Brief Manual: Technical Rules Covering the Preparation of BriefsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1941 - 85 sider |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Brief Manual: Technical Rules Covering the Preparation of Briefs United States. Department of Labor. Office of the Solicitor Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1941 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abbreviated Administrator Aeolus AMICUS CURIAE appendix Ashwander Atlantic Reporter attorney Bank bill blocked quotations Board brackets capitalized center headings certiorari chapter Chief Justice circuit court cited City comma Commerce Commission Commissioner Committee Cong Congress Congressional Corporation Court briefs court of appeals Decisions Department of Labor DISTRICT COURT District of Columbia document draft ellipsis employees F.Supp Fair Labor Standards fdgs February 26 Federal Reporter footnotes FRANCES PERKINS given Government Governor Hour Division House index of citations indicated italicized italics June 25 Labor Standards Act letter listed margin matter Miscellaneous National official reporter paragraph Pennsylvania Railroad placed preceding proofreading proper name punctuation quotation marks Railroad Riggs Bank Run-in headings Secretary Senate sentence sess Solicitor spelled Stat stenographer supervisor's copy supra Supreme Court tion U.S. Reports United States Code United States Congress United States Department Wage and Hour Washington
Populære avsnitt
Side 23 - Produced" means produced, manufactured, mined, handled, or in any other manner worked on in any State; and for the purposes of this chapter an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed in producing, manufacturing, mining, handling, transporting, or in any other manner working on such goods, or in any process or occupation necessary to the production thereof, in any State.
Side 24 - Interference with the power of the States was no constitutional criterion of the power of Congress. If the power was not given. Congress could not exercise it; if given, they might exercise it, although it should interfere with the laws, or even the Constitution of the States.
Side 26 - But where the regulation is within the scope of authority legally delegated, the presumption of the existence of facts justifying its specific exercise attaches alike to statutes, to municipal ordinances, and to orders of administrative bodies.
Side 35 - In the first place, the main purpose of such constitutional provisions is "to prevent all such previous restraints upon publications as had been practiced by other governments," and they do not prevent the subsequent punishment of such as may be deemed contrary to the public welfare.
Side 24 - ... in any State for sale, trade, transportation, transmission, shipment, or delivery, to any place outside thereof. Goods are produced for commerce where the producer intends, hopes, expects, or has reason to believe that the goods or any unsegregated part of them will move (in the same or in an altered form or as a part or ingredient of other goods) in interstate or foreign commerce.
Side 18 - There are, however, decisions to the effect that propositions asDictum is defined as "an opinion expressed by a court, but which, not being necessarily involved in the case, lacks the force of an adjudication...
Side 27 - ... the character assailed were made after August, 1917. But respondent was required to find from all the evidence before it what was the real nature of petitioner's attitude. It was permissible for respondent to take judicial notice of the government's war-time control of sugar sales and consumption. It was also proper to note that petitioner was contending (and still contends) that the act is void for indefiniteness, that the act is unconstitutional, and that the act, even if valid, under any proper...
Side 27 - I. Petitioner insists that the injunctional order was improvidently issued because, before the complaint was filed and the hearing had, petitioner had discontinued the methods in question and, as stated in its answer, had no intention of resuming them. For example, no sugar offers of the character assailed were made after August 1917. But respondent was required to find from all the evidence before it what was the real nature of petitioner's attitude. It was permissible for respondent to take judicial...
Side 26 - ... to appear that under the Employees' Compensation Act he had authority so to do. The court furthermore observed that the bill of complaint contained no allegation that the deputy commissioner had made any claim that his opinion was being disregarded by any of the complainants, or that the latter had ever been in violation of the law as set forth in the opinion. The court further concluded that since all that the deputy commissioner had done, as alleged, was to render the opinion set forth in the...
Side 60 - Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. Little Rock Packing Company, a corporation, Defendant", said cause being Civil Action No.