Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
able according adopted agreement Amendment American Anti-monopoly Anti-Trust authorized body Boston capital capital stock Chief citi citizens citizenship coal Colorado combination commerce commission common law competition Congress Constitution copper created decision delivering demand dependent enact evil exercise exist families Federal Government foreign gives Harvester hold impossible incorporated individual industrial interests International Jersey Justice labor land legislation legislature limit lowing manufacturing meaning ment Mexico Michigan million mines monopolistic corporations natural necessary nopoly normal operated opinion organization paid party passed persons President prevent private monopoly privileges profits protect provision public policy railroads Read reasonable regulate Reporter restraint of trade result rule Sherman single sovereign statute strike suppress Supreme Court tion Tobacco trust Union United York
Side 3 - Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any such contract or engage in any such combination or conspiracy, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor...
Side 4 - We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public.
Side 4 - Applying the rule of reason to the construction of the statute, it was held in the Standard Oil Case that as the words "restraint of trade" at common law and in the law of this country at the time of the adoption of the Anti-trust Act only embraced acts or contracts or agreements or combinations which operated to the prejudice of the public interests by unduly restricting competition or unduly obstructing the due course of trade or which, either because of their inherent nature or effect or because...
Side 19 - The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.
Side 8 - By the gradual absorption of control over all the elements essential to the successful manufacture of tobacco products, and placing such control in the hands of seemingly independent corporations serving as perpetual barriers to the entry of others into the tobacco trade.
Side 15 - The recognition of its existence even by other States, and the enforcement of its contracts made therein, depend purely upon the comity of those States — a comity which is never extended where the existence of the corporation or the exercise of its powers are prejudicial to their interests or repugnant, to their policy.
Side 15 - It is not too much to say that the wealth and business of the country are to a great extent controlled by them. And if, when composed of citizens of one state, their corporate powers and franchises could be exercised in other states without restriction, it is easy to see that, with the advantages thus possessed, the most important business of those states would soon pass into their hands. The principal business of every state would, in fact, be controlled by corporations created by other states.
Side 4 - ... acts or contracts or agreements or combinations which operated to the prejudice of the public interests by unduly restricting competition or unduly obstructing the due course of trade or which, either because of their inherent nature or effect or because of the evident purpose of the acts, etc., injuriously restrained trade, that the words as used in the statute were designed to have and did have but a like significance.
Side 2 - The republican party Is opposed to special privilege and to monopoly. It placed upon the statute book the interstate commerce act of 1887 and the Important amendments thereto, and the antitrust act of 1890, and it has consistently and successfully enforced the provisions of these laws. It will take no backward step to permit the re-establishment In any degree of conditions which were Intolerable.
Side 5 - In this light it is not material that the price of an article may be lowered. It is in the power of the combination to raise it, and the result in any event is unfortunate for the country by depriving it of the services of a large number of small but independent dealers who were familiar with the business and who had spent their lives in it, and who had supported themselves and their families from the small profits realized therein.