A Treatise on the Law of Damages for Personal Injuries: Embrasing a Consideration of the Principles Regulating the Primary Question of Liability, as Well as the Measure and Elements of Recovery After Liability Established

Forside
Michie Company, 1901 - 944 sider
 

Innhold

CHAPTER VIII
96
84 Illustrations
97
Recovery though Plaintiffs Act Itself Dangerous
98
Plaintiffs Mistake or Error of Judgment
99
Contributory Negligence
101
Defendant Liable Though No Injury Would Have Been Sus tained but for Plaintiffs Act
103
Extent and Limits of RuleReasonable Efforts
104
Where Danger Not Due to Defendants Misconduct
107
Questions for JuryHow Determined
108
EvidenceFact That Others Pursued Same Course as Plaintiff
109
Where Issue Not Made by Pleadings
110
CHAPTER IX
112
Doctrine Permitting Recovery
115
Efforts to Save Anothers LifeGeneral Rule
119
IllustrationsLeading Case
120
Efforts of Mother to Prevent Injury to Child
121
Extent and Limits of RuleAct of Rescuer Must Not Be Rash or Reckless
122
Whether Rescuers Act Reasonable Question for Jury
123
Negligence of Person Rescued
124
Negligence of Rescuer in Creating Condition of Danger
126
Injuries to Third Persons in Efforts to Save Particular In dividual
127
CHAPTER X
129
Illustrations
130
Further IllustrationsConflict of Cases
131
Where Act of Child Contributes to His Own Injury
134
Sale of Explosives
135
Sale of Dangerous Instruments or Substances to Minor Mere Fact of Minority
136
Extent and Limits of Rule
137
Necessity for Special PleaEvidence
139
CHAPTER XI
140
149 Need Not Be Foreseen What Person Will Be Injured
149
CHAPTER XII
150
CHAPTER XIII
158
Physician or Surgeon Furnished by Carrier to Injured Pas
169
Doctrine That All Damages Resulting Directly from Tort
195
Rationale of Foregoing
203
CHAPTER XVI
227
Extent and Limits of Rule
237
Duty to Submit to Surgical Operation
239
Where Damages Increased or Aggravated by Plaintiff
241
Injuries Received in Efforts to Avoid or Diminish In juries
243
Instructions
245
Necessity for Special Plea
246
Burden of Proof
247
Distinction between Cases Where Plaintiff Merely Aggravates Injuries Already Sustained and Where He Contributes to Original Cause
248
CHAPTER XVII
250
Aggravation of Existing Disease
252
Doctrine That Defendant Not Liable
254
Defendants Knowledge of Plaintiffs Condition
257
Actions for Hastening Death
258
Same SubjectAction under Particular Statute
259
Pleading
260
Rules in Present Connection Not Inconsistent with Gen eral Principles
261
CHAPTER XVIII
262
Epilepsy
263
Blood Poisoning
264
Pulmonary Consumption from Blow in Chest
265
Increase of Liability to Contract or Diminution of Ability to Resist Disease
266
Not Necessary That Disease Should Be Probable Conse quence of Injuries
267
Latent Tendency to Disease
268
220 Predisposition to Cancer
270
Organic Tendency to Scrofula
271
Causal Connection between Injuries and Disease
272
Illustration of Foregoing
273
Mere Fact of Existence of Disease
274
Causal Connection Question of Fact for Jury
275
Pleading
276
CHAPTER XIX
279
Consequences of a Contrary Rule
281
Illustrations of General RuleInjuries to Trespassers
282
The No Duty to Trespassers Doctrine
284
Injuries to Infant Trespassers
290
Turntable Cases
296
Violation of Highway Laws and Ordinances
298
Violation of Sunday LawsGeneral Rule
299
Injuries of Highways
300
Act of Plaintiff Neither Defense Nor Matter in Mitigation
301
Statutory Changes and Modifications of Foregoing
303
Whether Fact of Illegality of Plaintiffs Act Admissible in Evidence
304
What Acts of Plaintiff in Violation of Law Will Defeat Right of Recovery
305
Question of Fact for Jury
307
To What Extent and for What Purposes Illegality of Plain tiffs Act May Be Considered
308
CHAPTER XX
314
Introductory
315
Violation of Statute or Ordinance as Constituting Negli genceNegligence Per Se
316
Criticism of Terms of Negligence Per Se Rule
317
Domestic
318
Prima Facie Negligence
319
Evidence of Statute or Ordinance on Question of Negli gence
321
Actionable Negligence
322
Some Evidence of Negligence
324
Natural and Proximate Cause
325
Where Violation of Statute or Ordinance Per Se Negli gence
327
Question of Fact for Jury
328
Contributory Negligence 329
329
For What Purposes and to What Extent Fact of Violation of Statute or Ordinance May Be Considered
330
Consequences Intended to Be Provided A gainst
334
Same Subject ContinuedWhen Question of Fact for Jury
338
Public DutyPrivate Injury Rule
345
Duty Created towards Particular Persons or Classes
347
Contributory Negligence
350
Plaintiffs Presumption of Defendants Compliance with Law or Ordinance
351
Presumption vs Apparent Facts
353
Presumption as Affecting Defendants Negligence
354
Alleged Distinction between Statute and Ordinance
355
Statutes or Ordinances Which Impose a Specific Penalty for Violation or Omit Specifically to Impose Civil Liability
356
Injunction to Prevent in Addition to Penalty for Violation
358
Evidence of Conflicting Ordinances
359
Evidence of Ordinance and ViolationOrder of Proof
360
Admissibility of Evidence of Violation of Statute or Ordi nance under General Averments of Negligence
