Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
accident agree appeal argument asked become Bench called cause charge citizen claims client committed confidence convicted cost counsel Court crime criminal dealing decide decision defendant delay difficult direct effect employer England error evidence examination expense facts feel give given hands hearing important increased indictment influence injury interest issues judge judgment jury justice labor lawyer least legislation legislature less limit litigation Massachusetts matter means methods murder necessary needs never officers once opinion paid parties passed perhaps person possible practice present President profession proper protect questions reach reason recent remedy respect result rule secure settled statute suggested suit Supreme Court taken testimony thing tion trial tribunal tried trust United verdict whole witness York
Side 163 - It is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual, his life, liberty, property, and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as free, impartial, and independent as the lot of humanity will admit.
Side 155 - The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse ; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment ; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.
Side 235 - Of law there can be no less acknowledged, than that her seat is the bosom of God, her voice the harmony of the world ; all things in heaven and earth do her homage, the very least as feeling her care, and the greatest as not exempted from her power...
Side 1 - Let reverence for the laws be breathed by every American mother to the lisping babe that prattles on her lap; let it be taught in schools, in seminaries, and in colleges; let it be written in primers, spelling books, and in almanacs; let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls, and enforced in courts of justice. And, in short, let it become the political religion of the Nation...
Side 27 - ... an advocate, by the sacred duty which he owes his client, knows in the discharge of that office but one person in the world, that client and none other. To save that client by all expedient means, to protect that client at all hazards and costs, to all others, and among others to himself, is the highest and most unquestioned of his duties; and he must not regard the alarm, the suffering, the torment, the destruction which he may bring upon any other.
Side 154 - Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.
Side 140 - The Court or a Judge may, at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party...
Side 232 - In the government of this commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them : the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them : to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men.
Side 111 - The judge is primarily responsible for the just outcome of the trial. He is not a mere moderator of a town meeting, submitting questions to the jury for determination, nor simply ruling on the admissibility of testimony, but one who in our jurisprudence stands charged with full responsibility.
Side 35 - Solicitor, any costs properly incurred have nevertheless proved fruitless to the person incurring the same, the Court or Judge] may call on the Solicitor of the person by whom such costs have been so incurred to show cause why such costs should not be disallowed as between the Solicitor and his client, and also (if the circumstances of the case shall require) why the Solicitor should not repay to his client any costs which the client may have been ordered to pay to any other person, and thereupon...