Public and Private Rights in the Public Domain, Del 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1910 - 125 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 24
Side 10
... owner of the land might get out enough coal for his own use . The value of his land is greatly diminished if he is held entirely to the surface . While it would not be valuable for general mining pur- poses there should be some way by ...
... owner of the land might get out enough coal for his own use . The value of his land is greatly diminished if he is held entirely to the surface . While it would not be valuable for general mining pur- poses there should be some way by ...
Side 18
... owner , or otherwise : Provided , That the Secre- tary of the Interior may waive the foregoing limitation in cases where the economical working and development of the coal deposits may require , if , in his judgment , it will not result ...
... owner , or otherwise : Provided , That the Secre- tary of the Interior may waive the foregoing limitation in cases where the economical working and development of the coal deposits may require , if , in his judgment , it will not result ...
Side 20
... owner- ship , or control , in excess of two thousand five hundred and sixty acres in the district of Alaska , the title thereto shall be forfeited to the United States by proceedings instituted by the Attorney - General of the United ...
... owner- ship , or control , in excess of two thousand five hundred and sixty acres in the district of Alaska , the title thereto shall be forfeited to the United States by proceedings instituted by the Attorney - General of the United ...
Side 31
... owner , and the riparian owner has no property in the water , how can you regulate it ? Did you ever think of that ? When you come to think of the water - power question , what property has the United States Government in the water ? Mr ...
... owner , and the riparian owner has no property in the water , how can you regulate it ? Did you ever think of that ? When you come to think of the water - power question , what property has the United States Government in the water ? Mr ...
Side 36
... owner of the water , has the right to limit , while the National Government has not . Mr. GARFIELD . True , but the National Government has the right to dispose or not dispose of its land . Senator CLARK , of Wyoming . But it is only ...
... owner of the water , has the right to limit , while the National Government has not . Mr. GARFIELD . True , but the National Government has the right to dispose or not dispose of its land . Senator CLARK , of Wyoming . But it is only ...
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
act of Congress agricultural applicable authority bill BROWNE California cession CHAIRMAN charges citizens classification coal land commerce committee connection conservation Constitution dispose electric eminent domain ernment Executive exercise exists Federal Government GARFIELD government lands grant horsepower impose interest Interior irrigation JAMES RUDOLPH GARFIELD jurisdiction laws lease legislation lessees limits lumber ment miles mineral mining Mississippi River monopoly navigable waters Northern Pacific Railroad operate phosphate police power Power Company present private owner private proprietor provision public domain public lands purposes question railroads right of eminent riparian River rules and regulations San Joaquin River Secretary Senator CLARK Senator DIXON Senator FLINT Senator HEYBURN Senator JONES Senator MCCUMBER Senator NEWLANDS Senator SMOOT SHORT sovereign sovereignty Spokane Spokane River statute stream Supreme Court territory timber tion Union United States Government water power water rights water-power withdrawal Wyoming
Populære avsnitt
Side 30 - That the Secretary of the Interior be, and hereby is, authorized and empowered, under general regulations to be fixed by him, to permit the use of rights of way through the public lands, forest and other reservations of the United .States...
Side 80 - To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States...
Side 91 - Sitting, as it were, as an international, as well as a domestic tribunal, we apply Federal law, state law, and international law, as the exigencies of the particular case may demand, and we are unwilling, in this case, to proceed on the mere technical admissions made by the demurrer.
Side 30 - ... association, or corporation of the United States, where it is intended by such to exercise the use permitted...
Side 30 - ... water plants, dams, and reservoirs used to promote irrigation or mining or quarrying, or the manufacturing or cutting of timber or lumber, or the supplying of water for domestic, public, or any other beneficial uses...
Side 64 - First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second, the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original States.
Side 29 - That every person above the age of twenty-one years, who is a citizen of the United States...
Side 79 - When Alabama was admitted into the Union, on an equal footing with the original States, she succeeded to all the rights of sovereignty, jurisdiction and eminent domain, which Georgia possessed at the date of the cession, except so far as this right was diminished by the public lands remaining in the possession...
Side 91 - The private right to appropriate is subject not only to the rights of lower owners but to the initial limitation that it may not substantially diminish one of the great foundations of public welfare and health. We are of opinion, further, that the constitutional power of the State to insist that its natural advantages shall remain unimpaired by its citizens is not dependent upon any nice estimate of the extent of present use or speculation as to future needs.
Side 91 - It is fundamental, and we are of opinion that the private property of riparian proprietors can not be supposed to have deeper roots. Whether it be said that such an interest justifies the cutting down by statute, without compensation, in the exercise of the police power, of what otherwise would be private rights of property, or that apart from statute those rights do not go to the height of what the defendant seeks to do, the result is the same. But we agree with the New Jersey courts, and think...