Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

and the consent of the legal professors was interwoven into the practice of the tribunals. But these interpreters could neither enact nor execute the laws of the republic; and the judges might disregard the authority of the Scævolas them. selves, which was often overthrown by the violence or sophistry of an ingenious pleader. Augustus and Tiberius were the first to adopt, as a useful engine, the science of the civilians; and their servile labors accommodated the old system to the spirit and views of despotism. Under the fair pretence of securing the dignity of the art, the privilege of subscribing legal and valid opinions was confined to the sages of senatorian or equestrian rank, who had been pre viously approved by the judgment of the prince; and this monopoly prevailed, till Adrian restored the freedom of the profession to every citizen conscious of his abilities and knowledge. The discretion of the prætor was now governed by the lessons of his teachers; the judges were enjoined to obey the comment as well as the text of the law; and the use of codicils was a memorable innovation, which Augustus ratified by the advice of the civilians.61 *

Read Cicero, 1. i. de Oratore, Topica, pro Murena.

61 See Pomponius (de Origine Juris Pandect. I. _tit. ii. leg 2. No. 47), Heineccius (ad Institut. 1. i tit. i. No. 8, 1. ut. xxv. in Element. et Antiquitat.), and Gravina (pp. 41-45). Yet the monopoly of Augustus, a harsh measure, would appear with some softening in contemporary evidence, and it was probably veiled by a decree of the senate.

The author here follows the then generally received opinion of Hemeccius. The proofs which appear to confirm it are !. 2. § 47, D. 1. 2, and § 8. Instit I. 2. The first of these passages speaks expressly of a privilege granted to certain law. yers, until the time of Adrian, publice respondendi jus ante Augusti tempora non dabatur. Primus Divus Augustus, ut major juris auctoritas haberetur, con. stituit, ut ex auctoritate ejus responderent. The passage of the Institutes speaks of the different opinions of those. quibus est permissum jura condere. It is true that the first of these passages does not say that the opinion of these privileged lawyers had the force of a law for the judges. For this reason M. Hugo altogether rejects the opinion adopted by Heineccius, by Bach, and in general by all the writers who preceded him. He conceives that the § 8 of the Institutes referred to the constitution of Valentinian III, which regulated the respective authority to be ascribed to the different writings of the great civilians. But we have now the following passage in the Institutes of Gaius Responsa prudentum sunt sententiæ et opiniones eorum, quibus permissum est jura condere; quorum omnium si in unum sententiæ concurrunt, id quod ita sentiunt, legis vicem obtinet, si vero dissentiunt, judici licet, quam velit sententiam sequi, idque rescripto Divi Hadrian significatur. I do not know how. in opposition to this pas sage, the opinion of M. Hugo can be maintained. We must add to this the pas sage quoted from Pomponius; and from such strong proofs, it seems incontestable that the emperors had granted some kind of privilege to certain civilians, quibus permissum erat jura condere. Their opinion had sometimes the force of la, legis vicem. M. Hugo, endeavoring to reconcile this phrase with his Bystem, gives it a forced interpretation, which quite alters the sense; he supposes that the passage contains no more than what is evident of itself, that the authority of the civilians was to be respected, thus making a privilege of that which was free to all the world. It appears to me almost indisputable, that the emperors bad sanctioned certain provisions relative to the authority of these civilians, consulted by the judges But how far was their advice to be respected?

