 The fact remains that the occurrence had ended when the declaration in question was made, and the engineer was not in the act of doing anything that could possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely...  City Court Reports - Side 364av New York (State). Marine Court (New York), Daniel T. Robertson, Edward Jacobs - 1889Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1903
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...view should be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company, would have been admissible in its behalf... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1887
...possibly affect It. If this declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...view should be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company, would have been admissible in its behalf... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1887
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...view should be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company, would have been admissible in its behalf... | |
 | 1887
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...— after the accident, cannot, upon principle, make thia case an exception to the general rule. If the contrary view should be maintained, it would follow... | |
 | 1887
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...And yet the circumstance that it was made between 10 and 30 minutes — an appreciable period of time — after the accident, cannot, upon principle,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1887
...affect it. If his 119 rs declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against the Company. And yet the circumstance that it wasmade between ten and thirty minutes, an appreciable period of time, after the accident, cannot,... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1889 - 979 sider
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...view should be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer if favorable to the company, would have been admissible in its behalf... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1891
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...view should be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company, would have been admissible in its behalf... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1893 - 748 sider
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...exception to the general rule. If the contrary view shall be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company,... | |
 | Ernest Wilson Huffcut - 1896 - 412 sider
...possibly affect it. If his declaration had been made the next day after the accident, it would scarcely be claimed that it was admissible evidence against...exception to the general rule. If the contrary view shall be maintained, it would follow that the declarations of the engineer, if favorable to the company,... | |
| |
