United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 543United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2004 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 37
... jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . Pursuant to this instruction , the jury sentenced ...
... jury to give effect to his mitigation evidence only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . Pursuant to this instruction , the jury sentenced ...
Side 38
... jury to give effect to mitigation evidence , but allowed the jury to do so only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . In Penry v . Johnson ...
... jury to give effect to mitigation evidence , but allowed the jury to do so only by negating what would otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness . In Penry v . Johnson ...
Side 39
... jury was instructed on two special issues : first , whether the killing was deliberate ; and second , whether the defendant posed a continuing danger to others . Approximately two years prior to the trial , we had held that presenting ...
... jury was instructed on two special issues : first , whether the killing was deliberate ; and second , whether the defendant posed a continuing danger to others . Approximately two years prior to the trial , we had held that presenting ...
Side 41
... jury considered a variety of mitigation evidence . Petitioner presented evidence that ( 1 ) he had been diagnosed with potentially organic learning disabilities and speech handicaps at an early age ; ( 2 ) he had a verbal IQ score of 75 ...
... jury considered a variety of mitigation evidence . Petitioner presented evidence that ( 1 ) he had been diagnosed with potentially organic learning disabilities and speech handicaps at an early age ; ( 2 ) he had a verbal IQ score of 75 ...
Side 42
... jury verdict form tracked the final reminders the prosecution gave the jury . The form made no mention of nullification . Nor did it say anything about mitigation evidence . Instead , the verdict form asked whether petitioner committed ...
... jury verdict form tracked the final reminders the prosecution gave the jury . The form made no mention of nullification . Nor did it say anything about mitigation evidence . Instead , the verdict form asked whether petitioner committed ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
11th Cir acceptance action alien allow Amendment applied Appx argued argument Ashcroft Attorney authority Brief C. A. 3d Cir C. A. 9th Cir California capital cause Certiorari denied Circuit circumstances claim clause conduct Congress consider constitutional contract Corp CORRECTIONAL Court of Appeals crime criminal curiae damages death penalty decision defendant DEPARTMENT Dept determination DIRECTOR dissenting Dist District Court Dretke ET AL evidence fact federal filed finding Florida Government granted Guidelines held holding imposed inmates interest issue Johnson Jones judge judgment jury JUSTICE Kansas limitation meaning ment Michigan October offense officer opinion parties person petitioner presented prison provision punishment question reason removal Reported requirement respondent rule Secretary sentencing Services Smith Special standard Stat statute statutory STEVENS subparagraph supra Texas THOMAS tion tiorari denied trial United violation WARDEN