 ... a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at his peril, and that, if it does mischief, negligence is presumed without express averment.  The New-York Legal Observer - Side 408redigert av - 1846Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Francis Joseph Coltman - 1866 - 662 sider
...examination of all the authorities appears to us to be this : that a person keeping a mischievous animal with knowledge of its propensities is bound to keep...negligence is presumed, without express averment." May it not be said that an animal having an infectious disease is a " mischievous" animal ? Perhaps... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 744 sider
...opinion will also point out very clearly for what matters railway compakeeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at his peril." And Lord Hale (1 Hale's PC 430) states, that where one keeps a beast, knowing its nature is such that the... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1869 - 620 sider
...examination of all the authorities appears to us to be this, — that a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep...negligence is presumed, without express averment. (b) The precedents, as well as the authorities, fully warrant this conclusion." In (.'otton v. Brown,... | |
 | 1871 - 530 sider
...old precedents and authorities, comes to the conclusion, that 'a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at his peril.' And in 1 Hale's Pleas of the Crown, 430, Lord Hale states that when one keeps a beast, knowing its nature... | |
 | 1901 - 510 sider
...was not the gist of the plaintiff's cause of action, saying: " A person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at his peril." * * * This would have been sufficient, but the learned judge, evidently not contented with a strictly... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1871 - 338 sider
...examination of all the authorities appears to us to be this—that a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep...negligence is presumed without express averment." There is no distinction between the case of the keeping of an animal which breaks through the ordinary... | |
 | United States. Circuit Courts, Benjamin Vaughan Abbott - 1871 - 648 sider
...old precedents and authorities, comes to the conclusion that. 'a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at his peril.' And in 1 Bale's Pleas of the Parrott v. Barney. Grown, 430, Lord HALE states that when one keeps a beast,... | |
 | India - 1874 - 656 sider
...examination of all the authorities appears to be this, that a person keeping a mischievous animal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep it secure at hi» peril; and that if it doea mischief, negligence is presumed, without express averment. The negligence... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 sider
...examination of all the authorities appears to us to be this : that a person keeping a mischievous auimal, with knowledge of its propensities, is bound to keep...of Smith v. Pelah, 2 Stra. 1264, and a passage in 1 Hale's Pleas of the Crown, 430,1 put the liahility on the true ground. It may be that, if the injury... | |
| |
