PAYMENTS OF TAXES, OR IN LIEU OF TAXES, TO
STATES OR LOCAL TAXING UNITS
The committee met, pursuant to call, at 10: 10 a. m., in room 357, Senate Office Building, Washington, D. C., Senator Hubert H. Humphrey presiding.
Present: Senator Hubert H. Humphrey, Democrat, Minnesota; Senator Samuel J. Ervin, Jr., Democrat, North Carolina; Senator Karl E. Mundt, Republican, South Dakota; Senator Norris Cotton, Republican, New Hampshire; Senator George H. Bender, Republican, Ohio.
Present also: Walter L. Reynolds, chief clerk; Ann M. Grickis, assistant chief clerk; Eli E. Nobleman, professional staff member. Senator HUMPHREY. We will call this hearing to order.
Following the customary procedure, the acting chairman will make a brief statement and then we shall proceed to the testimony of our witnesses. The first witness this morning, following my statement, will be Senator Goldwater. We shall accommodate the Senators who are here in the first part of the meeting.
This hearing has been scheduled this morning at the direction of Senator McClellan, chairman of this committee, to consider the important and troublesome problem of Federal payment of taxes or in lieu of taxes to State and local taxing authorities, and to afford an opportunity to representatives of the National Association of County Officials to present their views on the subject. These representatives have been with us in this area at Richmond, Va., for their meeting and we have made some arrangements to have them here this morning. For a number of years, State and local taxing authorities have been seriously concerned over the increasing acquisition by the Federal Government of various types of property, which has operated to remove such property from local tax rolls. From time to time over the years, the Congress has acknowledged responsibility for reducing, to some extent, the adverse effects of these acquisitions upon local government revenues and fiscal structures by enacting numerous statutory provisions which authorize payments by certain Federal agencies or upon certain types of properties. However, the great majority of Federal agencies have no general authority to make payments on their properties. Furthermore, existing provisions of law are quite diverse and result in different treatment for similar properties of various agencies. Thus, those provisions of law which do exist fail to present any clear-cut uniform policy. On some classes of property, some agencies