CAUSES in which the decisions contained in Hun's Reports, and in the Appellate Division Reports, have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals. ANDERSON v. BLOOD..... HUN, VOL. PAGE. 86 244 Order affirmed and final judgment ordered in favor of the respondents: 9 App. Div. 536 HUN, VOL. PAGE. 78 352 FOSTER . BOOKWALTER. PEOPLE EX REL. D., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. COUNTY COURT..... 4 App. Div. 542 Order affirmed: 152 N. Y. 214. PEOPLE v. GILES... 12 App. Div. 495 Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Court of Sessions affirmed: 152 N. Y. 136. ..... 14 App. Div. 188 PEOPLE v. HAWKER.. 9 App. Div. 58 Judgment and order reversed and motion for a mandamus denied: 152 The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.)-[REP. |