« ForrigeFortsett »
| Bates. | || McLean.
| Read, Tul Chase.
Fremont. IIII||| Dayton.
II || Sumner.
1 | Collamer.
lature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to Slavery in any Territory of the United States.
9. That we brand the recent re-opening of the African slave-trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age;
Maine.. .10 and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that exe.
New Hampshire 1 7
Vermont. crable traffic.
Massachusetts..21 10. That in the recent vetoes, by their Federal Gover
Rhode Island, nors, of the acts of the Legislatures of Kansas and Ne
Connecticut.... oraska, prohibiting Slavery in those Territories, we find a
New-York......70 practical illustration of the boasted Democratic princi
New-Jersey: ple of Non Intervention and Popular Sovereignty embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska bill, and a demonstration
Pennsylvania.. 13 of the deception and fraud involved therein.
Delaware. 11. That Kansas should, of right, be immediately ad
8 14 mitted as a State under the Constitution recently formed Virginia.... and adopted by her people, and accepted by the House
5 6 2 Kentucky
Ohio.. of Representatives.
26 12. That, while providing revenue for the support of the
18 General Government by duties upon imports, sound policy
12 requires such an adjustment of these imposts as to en
22 courage the development of the industrial interests of the
Texas.. whole country: and we commend that policy of national
Wisconsin. .10 exchanges which secures to the working men liberal
Iowa.. wages, to agriculture remunerating prices, to mechanics
California.. and manufacturers an adequate reward for their
Minnesota..... 8 labor, and enterprise, and to the nation commercial prosperity and independence.
Territories. 13. That we protest against any sale or alienation to
6 others of the Public Lands held by actual settlers, and Nebraska.....
2 1 against any view of the Homestead policy which regards Dis. of Columbia 2 the settlers as paupers or suppliants for public bounty; and we demand the passage by Congress of the complete
Total.... 1734 102 8 503 48 12 1 49 14 1 1 10 and satisfactory Homestead measure which has already passed the House.
Whole number of votes, 465. Necessary to 14. That the Republican Party is opposed to any change a choice, 233. in our Naturalization Laws or any State legislation by The second ballot was then taken. which the rights of citizenship hitherto accorded to immi. grants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired ;
Mr. Cameron's name was withdrawn. and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.
15. That appropriations by Congress for River and Harbor improvements of a National character, required for the accommodation and security of an existing commerce, are authorized by the Constitution, and justified Maine.
10 by the obligations of Government to protect the lives and
New Hampshire property of its citizens. 16. That a Railroad to the Pacific Ocean is imperatively Massachusetts..
22 4 demanded by the interests of the whole country; that
Rhode Island.. the Federal Government ought to render immediate and
Connecticut efficient aid in its construction; and that, as preliminary New-York...
70 thereto, a daily Overland Mail should be promptly New-Jersey. established. 17. Finally, having thus set forth our distinctive prin Maryland..
Pennsylvania. ciples and views, we invite the coöperation of all citi- Delaware..
14 On the following day, Friday, May 18th, the Ohio...
26 Chair having announced that the naming of
Missouri.. candidates for President was in order, Wm. Michigan.
12 M. Evarts, of New-York, named William H. Illinois..
10 Mr. Judd, of Illinois, named Abraham Lin- Iowa..
2 coln. Mr. Dudley, of New-Jersey, nominated California Wm. L. Dayton. Gov. Reeder, of Pennsylva- Oregon...... vania, nominated Simon Cameron. Mr. Cart- Territories ter, of Obio, nominated Salmon P. Chase. Kansas.
