Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washington, Volum 197Bancroft-Whitney Company, 1938 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 84
Side 408
... VERDICT CONTRARY TO EVIDENCE - DIS- CRETION OF COURT . Whether or not a verdict should be set aside as against the evidence is peculiarly within the discre- tion of the trial judge , and the appellate court will not inter- fere with his ...
... VERDICT CONTRARY TO EVIDENCE - DIS- CRETION OF COURT . Whether or not a verdict should be set aside as against the evidence is peculiarly within the discre- tion of the trial judge , and the appellate court will not inter- fere with his ...
Side 742
... VERDICT . A judgment notwith- standing the verdict of a jury may be given only where there is no evidence or reasonable inference from the evidence to sustain the verdict . Gibson v . Spokane United Railways .. 58 SAME ENFORCEMENT ...
... VERDICT . A judgment notwith- standing the verdict of a jury may be given only where there is no evidence or reasonable inference from the evidence to sustain the verdict . Gibson v . Spokane United Railways .. 58 SAME ENFORCEMENT ...
Side 773
... verdict , see NEW TRIAL . Directing verdict in civil actions , see TRIAL , 1 , 2 . Advisory verdict in equitable action , effect , see TRIAL , 6 . Advisory verdict in will contest , effect , see WILLS , 2 . Vested Right : In blind ...
... verdict , see NEW TRIAL . Directing verdict in civil actions , see TRIAL , 1 , 2 . Advisory verdict in equitable action , effect , see TRIAL , 6 . Advisory verdict in will contest , effect , see WILLS , 2 . Vested Right : In blind ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirmed alleged amount appellant appellant's application arthritis attorney authority automobile bonds Bridgham Brotherhood chapter claim Claire Richardson collision concur constitution contends contract contributory negligence defendant Department of Labor directed verdict Dissenting Opinion employees entered evidence facts favor Federal feet filed funds Grays Harbor county guilty held highway injury instructions issue judgment jury King county liability license lien ment motion negligence officers Opinion Per BEALS Opinion Per BLAKE Opinion Per GERAGHTY Opinion Per HOLCOMB Opinion Per MILLARD Opinion Per ROBINSON Opinion Per SIMPSON Opinion Per STEINERT ordinance paid parties payment person Pierce County plaintiff question reason Reported in 85 respondent respondent's rule Seattle sewer Spokane county Stat statute superior court supra sustained testified testimony Thurston county tion toll bridge trial court truck trust union United verdict Wash Washington William Hahn