United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side lvi
... Department of Veterans Affairs Demeree v . United States Demeter v . Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections Demirzhiu v . Ashcroft Demis ; Anderson v . Demissie v . Gonzales Demjanjuk v . United States Democratic National Comm . v ...
... Department of Veterans Affairs Demeree v . United States Demeter v . Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections Demirzhiu v . Ashcroft Demis ; Anderson v . Demissie v . Gonzales Demjanjuk v . United States Democratic National Comm . v ...
Side cxxxiii
... Dept. of Corrections 991 Murphy v . Norris 907 Murphy ; Steele v . 893 Murphy v . United States 973,1085 Murray , In re 1048 Murray v . Crosby 836 Murray v . Lynch 838,1016 Murray v . Mansura 961,1084 Murray v . Perlow 990,1179 Murray v ...
... Dept. of Corrections 991 Murphy v . Norris 907 Murphy ; Steele v . 893 Murphy v . United States 973,1085 Murray , In re 1048 Murray v . Crosby 836 Murray v . Lynch 838,1016 Murray v . Mansura 961,1084 Murray v . Perlow 990,1179 Murray v ...
Side 499
... Department of Corrections ' ( CDC ) unwritten policy of racially segregating prisoners in double cells for up to 60 days each time they enter a new correctional facility is based on the asserted rationale that it prevents violence ...
... Department of Corrections ' ( CDC ) unwritten policy of racially segregating prisoners in double cells for up to 60 days each time they enter a new correctional facility is based on the asserted rationale that it prevents violence ...
Side 517
... Department of Corrections ( CDC ) has had an ample opportunity to justify its policy during the course of this litigation , but has utterly failed to do so whether judged under strict scrutiny or the more deferential standard set out in ...
... Department of Corrections ( CDC ) has had an ample opportunity to justify its policy during the course of this litigation , but has utterly failed to do so whether judged under strict scrutiny or the more deferential standard set out in ...
Side 654
... CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ; No. 03M86 . MARTINEZ v . BREAUX ET AL .; No. 03M88 . VLASEK v ... DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE , CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION ; No ... CORRECTIONS ; and No. 04M11 . MITCHELL v . PER - SE TECHNOLOGIES , INC ...
... CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ; No. 03M86 . MARTINEZ v . BREAUX ET AL .; No. 03M88 . VLASEK v ... DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE , CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION ; No ... CORRECTIONS ; and No. 04M11 . MITCHELL v . PER - SE TECHNOLOGIES , INC ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir acceptance action alien allow Amendment applied Appx argued argument Ashcroft Attorney authority Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital cause Certiorari denied Circuit circumstances claim clause conduct Congress consider constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL Court of Appeals crime criminal curiae damages death penalty decision defendant DEPARTMENT Dept determination DIRECTOR dissenting Dist District Court Dretke ET AL evidence fact federal filed finding Florida Government granted Guidelines held holding imposed inmates interest issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury JUSTICE Kansas limitation meaning ment Michigan October offense officer opinion parties person petitioner presented prison provision punishment question reason removal Reported requirement respondent rule Secretary sentencing Services Smith Special standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS subparagraph supra Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial United violation WARDEN