3 Francis P. Blair, of Maryland, nominated Ed.
District of Columbia. 2 ward Bates, of Missouri. Indiana seconded the nomination of Abraham
Total.........1844 181 35 2 8 424 10 2 Lincoln. Mr. Austin Blair, of Michigan, seconded The third ballot was taken amid excitement, the nomination of Mr. Seward; so also did Carl and cries for “the ballot.” Intense feeling Schurz, of Wisconsin, Mr. Worth, of Minnesota, existed during the voting, each vote being and Mr. Wilder, of Kansas.
awaited in breathless silence and expectancy. Mr. Corwin, of Ohio, nominated Judge Mc- The progress of the ballot was watched with Lean.
most intense interest, especially toward the Mr. Delano, of Ohio, seconded the nomination last, the crowd becoming silent as the contest of Mr. Lincoln, as did also one of the delegates narrowed down. The States, as called, voted as from Iowa.
follows: The balloting then proceeded, with the followmg result: ཏུ
* Propiously withdrawn.
II || Dayton. III! | C.M. Clay
II | | Bates.
Troll || | C. M. Clay.
Il lowell || Chase.
ii | C. M. Clay.
USCO LAB Lincoln.
1811 | Banks.
| H. W.Davis.
Teil | Hickman.
10 New Hampshire. 1
10 Massachusetts.... 8
Massachusetts.. 20 Connecticut.
Rhode Island.. New-York...
Connecticut... 2 1
2 5 New Jersey...... 5
9 4 2 11 35
6 52 Maryland. 2
Pennsylvania. 4 24 24 7 11 Delaware..
1 8 14
Kentucky. .23 Indiana.
.18 Michigan. 12
Michigan.. Texas.. 6
2 2 Wisconsin... ..10
Texas.. Iowa. 2
5 California 8
Iowa .. Minnesota.
Territories. Nebraska... 8
Kansas. Dist. of Columbia 2
Dist. of Columbia.. 2 180 22 241 2311
Total.. .1014 387 51 58 194 1 8 This gave Lincoln 2311 votes, or within 24 of Total 461. Necessary to a choice, 232. a nomination.
Before the result was announced, Mr. Cartter, of Ohio, said, I rise, Mr. Chairman, to an
Clay. Hickman. nounce the change of four votes from Ohio, Maine.. from Mr. Chase to Abraham Lincoln.
New Hampshire. This announcement, giving Mr. Lincoln a Massachusetts. majority, was greeted by the audience with the Rhode Island most enthusiastic and thundering applause.
New York. Mr. McCrillis, of Maine, making himself heard, New-Jersey, said that the young giant of the West is now of Pennsylvania. age. Maine casts for him her 16 votes.
Maryland.. Mr. Andrew, of Massachusetts, changed the
Virginia.. vote of that State, giving 18 to Mr. Lincoln and Kentucky 8 to Mr. Seward.
14 Mr. B. Gratz Brown, of Missouri, desired to
5 change the 18 votes of Missouri to the gallant son Michigan.
8 of the West, Abraham Lincoln. Iowa, Con- Illinois......
Texas. necticut, Kentucky, and Minnesota also changed
Wisconsin, their votes.
The result of the third ballot was Iowa... announced: Whole number of votes cast
Oregon. Necessary to a choice..... 234
Kansas. Abraham Lincoln had received 354, and was Nebraska. declared duly nominated.
District of Columbia. On motion of Wm. M. Evarts, of New-York,
18 seconded by Mr. Andrew, of Massachusetts, the nomination was then made unanimous.
Massachusetts withdrew the name of Mr. On motion of Mr. Evarts, of New-York, the Banks, and cast 26 votes for Mr. Hamlin. Convention now took a recess till 5 o'clock, to Pennsylvania withdrew the name of Gov. afford time for consultation as to Vice-President. Reeder, and cast 54 votes for Mr. Hamlin.
At 5 o'clock the Convention rëassembled, On motion of Mr. Blakey, of Kentucky, the listened to nominations, and then proceeded to nomination was made ananimous. ballot.
