commission of offence is cured by the 6 & 7 Vict. c. 83, s. 2.
It is not necessary that a coroner's jury should all be sworn at the same time, or all view the body at the same time, or that they should be sworn super visum corporis. Reg. v. Ingham, 508.
MUTINY ACT.
Homicide under, App. xxix.
NAVAL STORES.
Act for better protection of, App. xxii.
The prisoner's unmarried daughter, aged eighteen, having for some time previously gone out to service, and occasionally returned to live with her mother and stepfather, at such times working at glove-making in order to earn her subsistence, was confined with child at her stepfather's house, and the prisoner, her mother, purposely neglected to procure a midwife or other proper person to attend her daughter when she was taken in labour, and by reason thereof she died in childbirth :
Held, that there was no legal duty on the prisoner to procure proper assistance under the circumstances, and therefore that she was not guilty of manslaughter. Reg. v. Shepherd, 123.
NIGHT POACHING.
On the trial of an indictment for night poaching. under the 9 Geo.4, c. 69, ss. 4, 9, it is not suf- ficient to produce the warrant only under which the prisoners were apprehended, for the purpose of proving that the proceedings were commenced within twelve months of the commission of the offence, but the infor- mation in writing should also be produced. Reg. v. Parker and Smith, 475.
Obstructing highway by telegraph posts, 174. Obstruction by street tramways, 180.
By sect. 23 of the 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96 (Larceny Act), it is enacted that, whosoever shall un- lawfully and wilfully kill, wound, or take any house-dove or pigeon, under such circum- stances as shall not amount to larceny at common law, shall, on conviction, &c.:
Held, that this provision does not apply to a case where a party, under a claim of right, kills a pigeon which is doing mischief upon his land.
A., the occupier of land, gave notice to B., who kept pigeons, that such pigeons did damage to his land, and that he would de- stroy them if they were not restrained. After this notice, finding the pigeons on his land, he fired his gun, whereupon they rose; he then fired again and killed one of them, and being convicted upon an information laid under the above section:
Held, that such conviction was bad. Tay- lor (app.) v. Newman (resp.), 314.
On the hearing of the summons taken out by A., for an order of affiliation on H. of a bastard child born in March, A. was asked in cross-examination whether she had not had carnal connection with C. in the pre- vious September. She denied it. The justices wrongly allowed C. to be called to contradict her, and he swore that he had connectionwith her in the September previous. C. was afterwards indicted and convicted for perjury in having sworn that in the Septem- ber previous he had had connection with A:
Held by eleven judges (Martin, B. and Crompton, J. dubitantibus), that although C.'s evidence was inadmissible in point of law, yet having been admitted and being relevant to the credit of a material witness in the cause, perjury could be assigned upon it. Reg. v. Gibbons, 105.
An illegitimate child being filius nullius, an indictment charging the defendant with taking a false oath before a surrogate and alleging that G. E. was the natural and law- ful father of E. E. and that his consent was necessary as such father under the 4 Geo. 4 c. 76, cannot be sustained. Reg. v. Fair- lie, 209.
Act for relief of certain persons from, App. ix. An indictment alleged that the cause came on to be heard and was duly tried by a jury:"
PARENT AND CHILD.
Neglect to provide medical assistance for daughter, 123.
PAROCHIAL ASSESSMENTS.
Act for regulating, App. xlvii.
Held, sufficient, although no verdict given, the trial ending in a nonsuit. Reg. v. Bray,
A feme sole obtained a judgment in the G. County Court, and then married S. She afterwards took out a judgment-summons in
her name when sole, in L. County Court, without having made her husband a party to the judgment. At the hearing of the summons the judge of the L. Court amended the summons by striking out the name of the plaintiff, and substituting S. and wife. After the alteration the defendant was sworn and examined, and committed perjury. He was then indicted and found guilty of perjury:
Held, that the amendment was without jurisdiction, and that there being no cause in the altered name, the conviction could not be supported. Reg. v. Pearce, 258. An indictment for perjury in making a false
declaration under 5 & 6 Will. 4, c. 62, s. 18, cannot be sustained when the deed or written instrument of which the declaration is con- firmatory is not duly proved. Reg. v. Cox,
To an indictment for perjury, on the hearing of an information before justices, under the 11 & 12 Vict. c. 49, for keeping open an inn for the sale of beer to persons not being travellers, before half-past twelve o'clock on Sunday afternoon, it was objected by counsel that the justices had no jurisdiction, and that the 11 & 12 Vict. c. 49, was repealed, and for this Whiteley v. Heaton (72 L. J. 217, M.C.) was cited:
Held, on the authority of Harris v. Jenns (3 L. T. Rep. N.S., 408), that the 11 & 12 Vict. c. 49, was not repealed, and therefore that the justices had jurisdiction. Reg. v. Mary Senior, 469.
