 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - 1823 - 726 sider
...plaintiffs, submitted, that it was only necessary to advert to the will of the 22d of October, 1778, to shew, that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any part of his estate. That intent is manifested in the body of the will; if not, the residuary clause... | |
 | Roper Stote Donnison Roper - 1829 - 630 sider
...the present case ; and, considering the residuary clause which enumerated only personal chattels, and that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any part of his property, he thought the construction the family had put upon the whole will was the true... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1868 - 624 sider
...heir-at-law will not be divested, except the intent be clear. But it is perfectly clear in this case that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any portion of his estate. Neither of his children can take anything by operation of law, as next of kin. They must take... | |
 | 1851 - 752 sider
...aforesaid trust estate and effects to his executors. Upon this will nothing can be more clear than that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any portion of the property belonging to him either at the period of his will or of his death. Words occur in the... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Chancery, Alonzo Christopher Paige - 1838 - 712 sider
...the intention would have been apparent and without doubt. It is perfectly clear from the whole will, that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any part of the Westchester property ; and yet, upon the construction contended for by the complainant's... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1845 - 930 sider
...may be applied to the other devises, in which certain lauds are specifically mentioned. It is plain that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any part of his property. Yarnold v. Wallis (a) is an authority for the plaintiff. Again, it may be argued,... | |
 | Edmund Hatch Bennett, Chauncey Smith - 1851 - 680 sider
...aforesaid trust estate and effects to his executors. Upon that will nothing can be more clear than that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any portion of the property belonging to him, either at the period Stokes v. Salomons. of his will or of his death.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 802 sider
...contrary to another well-settled rule for the construction of wills, namely, that it will be presumed that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any of his property, for the reason that such construction would leave Royal Mudge, Sr., intestate as to... | |
 | 1857 - 646 sider
...God to bestow upon me, I give " the same in manner following." Now such a clause, importing LALOR. that the testator did not intend to die intestate, as to any part of his wordly estate, real or personal, has always been looked upon as of great weight in determining... | |
| |
From all this, it would appear that the testator did not intend to die intestate as to any portion of his property... 