Mr. J. R. Giddings, of Ohio, offered and the The following is a record of the ballotings for Convention adopted the following: Vice-President:
Resolded, That we deeply sympathize with those men
who have been driven, some from their native States and [NOTE.—Col.Fremont had sent a letter by one exiled from their homes on account of their opinions ;
others from the States of their adoption, and are now of the delegates from California, withdrawing and we hold the Democratic party responsible for the his name from the list of candidates for Presi- gross violations of that clause of the Constitution which dent. This letter was published before the declares that citizens of each State shall be entitled to
all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the meeting of the Convention.]
Mr. Ashmun made a brief speech, and the Resolved, That it is both the part of patriotism and Convention adjourned sine die, with nine hearty PAR CONSTITUTION OF THE COUNTRY, THE Usion of TAR
of duty to recognize no political principle other than cheers for the ticket.
STATES AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE Laws, and that, as representatives of the Constitutional Union men of
the country in National Convention assembled, wo NATIONAL REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE. hereby pledge ourselves to maintain, protect and de
fend, separately and unitedly, these great principles of The Convention previous to its adjournment public liberty and national safety, against all enemies made choice of the following gentlemen as the at home and abroad, believing that thereby peace may National Committee for the next four years :
once more be restored to the country, the rights of the
People and of the States reëstablished, and the Govern Maine-CHARLES J. GILMAN, Brunswick.
ment again placed in that condition, of justice, fraternity Nero-Hampshire-GEORGE Ġ. FOGG, Concord.
and equality, which, under the example and Constitution Vermont- LAWRENCE BRAINARD, St. Albans.
of our fathers, has solemly bound every citizen of the Massachusetts—John Z. GOODRICH, Stockbridge.
United States to maintain a more perfect union, estabRhode Island–Thomas G. TURNER, Providence. lish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for Connecticut_GIDEON WELLES, Hartford.
the common defense, promote the general welfare, and Nero-York-EDWIN D. MORGAN, Albany.
secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our Nero-Jersey-DENNING DUER, Ń. Y. City.
A Democratic National Convention assembled Indiana-SOLOMON MEREDITH, Centerville.
at Charleston, S. C., on the 23d of April, 1860, Illinois—NORMAN B. JUDD, Chicago. Michigan-AUSTIN BLAIR,
with full delegations present from every State
kson, Wisconsin—CARL SCHURZ, Milwaukee.
in the Union, and double delegations from Iowa-ANDREW J. STEVENS, Des Moines.
Illinois and New-York. One of the New-York Minnesota John McKUSICK, Stillwater.
delegations was elected by the State Nominating Missouri -ASA S. JONES, St. Louis. Kentucky-CASSIUS M. CLAY, Whitehall.
Convention which met at Syracuse the precedCalifornia-D. W. CHEESMAN, Oroville.
ing autumn; while its rival was elected by Oregon-W. FRANK JOHNSON, Oregon City. Kansas-William A. PHILLIPS, Lawrence.
districts, and led by Fernando Wood, Mayor of Nebraska_0. H. IRISH, Nebraska City.
the commercial emporium. From Illinois, one Dist. of Columbia, JOSEPH GERHARDT, Washington. of the delegations was favorable to Senator
At a meeting held in Chicago, May 18th, Douglas, and the other opposed to that gentle1860, the Committee organized by choosing the man. Tickets of admission were given by the Hon. E. D. Morgan, of New York, Chairman, National Committee to the former or “Šoft” and George G. Fogs, of New Hampshire, Secre- Delegation from New York, thus deciding, so tary. Subsequently, the following persons were far as their power extended, against the Wood constituted the Executive Committee: 7 or “Hard" contestants, who were understood E. D. MORGAN, of New-York.
to be opposed to the nomination of Douglas. GIDEON WELLES, of Connecticut.
Francis B. Flournoy, of Arkansas, was cho-
sen temporary chairman, and the Convention John Z. GOODRICH, of Massachusetts.
opened with an angry and stormy debate on the DENNING DUER, of New-Jersey.
question of the disputed seats. Mr. Fisher, of GEO. G. Fogg, of New-Hampshire.