[ocr errors]

The most absolute mandate could only require that the judges should agree with the civilians, if the civilians agreed among themselves. But positive institutions are often the result of custom and prejudice; laws and language are ambiguous and arbitrary; where reason is incapable of pronouncing, the love of argument is inflamed by the envy of rivals, the vanity of masters, the blind attachment of their disciples; and the Roman jurisprudence was divided by the ence famous sects of the Proculians and Sabinians.2 Two sages of the law, Ateius Capito and Antistius Labeo, adorned the peace of the Augustan age; the former distinguished by the favor of his sovereign; the latter more illustrious by his contempt of that favor, and his stern though harmless opposition to the tyrant of Rome. Their legal studies were influenced by the varicus colors of their temper and principles. Labeo was attached to the form of the old republic; his rival embraced the more profitable substance of the rising monarchy. But the disposition of a courtier is tame and submissive; and Capito seldom presumed to deviate from the sentiments, or at least from the words, of his predecessors; while the bold republican pursued his independent ideas without fear of paradox or inno vations. The freedom of Labeo was enslaved, however, by the rigor of his own conclusions, and he decided, according to the letter of the law, the same questions which his indulgent competitor resolved with a latitude of equity more suitable to the common sense and feelings of mankind. If a fair exchange had been substituted to the payment of money, Capito still considered the transaction as a legal sale; and he consulted nature for the age of puberty, with

64

62 I have perused the Diatribe of Gotfridus Mascovius, the learned Mascou, de Sectis Jurisconsultorum (Lipsiæ, 1728, in 12 mo., p. 276), a learned treatise on a narrow and barren ground.

63 See the character of Autistius Labeo in Tacitus (Annal. iii. 75), and in an epistle of Ateius Capito (Aul Gellius xi 12), who accuses his rival of libertas nimia et recors Yet Horace would not have lashed a virtuous and respectable senator. and i must adopt the emendation of Bentley, who reads Labieno insanior (Serm I. iii 82) See Mascou, de Sectis (c. i. pp. Ï-24).

4 Justinian (Institut. I. ii. tit. 23. and Theophil. Vers Græc. pp. 677, C80) has

This is a question which it is impossible to answer precisely. from the want of historic evidence

Is it not possible that the emperors established an authority to be consulted by the judges and in this case this authority must have emanated from certain civilians named for this purpose by the emperors See Hugo. Moreover, may not the passage of Suetonius, m the Life of Caligula, where he says that the emperor would no longer permit the civilians to give their advice, mean that Caligula entertained the design of suppressing this institution? See on this passage the Themis, vol. xi. pp. 17, 36. Our author, not being acquainted with the opinions opposed to Heineccius, has not gone to the bottom of the subject. -W.

66

G8

out confining his definition to the precise period of twelve or fourteen years.65 This opposition of sentiments was propagated in the writings and lessons of the two founders; the schools of Capito and Labeo maintained their inveterate conflict from the age of Augustus to that of Adrian; 6 and the two sects derived their appellations from Sabinus and Proculus, their most celebrated teachers. The names of Cassians and Pegasians were likewise applied to the same parties; but, by a strange reverse, the popular cause was in the hands of Pegasus," a timid slave of Domitian, while the favorite of the Cæsars was represented by Cassius, who gloried in his descent from the patriot assassin. By the perpetual edict, the controversies of the sects were in a great measure determined. For that important work, the emperor Adrian preferred the chief of the Sabinians; the friends of monarchy prevailed; but the moderation of Salvius Julian insensibly reconciled the victors and the vanquished. Like the contemporary philosophers, the lawyers of the age of the Antonines disclaimed the authority of a master, and adopted from every system the most probable doctrines. But their writings would have been less voluminous, had their choice been more unanimous. The conscience of the judge was perplexed by the number and weight of discordant testimonies, and every sentence that his passion or interest might pronounce was justified by the sanction of

commemorated this weighty dispute, and the verses of Homer that were alleged on either side as legal authorities. It was decided by Paul (leg. 33, ad Edict. in Pandect. 1. xviii. tit. i. leg. 1), since, in a simple exchange, the buyer could not be discriminated from the seller.

65 This controversy was likewise given for the Proculians, to supersede the indecency of a search, and to comply with the aphorism of Hippocrates, who was attached to the septenary number of two weeks of years, or 700 of days (Institut. 1. i. tit. xxii.). Plutarch and the Stoics (de Placit. Philosoph. 1. v. c. 24) assign a more natural reason. Fourteen years is the ageπερὶ ἦν ο σπερματικός KOLVETAL оpoos. See the vestigia of the sects in Mascou, c. ix. pp. 145-276.