On the trial of an indictment for perjury, alleged to have been committed on the trial of an indictment for an assault, all the evidence that was admissible on the trial of the indictment for the assault is admissible on the trial of the indictment for perjury. Reg. v. Harrison, 503.
Act for regulating administration of, App. i.
Arrest by-Assault-Warrant, 127.
POST OFFICE.
See LARCENY.
Twenty-four prostitutes and fifty men re- mained at the bar of a public-house for an hour or more. The women were disorderly, and some of them swearing. At a later hour the same evening fifty prostitutes and sixty men were there, some of the prosti-
tutes being the same as were there at the earlier part of the evening. Several of the same prostitutes were proved to have been in the same house on other evenings. The defendant was present on these occasions:
Held, that this was sufficient evidence of knowingly permitting and suffering persons of notoriously bad character to assemble and meet together in the house, contrary to the Excise licence granted under 9 Geo. 4, c. 61:
Held, also, that an information for such offence was a criminal proceeding, and that the defendant was not admissible as a wit- ness upon the hearing of it. Parker v. Green, 169.
On the trial of an information filed by the Attorney-General, charging the defendant with bribery at an election, the principal witness for the prosecution refused answer certain questions, and was committed for contempt, and the judge discharged the jury without giving a verdict.
The defendant had pleaded not guilty, and he now desired to plead in addition the several matters which occurred at the trial:
Held, that he could not do so, as he would then be pleading double, but that the whole facts might be set out on the record, so that he might take any steps he might be advised in a court of error. Reg. v. Charlesworth, 40.
Where, in an indictment for perjury, the Attorney-General enters a nolle prosequi on the part of the Crown, he does so on his own responsibility, and this court will not interfere. Reg. v. Allen, 120.
The court refused to set aside on motion a plea of justification pleaded to counts of a criminal information for words spoken of and to a person acting magisterially, leaving the party to demur if he thought fit. Reg. v. John Rea, 401.
Venue in false pretences, 94.
Misjoinder of counts-Time for objecting,
In criminal information --Plea of justification to counts for words spoken, 401. Vexatious Indictments Act—Averment of per- formance of conditions, 483.
The prisoner was charged with uttering, &c.. having been before convicted of felony. The old Act provided that the previous con- viction should be proved first at the trial: the 24 & 25 Vict. c. 99, directs that the prisoner shall not be arraigned upon the
previous conviction till the subsequent felony shall have been disposed of. The 3rd sec- tion of the Repealing Act, 24 & 25 Vict. c. 95, considered as to proceedings at trial of offences committed before 1st Novem- ber, 1861:
Held, by the Recorder and the Common Serjeant, that the 3rd section of the Re- pealing Act directs that the proceedings at the trial of offences committed before 1st November, 1861, shall be in accordance with the rules observed till that time. Reg. v. Montrion, 27.
priety complain of the appearance of par- tiality on the part of any of the jurymen, but to do so in violent and abusive language, or in a violent manner and for the purpose of insult, and in a spite of admonition from the court, is a contempt. Ex parte Pater, 544. Accessory after the fact, 242. Misjoinder of counts-Time for objecting- Election, 261.
Statement for the prosecution in murder, 404. Referring witness to his deposition, 409.
Act for aiding discharged, App. xviii. Act for better instruction of, App. Ivi.
QUEEN'S PRISON. Act for regulating, App. ii.
On the trial of an information filed by the Attorney-General under the Corrupt Prac- tices Act, charging the defendant with bribery at a parliamentary election, the principal witness for the prosecution refused to answer certain questions, and was com- mitted for contempt of court, and the judge discharged the jury without giving a verdict. The court discharged a rule nisi calling on the Crown to show cause why judgment Act for facilitating proof of title to, App. xix. should not be entered for the defendant, and that he be dismissed and discharged from the premises and depart without any day, and why the award of jury process and all other proceedings for a second trial should not be stayed. Reg. v. Charlesworth, 44.
