause must be continued. February Term,1803.

XVII. In all cases where a writ of error

shall delay the proceedings on the judgment of the Circuit Court, and shall appear to have been sued out merely for delay, damages shall be awarded at the rate of ten per centum per annum, on the amount of the judgment.

February Term, 1803.

XVIII. In such cases, where there exists a real controversy, the damages shall be only at the rate of six per centum per annum. In both cases the interest is to be computed as part of the damages. viii*] *XIX. All causes, the records of which February Term, 1803. shall be delivered to the clerk on or before the sixth day of the term, shall be considered as for trial in the course of that term. Where the record shall be delivered after the sixth day of the term, either party will be entitled to a continuance.

In all cases where a writ of error shall be a supersedeas to a judgment, rendered in any court of the United States (except that for the District of Columbia), at least thirty days previous to the commencement of any term of this court, it shall be the duty of the plaintiff in error to lodge a copy of the record with the clerk of this court, within the first six days of the term; and if he shall fail to do so, the defendant in error shall be permitted, afterwards. to lodge a copy of the record with the clerk, and the cause shall stand for trial, in like manner as if the record had come up within the first six days; or he may, on producing a certificate from the clerk, stating the cause, and that a writ of error has been sued out, which operates as a supersedeas to the judg

24

ments? of Colu this cou In cas it shall

errors a court b the con thereaft clerk, a

if he sh

assign t trial, tl his cost plead to trial, th ment or judgmen

XX. C

not bein give sec court, to

XXI. court pr davits, c

or their the bill this cour attachm sureties said cost XXII.

judgmen the part recover i

XXIII. permitte defendan

XXIV.

all cases court, th court, or shall be States.

proper, i in any ci ing circui

XXV.

pers of a preme Co keeping, may mal original I and this original script of

time juris admissible mony of commissio

XXVI.

from any under the

no such c terrogator

ent, have the said writ of error docketed and smissed. This rule shall apply to all judg ents rendered by the court for the District Columbia, at any time prior to a session of is court.

In cases not put to issue at the August term, shall be the duty of the plaintiff in error, if Fors shall not have been assigned in the

urt below, to assign them in this court, at
ecommencement of the term, or so soon
ereafter as the record shall be filed with the
rk, and the cause placed on the docket; and
he shall fail to do so, and shall also fail to
ign them when the cause shall be called for
al, the writ of error may be dismissed at
cost; and if the defendant shall refuse to
ad to issue, and the cause shall be called for
1, the court may proceed to hear an argu-
at on the part of the plaintiff, and to give
gment according to the rights of the cause.
February Term, 1806.

X. Ordered, That all parties in this court,
being residents of the United States, shall
security for the costs accruing in this
t, to be entered on the record.

February Term, 1808.
XI. Ordered, That upon the clerk of this
producing satisfactory evidence by affi-
Es, or the acknowledgment of the parties,
heir sureties, of having served a copy of
Dill of costs, due by them respectively in
court, on such parties or their sureties, an
-hment shall issue against such parties or
ies respectively, to compel payment of the
costs.
February Term, 1808.

II. Ordered, That upon the reversal of a
ment or decree of the Circuit Court, ['ix
arty in whose favor the reversal is, shall
er his costs in the Circuit Court.

February Term, 1810.

III. Ordered, That only two counsel be
ted to argue for each party, plaintiff and
lant, in a cause. February Term, 1812.
V. It is ordered by the court, That
es where further proof is ordered by tle
the depositions which shall be taken,
e by a commission to be issued from this
or from any Circuit Court of the United
February Term, 1816.

. Whenever it shall be necessary or in the opinion of the presiding judge circuit court, or district court exercis cuit court jurisdiction, that original paany kind should be inspected in the SuCourt upon appeal, such presiding judge ake such rule or order for the safe, transporting, and return of such papers, as to him may seem proper; s court will receive and consider such papers in connection with the tranthe proceedings. February Term, 1817. In all cases of admiralty and mariisdiction, where new evidence shall be le in this court, the evidence by testiE witnesses shall be taken under a on, to be issued from this court, or circuit court of the United States, e direction of any judge thereof; and commission shall issue, but upon in. ries to be filed by the party applying

ORDERS OF COURT.

for the commission, and notice to the opposite | judgment or decree wa party, or his agent or attorney, accompanied cause, and certifying th with a copy of the interrogatories so filed, to appeal had been duly s file cross interrogatories, within twenty days trom the service of such notice. Provided, how

ever, that nothing in this rule shall prevent any party from giving oral testimony in open court in cases where by law it is admissible.