GC The series and conclusion of the sects are described by Mascou (c. ii.-vii. pp. 24-120), and it would be almost ridiculous to praise his equal justice to these obsolete sects.*

67 At the first summons he flies to the turbot-council; yet Juvenal (Satir. iv. 75-81) styles the præfect or bailiff of Rome sanctissimus legum interpres. From his science, says the old scholiast, he was called, not a man, but a book, He derived the singular name of Pegasus from the galley which his father commauded.

Tacit. Annal. xvii. 7. Sueton. in Nerone, c. xxxvii.

69 Mascou, de Sectis, c. viii. pp. 120-144 de Herciscundis, a legal term which was applied to these eclectic lawyers: herciscere is synonymous to dividere.†

The work of Gaius, subsequent to the time of Adrian, furnishes us with some information on this subject. The disputes which rose between these two sects appear to have been very numerous Gaius avows himself a disciple of Sabinus and of Caius. Compare Hugo, vol. 1. p. 106.-W.

This word has never existed. Cujacius is the author of it, who read the words terris condi in Servius ad Virg. herciscundi, to which he gave an erroneous interpretation.-W.

some venerable name. An indulgent edict of the younger Theodosius excused him from the labor of comparing and weighing their arguments. Five civilians, Caius, Papinian, Paul, Ulpian, and Modestinus, were established as the ora cles of jurisprudence; a majority was decisive; but if their opinions were equally divided, a casting vote was ascribed to the superior wisdom of Papinian.70

When Justinian ascended the throne, the reformation of the Roman jurisprudence was an arduous but indispensable task. In the space of ten centuries, the infinite variety of laws and legal opinions had filled many thousand volumes, which no fortune could purchase and no capacity could digest. Books could not easily be found; and the judges,

70 See the Theodosian Code, 1. i. tit. iv. with Godefroy's Commentary, tom..i. pp. 30-35. This decree might give occasion to Jesuitical disputes like those in the Lettres Provinciales, whether a Judge was obliged to follow the opinion of Papinian, or of a majority, against his judgment, against his eonscience, &c. Yet a legislator might give that opinion, however false, the validity, not of truth, but of law.t

*We possess (since 1824) some interesting information as to the framing of the Theodosian Code, and its ratification at Rome, in the year 438. M. Closius, now professor at Dorpat in Russia, and M. Peyron, member of the Academy of Turin, have discovered, the one at Milan, the other at Turin, a great part of the five first books of the Code, which were wanting, and besides this, the reports (gesta) of the sitting of the senate at Rome, in which the Code was published, in the year after the marriage of Valentinian III. Among these pieces are the constitutions which nominate commissioners for the formation of the Code; and though there are many points of considerable obscurity in these documents, they communicate many facts relative to this legislation.

1. That Theodosius designed a great reform in the legislation; to add to the Gregorian and Hermogenian codes all the new constitutions from Constantine to his own day; and to frame a second code for common use, with extracts from the three codes, and from the works of the civil lawyers. All laws either abrogated or fallen into disuse were to be noted under their proper heads.

2. An ordinance was issued in 429 to form a commission for this purpose, of nine persons, of which Antiochus, as quæstor and præfectus, was president. A second commission of sixteen members was issued in 435 under the same president.

3. A code, which we possess under the name of Codex Theodosianus, was finished in 438, published in the East, in an ordinance addressed to the Prætorian præfect, Florentinus, and intended to be published in the West.

4. Before it was published in the West, Valentinian submitted it to the senate. There is a report of the proceedings of the senate which closed with loud acclamations and gratulations.-From Warnkönig, Histoire du Droit Romain, p. 169.--Wenck has published this work, Codicis Theodosiani libri priores. Leip zig, 1825.-M.