A judge is not bound to record a verdict which does not amount to guilty or not guilty, un- less the jury request him to record it.
Upon an indictment for false pretences, the jury found the prisoner guilty of obtain- ing the property by the false pretences alleged, but added, that they thought he meant to pay for it.
The judge refused to receive such verdict, and told them they must find the prisoner guilty or not guilty, and left the facts again for their consideration:
Held, that a verdict of guilty which they then found was sustainable. Reg. v. Meany,
The counsel for the prosecution opening no case against one prisoner, statements made by that prisoner not to be used except in a regular way of evidence. Reg. v. Gardner and Humbler, 332.
Counsel is not to state in his address to jury statements made by prisoner after his arrest. Reg. v. Bodkin, 404.
A court of quarter sessions has power to fine a barrister for contempt of court, even though committed by him in what he believes to be the legitimate exercise of his professional duty.
But if the court of quarter session fines for contempt of court without any reasonable ground, this court will interfere.
Counsel has a right to, and may with pro-
The principal felon, during the prisoner's absence, left the stolen property with the prisoner's wife, who gave him sixpence on account. Afterwards the principal felon and the prisoner met and agreed on the price, and the prisoner paid the balance. Guilty knowledge as to the property having been stolen was inferred from the other circum- stances of the case:
Held, that the receipt was not complete till the principal felon and the prisoner had agreed as to the price, and that the prisoner knowing then that the property was stolen. was properly convicted of teloniously receiv- ing. Reg. v. Woodward, 95.
The prisoner lodged at the prosecutor's house about a year, and then left, but at what time and in what manner did not appear. On the next day the prosecutor's wife left with a small bundle. The articles mentioned in the indictment were then missed by the prosecutor, and were of too great bulk to have been contained in the bundle taken by the wife. Two days afterwards the prisoner was apprehended in company with the pro- secutor's wife on board a vessel bound for Quebec, the wife passing by the prisoner's name; and the missing articles being found part in the prisoner's cabin, and some on his person:
Held, that the prisoner could properly be convicted upon this evidence of feloniously receiving the articles, well knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen by a certain evil-disposed person. Reg. v. Deer, 225. A husband and wife were jointly indicted for
stealing and receiving, and the jury found the wife guilty of stealing without any con- straint on the husband's part, and the hus- band guilty of receiving the stolen property, knowing at the time when the property was delivered to him that it had been stolen by his wife:
Held, that the husband was properly con- victed of receiving. Reg. v. M'Athey, 251.
REFRESHMENT HOUSES.
Knowingly suffering prostitutes to assemble at and continue in and upon the premises- Sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction. Belasco v. Hannant, Barton v. Hannant, 203.
REGISTRATION OF BIRTH. False statement to registrar of the birth of a child. Reg. v. Hotine, 146.
to C. for brass. Then B. and C. were at a bank together, depositing part of the pro- ceeds for which C. had sold the gold rings:
Held, that there was evidence to support a conviction of both B. and C. for knowingly concealing treasure trove from the Crown. Reg. v. Thomas and Willett, 376.
L., a member of a trade society, was told by members to leave off working for K., his master, he refused; O'Neill, the president of the society, said that he, as president, ordered him to come out, and then abused L., and said, if he had been working at K.'s he would have pulled him out, and that he would use his influence to have him turned out of the society. Galbraith and others went to K.'s as a deputation, to point out to K. what they objected to. After this, L. was summoned by the society, O'Neill being in the chair, and the business was, whether L. was going to leave K.'s or to be turned out of the society. Galbraith re- ported to the meeting the result of the de- putation to K.'s. L. was then asked by O'Neill whether he would leave K.'s or stay there and be despised by the society, and have his name sent round all over the conntry in the report, and be put to all sorts of unpleasantness:
Held, that this was evidence of a threat by O'Neill under 6 Geo. 4, c. 129, s. 3, and an endeavour to force L. to depart from his employment. O'Neill and Galbraith (apps.) v. Longman (resp.), 360. Attempting to force journeymen to leave their employ, 262, 366.
