...possible future action.) United States ». Nelson, 52 Fed. 646, 647 (1892). ("Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber,...not objectionable to the statute, in my opinion.") See also Queen Ins. Co. r. State of Texas, 86 Tex. 250, 24 SW 397 (1893). (Combination of fifty-seven...

...injuriously affect the public. Unless the agreement involves the absorption of the entire traffic in timber, and is entered into for the purpose of obtaining the entire control of it for extortionate objects, it is not objectionable to the statute, in my opinion. Competition is not...

...An indictment is brought against defendants charging these facts. Opinion. ' ' Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber,...extortion, it is not objectionable to the statute." A demurrer to the indictment is sustained. Blindell et al. v. Hagan et a1. 64 Fed., 40. Circuit Court,...

...Missouri. An indictment is brought against defendants charging these facts. Opinion. "Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber,...extortion, it is not objectionable to the statute." A demurrer to the indictment is sustained. Blindell et al. v. Hagan et al. 54 Fed., 40. Circuit Court,...

...Missouri. An indictment is brought against defendants charging these facts. Opinion. "Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber, and is entered into for the purpose of obtain1 Several other members of the distilling company were arrested under indictments substantially...

...Missouri. An indictment is brought against defendants charging these facts. Opinion. "Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber, and is entered into for the purpose of obtain1 Several other members of the distilling company were arrested under indictments substantially...

...involves an absorption of the entire traffic, ... it is not objectionable to the statute (of 1890). Competition is not stifled by such an agreement, and other dealers would soon force the parties to an agreement to sell at the market price, or a reasonable price, at least.' United States v. Nelson...

...It was held that, "Unie s<? the agreement involves the absorption of the entire traffic in lumbe^, and is entered into for the purpose of obtaining the...extortion, it is not objectionable to the statute." It is plain that this renders the law of no effect as it is practically impossible for the most powerful...

...as a restrain! upon trade, nor does it tend to injuriously affect the public. Unless the atrreeiuent involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber,...to the statute, in my opinion. Competition is not stilled by such an agreement, and other dealers would soon force the parties to the agreement to sell...

...intended to be done by combination, and that they are in restraint of trade. "Unless the agreement involves an absorption of the entire traffic in lumber,...is not objectionable to the statute in my opinion." United States v. Nelson, 52 Fed. Rep. 646, 647. Do not the allegations in the present case show a purpose...