E.F. Hutton mail and wire fraud case: hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, on E.F. Hutton mail and wire fraud case ....

Forside

Inni boken

Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale

Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.

Innhold

Document by Stephen A Laserson on meeting with Tom Morley and Kevin
194
Memorandum from Christopher T Mahoney to John Svengle
200
Letter from Karen de Klerk to Joseph DiDonato dated May 22 1985
209
Memorandum from Thomas P Morley to Mike Castellano on BOA check
215
Letter from Diana DeMarco to Thomas Morley dated April 12 1985
241
Letter from Thomas F Curnin to Thomas W Rae dated May 3 1985
247
Bank receipts from Commonwealth National Bank Harrisburg
253
Memorandum from NADOperations Administration to Chris Mahoney
262
Memorandum from Steve Bralove to Perry Bacon on Institutional and Bank
268
Letter from Francis G Addison to George L Ball dated April 30 1982
279
Letter from Francis G Addison to Thomas P Morley dated April 30 1982
285
Memorandum from Michael P Castellano on interest earned on regional
292
Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report for May 1985
298
Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report for April 1985
313
Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report for February
360
Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report for December
392
WITNESSES
416
Rae Thomas general counsel and executive vice president E F Hutton
452
Organizational charts of E F Hutton Co Inc 456 Organizational charts of E F Hutton Co
466
business done with Northeast Forms dated October 30 1985
485
Memorandum from Thomas P Morley to Regional Operations Managers
494
Letter from Christopher T Mahoney to Thomas P Lynch dated May
498
Memorandum from Thomas P Morley to Robert Ross on regional drawdowns
503
Memorandum from E F Hutton Co Inc on misencoded checks dated
510
Letter from Zoe E Baird to the Honorable William J Hughes dated October
538
Report of Postal Inspector J A Holland dated February 28 1985
630
Letter from Stephen S Trott to David D Queen dated December 31 1984
634
Letter from Robert W Ogren to Charles A Stillman dated August 7 1984
645
Letter from Thomas F Curnin to Robert W Ogren dated April 2 1985
651
Letter from Thomas F Curnin to Peter B Clark dated April 25 1985
657
Letter from Thomas F Curnin to Albert R Murray dated March 12 1985
663
Letter from Thomas F Curnin to Albert R Murray dated March 28 1985
669
Transcript of pretrial conference United States v E F Hutton Co Inc
720
Transcrip of pretrial conference United States v E F Hutton Co Inc
778
Wire from T mas P Morley to Ralph Williams and Joe McAdams dated
854
Complaint for permanent injunction and ancillary relief United States v E
864
Criminal information United States v E F Hutton Co Inc
879
Consent and undertaking of the E F Hutton Group Inc and E F Hutton
887
Final Judgment of permanent injunction against E F Hutton Group Inc
896
Notice of plea agreement plea agreement and exhibits
924
Memorandum from Tom Lillis to George Ball dated April 23 1980
1031
Letter from Vincent S Puccia to William Sullivan dated August 3 1979
1039
Letter from Judith A Spafford to William Sullivan dated March 28 1980
1048
Document on branch overdrafting of bank accounts
1077
Memorandum from George L Ball to regional vice presidents regional sales
1089
Financial analysis for WilkesBarre branch by U S Department of Justice
1103
Checking account statement of E F Hutton at National City Bank of Cleve
1115
Memorandum from Mercedes E Neff dated March 26 1982
1127
Letter from Zoe E Baird to Virginia Sloan dated December 4 1985
1134
Memorandum from Robert Mencer to cashiers Pacific North and South
1162

Andre utgaver - Vis alle

Vanlige uttrykk og setninger

Populære avsnitt

Side 799 - ... at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Side 587 - PENALTIES. Whoever makes a false statement of a material fact knowing it to be false, or knowingly fails to disclose a material fact, or whoever willfully overvalues any security, for the purpose of influencing in any way the action...
Side 368 - ... the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly the financial position of EF Hutton & Company Inc.
Side 368 - Schedules 1 and 2 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion.
Side 799 - ... for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail...
Side 835 - ... as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Williams, 458 DS 279 (1982) . The theory prosecutors traditionally employed was that an overdraft check constituted an "overvalued security" or a "false statement" to the bank which honored it.
Side 368 - Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
Side 587 - Whoever makes any statement knowing it to be false, or whoever willfully overvalues any security, for the purpose of obtaining for himself or for any applicant any loan, or extension thereof by renewal, deferment of action, or otherwise, or the acceptance, release, or substitution of security therefor...
Side 399 - Thus, when testimony or data is sought for its own sake — for its intrinsic value in the furtherance of a lawful investigation — rather than to learn what took place before the grand jury, it is not a valid defense to disclosure that the same information was revealed to a grand jury or that the same documents had been, or were presently being, examined by a grand jury.
Side 782 - GHERMAN, knowingly, willfully and unlawfully devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and...

Bibliografisk informasjon