 An accommodation party is one who has signed the instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser, without receiving value therefor, and for the purpose of lending his name to some other person. Such a person is liable on the instrument to a holder...  Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association - Side 309av Louisiana State Bar Association - 1914Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1910 - 748 sider
...to ac, commodation parties the provision (section 3172«) is: "[Liability of accommodation party.] An accommodation party is one who has signed the instrument...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." As to those primarily liable it provides that: "The person primarily liable upon an instrument is the... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 sider
..."An accommodation party is one who has signed the instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or endorser, without receiving value therefor, and for the purpose...Instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." Section 60: "The maker of a negotiable instrument by making it engages that he will pay it according... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 sider
...Massachusetts, being chapter 73 of the Revised Laws of said state, contains the following provisions : "Sec. 46. An accommodation party is one who has signed the Instrument...Instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." "Sec. 69. A holder In due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following conditions:... | |
 | 1910 - 2132 sider
...implication of law, he is deemed a holder for value to the extent of his lien." Section 29 declares: "An accommodation party is one who has signed the...Instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." Tested by these statutes, the liability of the defendants under the facts in proof is, I think, too... | |
 | Henry Clay Brubaker, Charles Israel Landis, George Ross Eshleman, Issac Clinton Arnold - 1921 - 632 sider
...dispute between the parties. Under the Negotiable Instruments Act of May 16, 1901, PL 194, Section 29, " an accommodation party is one who has signed the instrument...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." He is, however, not liable to the principal to whom he is loaning his name simply as an accommodation.... | |
 | 1910 - 1168 sider
...then, to the whole law and not to the particular section, we find that It is also declared: "Sec. 29. An accommodation party Is one who has signed the Instrument...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." "Sec. 60. The maker of a negotiable instrument by making it engages that he will pay It according to... | |
 | 1911 - 1164 sider
...and for the purpose of lending his name to some other person." And the section further declares that "such a person is liable on the instrument to a holder...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." The mere fact therefore that this note was an accommodation note, would not constitute a defense against... | |
 | 1913 - 1134 sider
...any person not a' holder in due courte. Section 29 defines an accommodation party, and provides that such a person is liable on the instrument to a holder...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party. In view of the general scope and declaratory provisions of said act, we are of the opinion that the... | |
 | 1903 - 1164 sider
...receiving value therefor, and for the purpose of lending his name to some other person. Such a party is liable on the Instrument to a holder for value,...instrument, knew him to be only an accommodation party." It is obvious from the above language of the Code, and from that of Maitland's Case, that an accommodation... | |
 | 1919 - 1050 sider
...same topic and KEY-NUMBEK in all Key-Numbered Digests ала Indexes er pprson. Such n person is Hablo on the instrument to a holder for value, notwithstanding...instrument knew him to be only an accommodation party." Act May 16. 11Ю1 '(PL 1Î14Ï § 20. [2] It Is further contended by the appellee tnat by the terms... | |
| |
