« ForrigeFortsett »
ment, Luke xri. 23; or in general, Rev. i. 18; vi.
PARKHURST. This word occurs 11 times in the New Testament, and is translated,
Hell, Matt. xi. 23, brought down to hell ; xvi. 18, gates of h. Luke x. 15, down to h. xvi. 23, in h. he ; Acis ii. 27, 31, in h. Rev. i. 18, keys of h. vi. 8, h. sol. lowed : xx. 13, 14, death and hell.
Grave, 1 Cor. xv. 55, O grave, where is thy victory ?
henna of fire, Matt. v. 22, does, I apprehend, in its
and to the future vengeance of an offended God. (2) It commonly denotes immediately hell, the place or
slate of the damned. In Mark is. 43, 44, &c. our
"Gaienna," says our Lexicographer, “is used by the LXX for the Heb. GIENEM. Joshua xviii. 16. So Geenna of the N. T. is in like mapper a corruption of the two Heb. words, gr. a valley, and EMEM, Hinnon, the pame of a person who was once the possessor of it. This valley of Hinnom lay near Jerusalem, and had been the place of those abominable sacrifices in which the idolatrous Jews burned their children alive to Moleck, Baal, or the Sun."
Gecang, or Gehenna as the word is spelt in Latin, is used 12 times in the New Testament, and is always translated hell. All the places, therefore, in which we find the word hell in tbe N. T. is geenna in the Greek, except what are mentioned under the word hadēs and in 2 Pet. ii. 4. Tartarosas, from tartaroo, is there render
ed cast down to hell. Lexicographers explain tartaroo, to cast into tartarus or prison. Montanus renders tariarosas by detrudens in tartarum. This word is used in no other passage of scripture, but is said to be found in a number of instances, in the writings of the Gre+k
In the Hebrew of the Old Testament we find but one word used for hell, which is Saool, + the invisible state of the dead, the place anıl
stale of those who are out of the way, and to be sought for
PARKUURST. "In this view," says Parkhurst, "it seems nearly 10 answer to the Greek hadēs (hy which the LXX almost constantly render it) i. e. ho aidēs topos, the invisible place, and to our old English word hell, which though now scarcely used but for the place of torment, yet being a derivative from the Saxon billan or helan to hide, or from holl a cavern, anciently denoted the concealed or unseen place of the dead in general, as is manifest from the version of Psal. xlix. 14; Iv. 15; Ixxxviii. 3 ; Ixxxix. 48, in K. Henry VIII's Great Bible.”
6.Queber denotes the grave or sepulchre, properly so called; saool signifies that which is cominon to all, the common receptacle of the dead. Thus Leigh in his
*Socrates, an ancient heathen philosopher, according to Rollin, uses this word in expressing his views of hell in the following manner: “Those who are judged to be incurable upon account of the greatness of their crimes, who from deliberate will, have committed sacrileges and murders, and other such great offences, the fatal destiny that passes judgement upon them, hurls them into Tartarus, from whence they never depart. But those who are found guilty of crimes, great indeed, but worthy of pardon ; who have committed violences in the transports of rage against their father or mother, or have killed some one in a like emotion, and afterwards repented, these suffer the same punishment, and in the same place with the last ; but for a time only, till by their prayers and supplications they have ohtained pardon from those they have injured.” Ancient History, Vol. IV. page 322.
+ This is the same word that is called Sheol in a note, page 53, Vol. I. it being there spelt according to the points.
to the g.
Critica Sacra well. remarks, that "Jacob, Gen. xxxvií. 35, would go down mourning into Sheol to his son ; not into Hell (the place of the damned,) for he never thought his son to be gone thither, por into the grave properly so named, for he thought his son had been devoured by a wild beast ; but into the receptacle of the dead." Is not SADOL sometimes used for a great "Depth under ground; out of sight and to be sougbt for” (Bate, without any reference to the dead ? See Deut. xxxii. 22: Job xi. 8. Ps, cxxxix. 8. Ezek. Xxxi. 17. Amos ix. 2."
Saool is the only word rendered hell that I can find in the 0. T. and the only Greek word that I can find. thus translated, is hadēs. Saool is rendered,
Grave, Gen. xxxvii. 35, go down to the grave ; xlii.. 38, with sorrow to the g. xliv. 3.1 ; 1 K. ii. 6, 9, down.