361
Doctrine That Evidence of Violation of Statute or Ordi nance Inadmissible
362
CHAPTER XXI
363
Absolute Certainty Not RequiredReasonable Certainty Sufficient
364
Remote Possibilities
365
Uncertainty as to Origin or Cause
366
Illustrations of Foregoing
367
Uncertainty as to Extent
370
Illustrations of Foregoing
371
Where Several Methods of Computing Damages
372
Where Case Affords Just and Certain Rule
373
Where Damages Insusceptible of Certain Measure
374
Damages in Discretion of JuryPunitive Damages
375
Burden of Proof
378
PROSPECTIVE DAMAGESFUTURE CONSEQUENCES
380
Necessity for Special Allegation
383
Reasonable Certainty Necessary
384
What Rule of Reasonable Certainty Requires
386
Permanent Injuries
387
Necessity for Allegation of Permanency
390
Damages Sustained between Institution of Suit and Trial
392
CHAPTER XXIII
393
Compensation or IndemnityWhen Matter of Discretion
395
Criticism of Rule of CompensationElements Insusceptible of Pecuniary Measure
397
Elements Susceptible of Money Valuation
399
Jury to Be Guided by the EvidenceArbitrary Discretion
400
Jury Not to Consider What Amount of Damages Will Carry Costs
401
Illustration of ForegoingLoss of Eyesight
403
InstructionsDiscretion of Jury
404
Instruction Limiting Jury to Amount Claimed
407
CHAPTER XXIV
408
tions
409
Rule as to Excessive Damages
410
Reluctance of Court to Interfere
411
Doctrine That Excessiveness Alone Not Sufficient to War rant Judicial Interference
413
Fact That Verdict Seems Too High
414
Passion Prejudice SympathyDoctrine That Must Be Unreasonable
415
Function of Appellate Court
417
When Verdict Will Be Set Aside
420
Observations with Reference to Corporation Defendant
422
Peremptory Reduction of Verdict by Court
423
337 Remittitur Where Verdict So Excessive as to Indicate Pas sion or Prejudice
424
Where Verdict in Excess of Amount Claimed
427
Remittitur as Curing Improper Admission of Exclusion of Evidence
428
Where No Certain Measure of DamagesGeneral Rule
429
Contrary Doctrine
430
Objection to Practice of Remittitur on Constitutional Grounds
432
Rule as to Inadequate Damages
433
Mere Fact of Inadequacy
435
Where Verdict Demonstrably Too Small
436
Where Recoverable Element Ignored or Overlooked
438
Function of Appellate CourtNorth Carolina Rule
439
Increasing Amount of Verdict
440
Conflict of Evidence
441
Evidence to Be ExcludedQualification
442
CHAPTER XXV
444
Same Cause
445
Difference in Present and Past Value of Money
446
Damages for Total and Permanent Disability
447
Injuries to EyesLoss of Sight
448
Loss of Legs
449
Loss of Use of Legs
451
Injuries to Knee or Ankle
455
Loss of Feet
457
Loss of and Injuries to Arms
459
Miscellaneous
464
CHAPTER XXVI
469
Measure
471
Future Pain and Suffering
474
Rule of Reasonable CertaintyDegree of Certainty Re quired
475
Natural and Proximate Cause
491
Mental Suffering Alone as a Cause of Action
495
Necessity for Contemporaneous Bodily Injury
497
Rule Not Satisfied Though Bodily Injuries Subsequently Ensue
498
What Constitutes Bodily Injury under Foregoing Rule
500
Wanton and Intentional Wrongs
502
Rationale of RuleConsiderations of Policy
503
Observations upon Foregoing Rule
504
Distinction between Actions for Mental Suffering Alone and Where Physical Injuries Subsequently Ensue
506
Physical Injuries SustainedMental Suffering from Differ ent Source
509
Doctrine That Contemporaneous Physical Injuries Unnec essary
510
Mental Suffering for Physical Injuries to AnotherSympa thetic Mental Suffering
512
Action by Parent for Injuries to Child
513
Actions for Seduction Abduction etc
515
Injury to Parental FeelingsDoctrine That Damages Recoverable
516
Action by Husband for Injuries to Wife
517
Anxiety as to Future Support of Family
520
Anxiety for Safety of Others
521
Mental Suffering in Actions for Torts to Property
523
Actions for Breach of Contract
528
Same SubjectDoctrine That Damages for Mental Suffer ing Recoverable Where Natural and Proximate Conse quence
529
Same SubjectIllustrations
530
Contracts to Marry
531
Future Mental Suffering
532
Rule of Reasonable Certainty
533
Several Sorts of Mental Suffering
534
Mental Suffering as Incident of Bodily Pain
535
Presumption as to Such Suffering
537
Necessity for Special Allegation
538
428 Mental Suffering for Disfigurement of Person
539
Doctrine That Damages Not Recoverable
542
Shame Humiliation Sense of Indignity and Insult
543
Actions of Assault and Battery
544
Indecent Assault
546
Ejection of Passengers
547
Annoyance Vexation Disappointment
549
Sorrow Grief Sentimental Distress
552
Illustrations
553
Necessity for Bodily Injury
555
Necessity for Evidence of Mental Suffering
556
Doctrine That Such Evidence Inadmissible
557
View That Such Evidence Not Incompetent
558
Evidence of Plaintiffs Condition in LifeFormer Appear ance
559
Motive of WrongdoerEvidence of Wrongful Intent
560
Wrongful Intent Not Necessary
561
Telegraph Cases
562
Action Either in Tort or Contract
563
Doctrine That Damages for Mental Suffering May Be Recovered
564
Illustrations
565
Further Illustrations
566