Va., presented a protest from Mayor Wood,
on behalf of his delegation, against their CONSTITUTIONAL UNION CONVENTION- exclusion from the Hall. The reading of the 1860.
protest was ruled out of order, and, after a
wrangling debate, committees were appointed A Convention of Delegates, coming from on Permanent Organization and Credentials, twenty States, and claiming to represent the and the communication of Mayor Wood was “Constitutional Union Party,” met at Baltimore referred without reading to the latter. on the 9th of May, and nominated for President
On the following day, the Committee on John Bell, of Tennessee, and for Vice-President Organization reported the name of Caleb CushEdward Everett, of Massachusetts. The ballot. ing, of Mass., for President, with one Viceings for President resulted as follows:
President and one Secretary from each State,
1st. 2d. which report was adopted. They also reported John Bell, 68} 138 Edward Everett,.. 25 9 Sam. Houston, ..
a rule “ that in any State in which it has not 57
69 Wm. L. Goggin,... 3 John M. Botts,.... 91 7 Wm. A. Graham,.. 22
“been provided or directed by its State ConJohn McLean,.... 21 Wm. L. Sharkey,.. ? 81“ vention how its vote may be given, the J. J. Crittenden, 1| Wm. C. Rives,
“ Convention will recognize the right of each Necessary to a choice, 1st ballot, 128; second delegate to cast his individual vote.” Which ballot, 127.
was also adopted. The nomination of Mr. Bell was thereupon A Committee on Resolutions and Platform made unanimous.
was now appointed; and it was voted that no Mr. Everett was unanimously nominated for ballot for President and Vice-President should Vice-President.
be taken till after the adoption of a Platform. The Convention adopted the following as Adjourned. their
On the following day, the only progress made
by the Convention was the settlement of the Whereas, Experience has demonstrated that Plat- question of contested seats, by confirming the forms adopted by the partisan Conventions of the sitting delegates; that is, the “Softs” from people, and at the same time to widen the political On the 26th, no progress was made, though country have had the effect to mislead and deceive the New-York, and the Douglas men from Illinois. divisions of the country, by the creation and encouragement of geographical and sectional parties ; therefore, there was much angry debate and many threats
of bolting on the part of delegates from the ment to protect the rights of persons or pro. Cotton States, unless their views in regard to perty on the high seas, in the Territories, or Platform should be adopted.
wherever else its constitutional authority ex. On the 27th, the Platform Committee, failing tends. to agree, presented an assortment of Platforms, The fourth that, when the settlers in a Terri. from which the Convention was expected to tory have adequate population to form a State make its selection. The majority report, pre- Constitution, the right of Sovereignty comsented by Mr. Avery, of N. C., was as fol. mences, and, being consummated by their adlows:
mission into the Union, they stand upon an
other States, Resoloed, That the Platform adopted at Cincinnati be equal footing with the citizens affirmed, with the following resolution:
and that a State thus organized is to be admit. That the National Democracy of the United States ted into the Union, Slavery or no Slavery. hold these cardinal principles on the subject of Slavery in the Territories : First, that Congress has no power to
The day was spent in fierce debate, without abolish Slavery in the Territories ; second, that the Ter coming to a vote on any of these various proporitorial Legislature has no power to abolish Slavery in sitions. the Territories, nor to prohibit the introduction of slaves
On the 28th, Senator Wm. Bigler, of Penntherein, nor any power to destroy or impair the right of property in slaves by any legislation whatever. sylvania, moved that the majority and minority
Resoloed, That the enactments of state Legislatures reports be récommitted to the Convention, with to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave instructions to report in an hour, the following Law are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effects.
resolutions : Resoloed, That it is the duty of the Federal Govern- Resowed, “That the Platform adopted by the Demcment to protect the rights of person and property on the cratic party at Cincinnati be affirmed, with the following high seas, in the Territories, or wherever else its jurisdic- explanatory resolution : tion extends.