Job xvii. 13, the gi is my house ;. Ps. xlix.. 15, power of the g. lxxxix. 48. hand of the g. cxli. 7, theg. mouth; xlix. 14, 15; Prov. i 12 ; Isai. siv. 11, down to the. g. Isai. xxxviii. 18; Hosea siii. 14, ran. som from the power of the g. O grave.
Pit, Num. xvi. 30, 33. down, quick into the pit ; Job. xvii. 16; the bars of the pit.. There are a variety of other Hebrew words which are translated pit in the. Old Testament. These are all the places that I have found in wbich sA00L is ihus rendered.
It has become an opinion, (I'know not but an almost. general opinion) that the Greek hadēs does not represent the place of torment, the future habitation of damned souls. This sentiment I have heard expressed by a number of believers in endless. misery; who are conversant with the Greek language: Admitting this idea, we find no word in the Old Testament either Hebrew or Greek, that carriesian idea of what is commonly understood by hell ; that describes a particular place of misery : for the Hebrew saOOL and the Greek hadēs,
bich correspond to each other, have a very similar meaning. There remains. but one word in the New Testament that is ever applied to men, which they can consider as a proper name of the place, according to
their own concessions. We find but a solitary instance, namely in 2 Pet ii. 4, in which there is thought to be an allusion to any other. Gehenna, which is considered the only proper name of hell in the original of the New Testament, had its origin from idolatrous sacrifi
If there be a hell co-existent with the abodes of the blessedl, is it not strange, that it should have remained anonymous, till Moses and the prophets had Snished their testimony ? Besides, by the concession of the learned PARKHURST, we see that the English word, used to describe the place of endless forment, 300 years ago, had a very different meaning both hy derivation and use. The fact, undoubtedly, is, that where the wicked and misery are, there is hell, whether in the present or future state ; and where the righteous and felicity are, there is the heaven that we need. There was, undoubtedly, no hell, till the wicked began to exist ; nor will there be any hell, when the wicked shall be no more.
“For yet a little while, and the wickel shall not be; yea, thou shalt diligenlly coosider his place, and it shall not be," P8. xxxvii. 10.
From the Unitarian Miscellany.
CHRIST AND THE FATHER ONE.
One of the most common texts quoted by trinitarians to prove that the Son and the Father are the same being, is that in which Christ says, “I anıl my Father are one."
If we look a little into the context we shal perceive that ia whatever sense these words ought to be taken, they cannot possibly mean, that Christ was the same being as the Father. He had been speaking to the Jews the parable of the good shepherd, and, in alluding to his owo death, he said he had authority to lay down his life, and to receive it again. But he isomediately after adds, that he had received this commandment from the Father ; that is, it was by the will and power of the Father, and not of himself, that he was able to lay down his life, and receive it again. He also speaks of doing his works in his Pather's name. He says his sheep were given him by his Father, and repres'ents himself as one, "whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent'into the world.” Now let it be asked, whether it were possible for him to use such language, if he were actually speaking of bimself, when he refers to the Fa. ther ? No one can believe this, who would draw any consistent meaning from his discourse. It is obvious from these passages, that when he spoke of himself and the Father being one, he could not incan they were the game being, or person, but that they were united in accomplishing the same object. He acted by the command of God, and by the power, which was given him, and did nothing except in accordance with The divine will:
Such is the conclusion, which a rational interpretation would bring out of the passage itself. And this is confirmed by comparing scripture with scripture, which, after all, is the best rule that ean be followed. In the seventeenth chapter of John; our Savior has explicitly told 118 what we are to understand by his being one with the Father. He prays thus; “Holy Father, keep through thine own name those, whom thou bast given me, that they may be one, as we are." Agair; “The glory, which thou gavest me, I have given them, that they may be one. even as we are one ; I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one ; and that the world may know, that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, As i hou hast loved me. Here our Savior prays, not nly, that he and his disciples may be one, but that they also may be one, in the same sense, as he and his Father are one. From what has been said, it is plain, that it might just as well be inferred that Christ and his disciples were one and the same being, as that he and the Father were one and the same, His language is precisely the same in one case, as it is in the other,
*John xviim11, 21,