 A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it be corroborated by such other evidence as shall tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission...  The Pacific Reporter - Side 3001907Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1842 - 742 sider
...testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense ; and the corroboration is not sufficient, if it merely shows that the offense was committed, and the circumstances thereof." It is submitted by the Attorney-General,... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1860 - 688 sider
...the accomplice shall be corroborated by such other testimony as shall tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration...sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offence or the circumstances thereof. Code, section 2998. The corroborating evidence in this case tended... | |
 | California - 1872 - 698 sider
...itself, and without tliejud of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant wiHTthe commission of the offense; and the corroboration is not sufficient, if it me the commission of the oifense, or the circ thereof. NOTE. — Founded upon Sec. 3T"> Practice Act... | |
 | California - 1874 - 712 sider
...and without the aid accomplice °f ^'e testimony of the accomplice, tends to couneot the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration...commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof. NOTE. — Founded upon Sec. 375 of the Criminal Practice Act of 1851, which rend ns follows: tnsiiuiony... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1874 - 776 sider
...unless such testimony is corroborated by such other testimony as shall tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense ; and the corroboration...commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof. But this rule of evidence does not apply if you find that Meeks was not an accomplice but a detective."... | |
 | Nicholas St. John Green - 1879 - 838 sider
...such other testimony as shall tend to connect the de" fendant with the commission of the offence ; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offence, or the circumstances thereof. But this rule of evidence does not apply if you find that Meeks... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1875 - 866 sider
...unless such testimony is corroborated by such other testimony as shall tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration...commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof. But this rule of evidence does not apply if you find that Meeks was not an accomplice, but a detective."... | |
 | California, Theodore Henry Hittell - 1876 - 986 sider
...which in itself, and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant 14.112. If the evidence show higher offense than the one charged, proceedings to be had thereon. SEC.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1890 - 716 sider
...in itself, and. without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration...commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof." Grim. Proc. Act, sec. 273, (Laws 1878, p. 118). The testimony of Kose W. Kershaw shows that Mary E.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1908 - 604 sider
...tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration shall not be sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof." The court further charged the jury as follows: "(7) If you find from all the evidence in the case that... | |
| |