Resowed, That the Government of a Territory, orResoloed, That it is the duty of the Government of ganized by an act of Congress, is provisional and tempothe United States to afford protection to naturalized rary, and, during its existence, all citizens of the United citizens from foreign countries.
States have an equal right to settle in the Territory, Resoloed, That it is the duty of the Government of without their rights, either of person or property, being the United States to acquire Cuba at the earliest prac. destroyed or impaired by Congressional or Territorial ticable moment.
Legislation. The principal minority report, which was pre- to the doctrine that it is the duty of Government to
Resowed, That the Democratic party stands pledged sented by Mr. Henry B. Payne, of Ohio, and maintain all the constitutional rights of property, of signed by the members of the committee whatever kind, in the Territories, and to enforce all the from Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode decisions of the Supreme Court in reference thereto.
Resobed, That it is the duty of the United States to Island, Connecticut, New-Jersey, Ohio, Indiana, afford ample and complete protection to all its citizens, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, whether at home or abroad, and whether native or
foreign. New-York, and Pennsylvania, (all the Free
Resoloed, That one of the necessities of the age, in a States except California, Oregon, and Massachu- military, commercial and postal point of view, is speedy setts), reaffirmed the Cincinnati Platform; de- communication between the Atlantic and Pacific States clared that all rights of property are judicial in and the Democratic Party pledge such Constitutional
Government aid as will insure the construction of a their character, and that the Democracy pledge railroad to the Pacific coast at the earliest practical themselves to defer to the decisions of the period. Supreme Court on the subject; ample protec- the acquisition of the Island of Cuba, on such terus as
Resoled, That the Democratic Party are in favor of tion to citizens, native or naturalized, at home shall be honorable to ourselves and just to Spain, or abroad; aid to "a Pacific Railroad;" the Resolved, That the enactments of State Legislatures acquisition of Cuba, and that all State resistance to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave to the Fugitive Slave Law is revolutionary and Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Consti
tution, and revolutionary in their effect. subversive of the Constitution.
Mr. Bigler moved the previous question. Gen. Benj. F. Butler, of Massachusetts, presented another minority report, reaffirming the moved to lay Mr. Bigler's motion on the table.
Mr. W. Montgomery (M. C.), of Pennsylvania, Cincinnati Platform, and declaring Democratic He did not regard as a compromise a proposiprinciples unchangeable in their nature when tion for a Congressional Slave Code and the applied to the same subject matter, and only recommending, in addition to the 'Cincinnati reopening of the African Slave Trade ; but, Platform, a resolution for the protection of all have the effect of tabling the whole subject, he
learning that the adoption of his motion would citizens, whether native or naturalized.
withdrew it. A division of tbe question was Mr. Payne stated that his report, although a called for, and the vote was first taken on the minority one, represented one hundred and seventy-two electoral votes, while the majority 151; but the proposition to instruct the com
motion to recommit, which was carried, 152 to report represented only one hundred and mittee was laid on the table, 242} to 56), as twenty-seven electoral votes.
follows: Mr. James A. Bayard (U. S. Senator), of Delaware, presented another series of resolutions, as Massachusetts, 127; Rhode Island, 4; Connecticut, 5
YEAg.-Maine, 8; New-Hampshire, 5; Vermont, 5; follows:
New-York, 85; Pennsylvania, 8; Delaware, 8; Mary. The first affirmed the Cincinnati Platform. land, 51; Virginia, 15,
North Carolina, 10; South CaroThe second declared that Territorial Govern- lina, 8; Georgia, 10; Florida, 8; Alabama, 9; Louisi.
ana, 6; Mississippi, 7; Texas, 4; Arkansas, 4; Missouri, ments are provisional and temporary, and that 4; Kentucky, 6; Ohio, 23; 'Indiana, 13; Illinois, 11; during their existence all citizens of the United Michigan, 6; Iowa, 4; Minnesota, 4; California, 81 States have an equal right to settle in the Terri- 2427. tories without their rights of either person or 7; Pennsylvania, 15; Maryland, 21; Missouri, 9; Ten
NAYS.—Massachusetts, t; Connecticut, 1; New-Jersey, property being destroyed or impaired by Con- nessee, 11; Kentucky, 7, Indiana, 6; Wisconsin, 5; gressional or Territorial legislation.