Fraudulent-Express trust in writing-Savings bank, 189.
TURNPIKE TICKET.
Under the 24 & 25 Vict. c. 96, s. 45, which relates to demanding property, &c., with menaces or by force, the menaces must be of such a nature and extent us to unsettle the mind of the person on whom it operates, and take away from his acts that element of Forgery of, 160. free voluntary action which alone constitutes consent. It is a question for the jury whether the evidence in any particular case
comes within that principle. Reg. v. George Act for taking votes at, App. viii. Walton and Joseph Ogden, 268.
In an indictment for concealing the finding of treasure trove from the Crown, it is not
necessary to aver that the prisoner concealed Act to regulate, App. ix.
it fraudulently. The words "unlawfully, wilfully and knowingly," are sufficient.
A., in ploughing, found large rings of old gold of considerable value and sold them for brass to B. for 5s. 6d., saying where he found them. B. afterwards found out that they were gold and offered them to a jeweller for sale as gold. Then B. said he had sold them
An information under the 5 Geo. 4, c. 83, s. 4 (the Vagrant Act), charged the appellants with being found in the respondent's house at night "for an unlawful purpose, to wit, for the purpose of feloniously stealing the respondent's property." The evidence
showed that they were in the respondent's house, partaking with his servants of his In false pretences, 94. provisions without his knowledge or consent. The justices found that the appellants were in the house for the unlawful purpose of joining in the taking and consuming the respondent's property without his consent or knowledge, and convicted them:
Held, that, as the information laid a felonious purpose, it was essential to support it, that a felonious intention should be shown; that as the justices had merely found that the appellants were in the house for the purpose of unlawfully taking and consuming the respondent's property, without stating that they were there to commit a felony, the conviction was bad. Kerkin and others v. Jenkins, 311.
Of common assault in an indictment for grievous bodily harm, 91.
Right of judge to direct a jury to reconsider,
VEXATIOUS INDICTMENTS ACT. Indictment preferred without leave-Quashing objectionable part-Inadmissibility of evi- dence thereon, 430.
Quashing indictment-Court martial, 433. Averment of performance of conditions of— Recognizance, 483.
FORM OF INDICTMENT. Indictment, under the Foreign Enlistment Act, charging a subject of the Queen with attempting to enlist in the service of a foreign power other British subjects, without having obtained the leave or licence of the Queen, lviii.
An Act to amend the Law relating to the un- lawful administering of Poison, i.
An Act to amend the Act for regulating the Queen's Prison, ii.
An Act to make better Provision for the
Custody and Care of Criminal Lunatics, iii. An Act to extend the Jurisdiction and im- prove the Practice of the High Court of Admiralty, vii.
An Act to provide that Votes at Elections for the Universities may be recorded by means of Voting Papers, viii.
An Act to facilitate Proceedings before Justices under the Acts relating to Vacci- nation, ix.
An Act to give relief to Persons who may refuse or be unwilling, from alleged consci- entious Motives, to be sworn in Criminal Proceedings, ix.
An Act to amend the Laws relating to the Inland Revenue, x.
An Act for regulating the Business of Dealers in old Metals, xi.
An Act to amend the Law relating to Bank- ruptcy and Insolvency in England, xiii. An Act to amend the Law relating to the giving of Aid to Discharged Prisoners, xviii.
An Act for the more speedy Trial of certain Homicides committed by persons subject to the Mutiny Act, xxix.
An Act for obtaining a Declaration of Title, xxxii.
An Act to amend the Law relating to the Fraudulent marking of Merchandise, xxxvii. An Act for the Incorporation, Regulation, and Winding-up of Trading Companies and other Associations, xlvi.
An Act to amend the Law relating to Paro- chial Assessments in England, xlvii.
An Act to give greater Facilities for summon- ing Persons to serve on Juries, and for other Purposes relating thereto, xlvii.
An Act to amend the Law relating to Marriages in Ireland, liii.
An Act to amend and continue the Law re- lating to Corrupt Practices at Elections of Members of Parliament, liii.
An Act for the further Security of the Persons
of Her Majesty's Subjects from personal Violence, lv.
An Act for the Amendment of the Law relat- ing to the Religious Instruction of Prisoners in County and Borough Prisons in England and Scotland, Ivi.
« ForrigeFortsett » |