 That there might be no misunderstanding of the universality of this principle, it was expressly enacted, in 1867, that "no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.  The Insurance Law Journal - Side 9051876Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | United States. Department of the Treasury - 1875 - 926 sider
...power more arbitrary in respect to rights of property can be conceived, since it is expressly provided that no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court. Is it asked, How, then, are the rights of the citizen protected against... | |
 | United States. President - 1875 - 934 sider
...power more arbitrary in respect to rights of property can be conceived, since it is expressly provided that no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in nny court. Is it asked, How, then, aro the rights of the citi/en protected against... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - 1876 - 982 sider
...миге arbitrary in respect to rights of property can be conceived, since it is expressly provided that no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court. Is :t asked, How, then, are the rights of the citizen protected against... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1879 - 644 sider
...by the laws of the United States. The Revised Statutes of the United States, (see. 3224,) provide, that "no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any Court." Taken literally, this would prohibit Mich a proceeding as the one under... | |
 | 1921 - 2116 sider
...to the prohibition contained in section 3224 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 5947), providing that: "No suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court." It is alleged in plaintiff's amended complaint that the appellant is a... | |
 | California. Office of the Attorney General - 1882 - 98 sider
...enactment of a law similar to Section 3224 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, which provides that " no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any Court ;" and also, providing that before the validity of a tax can be in anywise... | |
 | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1883 - 654 sider
...constituent into the valuation. Id. 6. Section 3224 of the Revised Statutes of the United States declaring that .• no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court," iipplies only to taxes levied by the United States, and has no application... | |
 | California. Legislature - 1883 - 1001 sider
...enactment of a law similar to Section 3224 of the Eevised Statutes of the United States, which provides that " no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any Court ;" and also, providing that before the validity of a tax can be in anywise... | |
 | Charles Fisk Beach (Jr.) - 1893 - 942 sider
...is no place in this system for an application to a court of justice until after the money is paid. That there might be no misunderstanding of the universality...restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.' * And although this was intended to apply alone to taxes levied by the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1895 - 760 sider
...money, he must do it." 92 US 85, 89. Again, in Railroad Tax Cases, 92 US 575, 613, the court said: "That there might be no misunderstanding of the universality...restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.' Rev. Stat. sect. 3224. And though this was intended to apply alone to... | |
| |