California, t; Oregon, 8—567. The third, that it is the duty of the Govern. Subsequently, on the same day, Mr. Avery,
from the majority of the Committee on Platform, trict of Columbia. Now, we maintain that Congress has reported the following:
no right to prohibit or abolish Slavery in the District of
Columbia. Why? Because it is an existing institution. Resoloed, That the platform adopted by the Democratic It becomes the duty of Congress under the Constitution to party at Cincinnati be affirmed, with the following ex- protect and cherish the right of property in slaves in that planatory Resolutions:
District, because the Constitution does not give them the First. That the government of a Territory organized by power to prohibit or establish Slavery. Every session of an act of Congress, is provisional and temporary; and, Congress, Northern men, Southern men, men of all par. during its existence, all citizens of the United States have ties, are legislating to protect, cherish and uphold the insti. an equal right to settle with their property in the Territory tution of Slavery in the District of Columbia. witho
their rights, eit of person or property, being deg- It is said that the Cincinnati platform ambiguous, and troyed or impaired by congressional or territorial legislation. that we must explain it. At the South, we have main.
Second. That it is the duty of the Federal Government, tained that it had no ambiguity; that it did not mean in all its departments, to protect, when necessary, the Popular Sovereignty; but our Northern friends say that rights of persons and property in the Territories, and it does mean Popular Sovereignty. Now, if we are wherever else its constitutional authority extends. going to explain it and to declare its principles, I say
Third. That when the settlers in a Territory having an let us either declare them openly, boldly, squarely, 3 adequate population form a State Constitution, the right or let us leave it as it is in the Cincinnati Platform. I
of sovereignty commences, and, being consummated by want, and we of the South want, no more doubtful plat admission into the Union, they stand on an equal foot- forms upon this or any other question. We desire that Ing with the people of other States; and the State thus this Convention should take a bold, square stand. What organized ought to be admitted into the Federal Union, do the minority of the committee propose? Their solution whether its constitution prohibits or recognizes the institu- is to leave the question to the decision of the Supreme tion of Slavery.
Court, and agree to abide by any decision that may be Fourth. That the Democratic party are in favor of the made by that tribunal between the citizens of a Territory acquisition of the Island of Cuba, on such terms as shall upon the subject. Why, gentlemen of the minority, you be honorable to ourselves and just to Spain, at the earliest cannot help yourselves. That is no concession to us. practicable moment.
There is no necessity for putting that in the platform, beFifth. That the enactments of State legislatures to de- cause I take it for granted that you are all law-abiding feat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are citizens. Every gentleman here from a non-slaveholding hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and State is a law-abiding citizen; and if he be so, why we revolutionary in their effect.
know that when there is a decision of the Supreme Court, Sixth. That the Democracy of the United States recog. even adverse to his views, he will submit to it. dze it as the imperative duty of this Government to pro- You say that this is a judicial question. We say that tect the naturalized citizen in all his rights, whether at it is not. But if it be a judicial question, it is immaterial to bome or in foreign lands, to the same extent as its native- you how the platform is made, because all you will have to born citizens.
