...validity, or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the united states, and the decision is ngair.st the title, right, privilege' or exemption specially setup or claimed by either party, under...

...circuit, wherein the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, shall exceed the value of one hundred dollars, may be re-examined, and reversed or affirmed, in the Supreme Court of the United States by writ of error or appeal, which shall be prosecuted in the same manner under the same regulations,...

...States, or of a commission held under them, is, in any suit in such court, drawn in question ; and a decision is against the title, right, privilege, or exemption, specially set up i Laws. US }. con. 1. sess. c. 20. s. 22. m See the case of Wiscart ct al. ~u. Dauchy, (3. Dall. 321.-...

...)ial>le for that variance. t^iicrc, if the mistake lie of a matter •Itemed perfectly immaheld under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption, spe. cially set up or claimed by eithe'r party, under such clause of the said constitution, treaty,...

...validity; or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the...said constitution, treaty, statute, or commission, the final judgment or decree in any suit in the highest court of law or equity of a state, may be reexamined...

...validity, &c. or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission *held under, the United States, and the decision is * 270 against the title, right, privilege or exemption, specially set up or claimed by either party...

...clause of a treaty, and the decision is against the right claimed under such clause of the treaty, may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the supreme court of the United States." •Harper, for the plaintiff in error. The question in this case is, whether Scarth's interest,...

...or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity, &?c. may be reexamined and reversed or affirmed in the supreme court ' of the United States upon a writ of error." Thus, as early as the year 1789, among the first acts of the government,...

...the United States, and the decision is in favour of such their validity ; or the construction of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under, the...specially set up or claimed, by either party, under «uch clause of the constitution, treaty, statute or commission. Such judgment or decree may be reexamined...

...States, and the decision is in favour of APRIL, 1814. Hunter v. Martin. APRIL, 1814. Hunter v. Martin. specially set up or claimed by either party under...treaty, statute or commission, may be re-examined or reversed, or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States upon a writ of error, the citation...