February Term, 1817.

XXVII. After the present term, no cause standing for argument will be heard by the court, until the party shall have furnished the court with a printed brief, or abstract of the cause, containing the substance of all the ma

terial pleadings, facts and documents, on which the parties rely, and the points of law and fact intended to be presented at the argument.

February Term, 1821.

XXVIII. Whenever, pending a writ of error,
or appeal in this court, either party
shall die, the proper representatives in the per-
sonalty or realty of the deceased party, accord-
ing to the nature of the case, may voluntarily
come in and be admitted parties to the suit,
and thereupon the cause shall be heard and de-
termined, as in other cases; and if such repre-
sentatives shall not voluntarily become parties,
then the other party may suggest the death on
the record; and thereupon, on motion, obtain
an order, that, unless such representatives
shall become parties, within the first ten days
of the ensuing term, the party moving for
such order, if defendant in error, shall be en-
titled to have the writ of error or appeal dis-
missed; and if the party so moving, shall be
plaintiff in error, he shall be entitled to open
the record, and, on hearing, have the same re-
versed if it be erroneous. Provided, however,
that a copy of every such order shall be print-
ed in some newspaper, at the seat of govern-
ment, in which the laws of the United States

shall be printed by authority, three successive
weeks, at least sixty days before the beginning
of the term of the Supreme Court, then next
ensuing.
February Term, 1821.

XXX. No cause will

til a complete record s in itself, without refer

papers, exhibits, depos ceedings, which are nece this court.

XXXI. No certiorari

record shall be hereafte unless a motion there founded shall, if not writing, and the facts

party, be verified by a tions for such certiorar *first term of the ent otherwise the same sha less upon special cause counting satisfactorily

XXXII. In all cases o jurisdiction, heard in t shall hereafter be allow admissibility of any de other exhibit, found in unless objection was tal below, and entered of shall otherwise be dee mitted by consent.

the sitting of the cour XXXIII. On Saturda required by the rules o the docket, shall be er shall have entered upon such motions shall be upon the docket.

XXXIV. Ordered, T

term, no original recor

the Supreme Court roo the clerk of this court.

There having been o tion, It is ordered, Th the Supreme Court app ment be made of the C sociate justices of the Congress in such cases among the circuits, ag

For the first circuit
For the second cir

XXIX. In all cases where a writ of error, or an appeal shall be brought to this court, from any judgment or decree rendered thirty days before the term to which such writ of error or appeal shall be returnable, it shall be the duty of the plaintiff in error, or appellant, as the case may be, to docket the cause, and file the record thereof, with the clerk of this court, Thompson. within the first six days of the term; on failare to do which the defendant in error, or ap- Washington. peilee, as the case may be, may docket the ause, and file a copy of the record with the Duval. For the fourth circ erk, and thereupon the cause shall stand for

For the third circu

For the fifth circuit

For the sixth circu

trial, in like manner as if the record had been shall, Ch. Justice. duly filed within the first six days of the term; (at his option, he may have the cause dock Johnson. ted and dismissed, upon producing a certifi

For the seventh cir

ate from the clerk of the court, wherein the Trimble.

JUDGES

OF THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE U

DURING THE TIME OF THES

The HON. JOHN MARSHALL, Chief Jusi The HON. BUSHROD WASHINGTON, Ass The HON. WILLIAM JOHNSON, Associat The HON. GABRIEL DUVAL, Associate Ju The HON. JOSEPH STORY, Associate Ju The HON. SMITH THOMPSON, Associate The HON. ROBERT TRIMBLE, Associate J WILLIAM WIRT, ESQ., Attorney-Genera WILLIAM THOMAS CARROLL, ESQ., Cler States.

TENCH RINGOLD, ESQ., Marshal.

« ForrigeFortsett »