say is, “this is a judicial question; the majority of the ConWhereas, one of the greatest necessities of the age, in a vention were of one opinion; I may entertain my own opinpolitical, commercial, postal and military point of view, is ion upon the question ; let the Supreme Court settle it."* a speedy communication between the Pacific and Atlan- Let us make a platform about which there can be no tic coasts: Therefore be it
doubt, so that every man, North and South, may stand Resolved, that the Democratic party do bereby pledge side by side on all issues connected with Slavery, and adthemselves to use every means in their power to secure the vocate the same principles. That is all we ask. All we passage of some bill, to the extent of the constitutional demand at your hands is, that there shall be no equivocaauthority of Congress, for the construction of a Pacific tion and no doubt in the popular mind as to what our Railroad, from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, principles are. at the earliest practicable moment. Mr. Avery took the floor, and spoke at length and, in the course of his argument, said:
Mr. H. B. Payne, of Ohio, replied at length, in favor of his report, and in the course of his remarks said :
The question of Slavery had distracted the Courts and
the party since 1820, and we hoped by the Compromise I have stated that we demand at the hands of our measures of 1850, the Kansas law of 1854, and the PlatNorthern brethren upon this floor that the great principle form of 1852 and 1856, that the policy of the Democratic which we cherish should be recognized, and in that view I party was a united and settled policy in respect to Afrispeak the common sentiments of our constituents at home; can slavery.
The Democracy of the North and I intend no reflection upon those who entertain a differ-have, throughout, stood by the South in vindication of ent opinion, when I say that the results and ultimate conse- their constitutional rights. For this they claim no quences to the Southern States of this confederacy, if the credit. They have simply discharged their constitutional Popular Sovereignty doctrine be adopted as the doctrine duty; and, though some Southern Senators may rise in. of the Democratic party, would be as dangerous and sub- their places and stigmatize us as unsound and rotten, we versive of their rights as the adoption of the principle of say we have done it in good faith, and we challege contraCongressional intervention or prohibition. We say that, in diction. We have supposed that this doctrine of Popular a contest for the occupation of the Territories of the United Sovereignty was a final settlement of the Slavery difficulty. States, the Southern men encumbered with slaves cannot You so understood it in the South. We are not claiming compete with the Emigrant Aid Society at the North. We anything in our Platform but what the Cincinnati Platform say that the Emigrant Aid Society can send a voter to one was admitted to have established. of the Territories of the United States, to determine a What was the doctrine of 1856? Non-intervention by question relating to slavery, for the sum of $200, while it Congress with the question of Slavery, and the submission would cost the Southern man the sum of $1500. We say, of the question of Slavery in the Territories, under the then, that wherever there is competition between the Constitution, to the People. South and North, that the North can and will, at less ex- It is said that one construction has been given to the pense and difficulty, secure power, control and dominion Platform at the South and another at the North. He over the Territories of the Federal Government; and if, could prove from the Congressional debates that from then, you establish the doctrine that a Territorial Legisla- 1850 to 1856 there was not a dissenting opinion expressed Lure which may be established by Congress in any Terri- in Congress on this subject. tory has the right, directly or indirectly, to affect the insti
To show that Squatter Sovereignty had been tution of Slavery, then you can see that the Legislature by its action, either directly or indirectly, may finally ex. generally accepted as the true Democratic docdude every man from the slaveholding states as ef. trine, Mr. Payne quoted from eminent Southern fectually as if you had adopted the Wilmot Proviso out Democratic Statesmen as follows: and out.
But we are told that, in advocating the doctrine we now FROX A SPEECH OF HON. HOWELL COBB, OF GEORGIA, do, we are violating the principles of the Cincinnati platform. They say that the Cincinnati platform is a Popular majority of the people of Kansas should decide this
“I stand upon a principle. I hold that the will of the made this report deny that this is the true construction of sion of the people there. l'hold to the right of the People practically enforce that great principle. Now, we who / question, and I say here to-night, before this people and
before this country, that I, for one, shall abide the decito the Cincinnati platform. We of the South say that when to self-government. I am willing for them to decide thits pe we voted for the Cincinnati platforin we understood, from Bi the fact that the Territories stand in the same position as
question." the District of Columbia, that non-interference and nonintervention in the Territories was that same sort of non- “I would not plant Slavery upon the soil of any porInterference and non-intervention forbidden in the Dig. I tion
of God's earth
against the will of the people. The
FROM THE SAME