Alleged Distinction between Mental Suffering Caused by Delay in Delivery and That Which Prompt Delivery Would Have Relieved
568
CHAPTER XXVIII
576
CHAPTER XXIX
583
CHAPTER XXX
616
CAPAC
622
Qualification of Foregoing
630
Averment of Particular Business or Engagement
644
Nature of Plaintiffs LiabilityStatute of Limitations
659
Whether Physician Licensed Practitioner
660
Burden of Proof
661
Where Services Gratuitously RenderedDoctrine That Value Recoverable
662
Contrary Doctrine
663
Expenses Paid by Third Person
664
Necessity for Special Allegation
665
Allegation of Amount
667
Expense of Employment of Substitutes or Assistants
669
Doctrine That Such Expenses Recoverable
670
False ImprisonmentMalicious Prosecution etc
671
Stated Rationale of Rule
673
View That Liability for Exemplary Damages Has No Bear ing on Question
674
Defense against Act of AnotherRemedy Over
676
Actual Payment of Fees Unnecessary
677
CHAPTER XXXII
680
Amount of Recovery
681
Assignability
682
Cause of Action Arising under Foreign Statute
683
Averment and Proof of Foreign Law
684
Presumption as to Existence of Common Law
685
CHAPTER XXXIII
686
Pleading the Contract
687
Whether and When Form of Action Material or Important
688
Breach of Contract of CarriageLimited Rule Applied
689
576 Action Construed to Be TortMore Extended Rule
690
Doctrine That Same Rule as to Remoteness Applies in Con tract and in Tort
691
Action for Personal Injuries Transitory in Nature
695
Allegation of Venue
696
Where Injury to Person and Property Results from Same Act or Omission
697
Doctrine of Two Causes of Action
700
Joinder of Statutory and CommonLaw Rights of Action
701
Joinder of Tort and ContractRepugnancy
702
EVIDENCE AND Burden of PROOF
705
Declarations as to Cause of Injuries
706
Evidence of Moral Character
707
Action for Assault and BatteryConduct of Bystanders
709
Same SubjectSimilarity of Circumstance and Condition
710
Same SubjectObjections to Admissibility
712
Probable Duration of Life
713
Same SubjectMortuary Tables
714
Burden of Proof
716
CHAPTER XXXV
718
Expert Testimony
720
Reason and Grounds for Opinion
722
Examination of WitnessesWeight of Testimony
723
Opinions of Experts Involving Speculation or Conjecture
724
CHAPTER XXXVI
725
Consequences of Contrary Doctrine
727
Absence of Exclamations
728
Rationale of Rule
730
Where Action Pending When Examination Made
731
Distinction between Involuntary Exclamations and Mere Declarations Descriptive Statements or Expressions of Opinion
732
CHAPTER XXXVII
736
Same SubjectCases Where Such Evidence Admitted
740
Disfigurement of PersonLoss of Enjoyment of Life
744
Injuries to ChildrenEmployment of AttendantsContrib utory Negligence
745
Where Punitive Damages Recoverable
748
Evidence of Defendants WealthRule in Case of Punitive Damages
750
Same SubjectWhere Punitive Damages Not Recoverable
751
Several Defendants Sued Jointly
752
How Defendants Wealth ShownNecessity for Evidence
753
Evidence of Defendants Lack of Means
754
Evidence of All Circumstances Surrounding Both Parties
756
CHAPTER XXXVIII
758
Reason of Rule
764
Repairs or Precautions by Third Person
767
Qualifications of General Rule
769
Evidence in Explanation of View Diagram or Photograph
772
Ownership and ControlDuty to Repair
775
Instructions
776
Same SubjectNo Objection to Evidence
777
Jurisdictions in Which Evidence of Subsequent Repairs and Precautions Held Admissible
778
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
782
Contrib
795
Ons Held
802
PLEADING AND PRACTICE
814
Application of Rule in Particular Cases
820
Requisite Particularity of Averment
823
General Damages Occurring Since Institution of Action
824
Specific Averments of General Damages
825
Wilful Injuries
826
Averment of Negligence
827
Itemizing the Damages
831
VarianceNecessity for Proof of Everything Alleged
832
Pleading Matters of Evidence
834
Anticipating Matters of Defense
838
LimitationsAmendments
839
Quotient Verdicts
840
CHAPTER XLII
841
Rule in Georgia
843
Rule in VirginiaPractice Approved
844
CHAPTER XLIII
845
Introductory
846
Objection to Doctrine of Punitive Damages
847
Fact That Defendants Act Is Punishable as a Criminal Offense
848
Jurisdictions in Which Punitive Damages Denied
850
Jurisdictions in Which Punitive Damages AllowedState ment of General Rule
851
Rationale of Doctrine
853
Necessity for Actual Damages
855
Nominal Damages
856
Malice or Intent to Injure
857
What Constitutes Malice
859
Malice Not Presumed from Illegality
860
Acts Done under Mistaken Sense of Right or Duty
861
Persons Incapable of Intent in Law
862
Rule in Negligence Cases
863
Liability of Principal for Act of AgentDoctrine That No Distinction between Punitive and Compensatory Dam ages
868
Express Antecedent Authority or Subsequent Ratification
870
Liability by Ratification
871
What Constitutes Ratification
872
Liability of Corporate Principals
875
Actions against Personal Representatives
877
Where Several Defendants Are Sued Jointly
878
Mitigation of Punitive Damages
879
Alleged Benefits to Plaintiff
881
Discretion of Jury as to Amount
883
Pleading
885
INDEX
889
quencesCharacter of Message as Indicated by Its Terms 568
942
Opphavsrett