Closius of Tubingen communicated to M. Warnkönig the two following con stitutions of the emperor Constantine, which he discovered in the Ambrosian library of Milan:

1. Imper. Constantinus Aug. ad Maximium Præf. Prætorio.

Perpetuas prudentum contentiones eruere cupientes, Ulpiani ac Pauli, in Papinianum notas, qui dum ingenii laudem sectantur, non tam corrigere eum quam depravere maluerunt, aboleri præcepimus. Dat. III. Kalend. Octob. et Const. Cons. et Crispi (321).

Idem Aug, ad Maximium Præf. Præt.

Universa, quæ scriptura Pauli continentur, recepta auctoritate firmanda sunt, et omni veneratione celebranda. Ideoque sententiarum libros plenissima luce et perfectissimâ elocutione et justissimâ juris ratione succinctos in judiciis prolatos valere minimè dubitatur. Dat. V. Kalend. Oct. Trevir. Const. et Max. Coss. (327).-W.

poor in the midst of riches, were reduced to the exercise of their illiterate discretion. The subjects of the Greek provinces were ignorant of the language that disposed of their lives and properties; and the barbarous dialect of the Latins was imperfectly studied in the academies of Berytus and Constantinople. As an Illyrian soldier, that idiom was familiar to the infancy of Justinian; his youth had been instructed by the lessons of jurisprudence, and his Imperial choice selected the most learned civilians of the East, to labor with their sovereign in the work of reformation."1 The theory of professors was assisted by the practice of advocates, and the experience of magistrates; and the whole undertaking was animated by the spirit of Tribonian.72 This extraordinary man, the object of so much praise and censure, was a native of Side in Pamphylia; and his genius, like that of Bacon, embraced, as his own, all the business and knowledge of the age. Tribonian composed, both in prose and verse, on a strange diversity of curious and abstruse subjects; a double panegyric of Justinian and the life of the philosopher Theodotus; the nature of happiness and the duties of government; Homer's catalogue and the four-and-twenty sorts of metre; the astronomical canon of Ptolemy; the changes of the months; the houses of the planets; and the harmonic system of the world. To the literature of Greece he added the use of the Latin tongue; the Roman civilians were deposited in his library and in his mind; and he most assiduously cultivated those arts which opened the road of wealth and preferment. From the bar of the Prætorian præfects, he raised himself to the honors of quæstor, of consul, and of master of the offices: the council of Justinian listened to his eloquence and wisdom; and envy was mitigated by the gentleness and affability of his

73

71 For the legal labors of Justinian, I have studied the Preface to the Institutes the 1st, 2d, and 3d Prefaces to the Pandects; the 1st and 2d Preface to the Code; and the Code itself (1. i. tit. xvii. de Veteri Jure enucleando). After these original testimonies, I have consulted, among the moderns, Heineccius (Hist. J. R. No. 383-404), Terasson (Hist. de la Jurisprudence Romaine, pp. 295– 356), Gravina (Opp. pp. 93 190), and Ludewig, in his Life of Justinian (pp. 19-123, 318-321; for the Code and Novels, pp. 209-261; for the Digest or Pandects, pp. 262-317).

72 For the character of Tribonian, see the testimonials of Procopius (Persic. 1. i. c. 23, 24. Anecdot. c. 13, 20) and Suidas (tom. iii. p. 501, edit. Kuster). Ludewig (in Vit. Justinian, pp. 175-209) works hard, very hard, to whitewash-the blackamoor.

73 I apply the two passages of Suidas to the same man; every circumstance so exactly tallies. Yet the lawyers appear ignorant; and Fabricius is inclined to separate the two characters (Bibliot. Græc. tom. i. p. 341, ii. p. 518, iii. p. 418, xii. pp. 346, 353, 474.)

« ForrigeFortsett »