Andre utgaver - Vis alle

Vanlige uttrykk og setninger

Populære avsnitt

Side 563 - ... such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties, at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach of it.
Side 196 - But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.
Side 563 - Where two parties have made a contract which one of them has broken, the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally — ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself — or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation...
Side 275 - The argument is not sound which seeks to trace this immediate cause of the death through the previous stages of mental aberration, physical suffering, and eight months' disease and medical treatment to the original accident on the railroad. Such a course of possible or even logical argument would lead back to that " great first cause least understood," in which the train of all causation ends.
Side 700 - I do not in the least deny; but it seems to me a subtlety not warranted by law to hold that a man cannot bring two actions, if he is injured in his arm and in his leg, but can bring two, if besides his arm and leg being injured his trousers which contain his leg, and his coatsleeve which contains his arm, have been torn.
Side 181 - ... that he knows, or has reasonable means of knowing, that consequences not usually resulting from the act are, by reason of some existing cause, likely to intervene so as to occasion damage to a third person. Where there is no reason to expect it, and no knowledge in the person doing the wrongful act that such a state of things exists as to render the damage probable, if injury does result to a third person it is generally considered that the wrongful act is not the proximate cause of the injury...
Side 783 - No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.
Side 510 - It Is a matter of general knowledge that an attack of sudden fright or an exposure to Imminent peril has produced In Individuals a complete change In their nervous system, and rendered one who was physically strong and vigorous weak and timid.
Side 698 - It results from this principle, and the rule is fully established, that an entire claim, arising either upon a contract or from a wrong, cannot be divided and made the subject of several suits; and if several suits be brought for different parts of such a claim, the pendency of the first may be pleaded in abatement of the others, and a judgment upon the merits in either will be available as a bar in the other suits.
Side 855 - By the common as well as by statute law, men are often punished for aggravated misconduct or lawless acts by means of a civil action, and the damages, inflicted by way of penalty or punishment, given to the party injured. In many civil actions, such as libel, slander, seduction, etc., the wrong done to the plaintiff is incapable of being measured by a money standard...

Bibliografisk informasjon