Abandonment.
See Contest.
Adverse Claim.
See Mining Claim.
Paragraph 13 of regulations of August 1, 1904, relating to townsites in Alaska, amended-
The provisions of section 6 of the act of May 14, 1898, conferring upon the Secretary of the Interior author- ity to sell to the owner or owners of a wagon road or tramway, not to ex- ceed twenty acres of public land, for terminal facilities, at each end of the road, contemplates the sale of an ab- solute fee in the lands, and where the lands, at the date applied for, are included within a forest reserve, they are not subject to sale under said section, notwithstanding the wagon road or tramway in connec- tion with which they are desired may have been constructed prior to the creation of the reserve-----
In view of the provisions of the act of February 1, 1905, transferring to the Secretary of Agriculture the execution of certain laws affecting public lands within the limits of for- est reserves, and the construction placed upon that act by the Secre- tary of the Interior and concurred in by the Secretary of Agriculture, ap- plications for permits for use of rights of way within forest reserves on account of wagon roads or tram- ways, under section 6 of the act of May 14, 1898, come within the juris- diction and control of the Secretary of Agriculture
Allotment.
See Indian Lands.
Amendment.
See Application.
No rights are acquired by an ap- plication to purchase under the tim- ber and stone act presented at a time when the land is not subject to such appropriation
Pending the disposition of a school land indemnity selection, even though erroneously received, no oth- er application including any portion of the land embraced in such selec- tion should be accepted, nor will any rights be considered as initiated by the tender of any such application__
Applicants for public lands lose no rights by mistakes and laches of officers of the land department; but persons claiming the benefit of this rule must show that they have an in- choate right and that they have not been so dilatory in assertion of it as to give rival bona fide applicants a superior right
An application to amend a home- stead entry, as well as all affidavits filed in support thereof, should be executed before some officer desig- nated by section 2294 of the Re- vised Statutes and the acts of March 11, 1902, and March 4, 1904, amend- ing that section__.
An appeal from the rejection of a defective application to enter does not operate to reserve the land and entitles the applicant only to a judg- ment as to the correctness of such action at the time it was taken, and where the application was properly rejected, it is immaterial, in the face of an adverse appropriation of the land, whether the applicant received proper notice of such action_______ 541 Where a foreign-born homestead applicant fails to file with his appli- cation proof of naturalization, or that he has declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, it is within the discretion of the local officers to receive and hold the application and afford the appli- cant an opportunity to furnish the required proof, or to reject the ap- plication outright, in which latter event it can have no effect to segre-
Lands withdrawn under the pro- visions of the act of June 17, 1902, from all disposition "except under the homestead laws," are not subject to soldiers' additional entry under section 2306 of the Revised Statutes. 653 An application to make soldiers' additional entry under section 2306 of the Revised Statutes, although filed prior to the passage of the act of June 17, 1902, and pending at the date of an order withdrawing the lands covered thereby under the pro- visions of said act, is not effective to except the lands from such with- drawal
An application to enter under the provisions of section 2306 of the Re- vised Statutes, even though approved by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, will not, prior to the al- lowance of entry thereon, prevent a withdrawal of the land covered there- by under provisions of the act of June 17, 1902 ____.
Directions given relative to the
survey, subdivision, appraisal and sale of certain lands in Idaho with- in the irrigable area of the Minidoka reclamation project, withdrawn from entry, except under the homestead law, for disposal in accordance with the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, and subsequently reserved by the President, under section 2380 of the Revised Statutes, as a town site.
There is nothing in the act of June 17, 1902, to prohibit a graduated scale of the annual payments re quired of users of water from rec- lamation projects constructed under said act, and in all cases where it is deemed advisable this plan of pay- ment may be adopted
The drilling of wells in the vicin ity of an irrigation project, for the purpose of determining whether underground water exists that may be made available in connection with the project, comes within the power conferred by the second section of the act of June 17, 1902,"to make examinations and surveys
the development of waters ". Under the authority conferred upon the Secretary of the Interior by the act of June 17, 1902, he may, in his discretion, enter into contracts for the construction of irrigation works or construct such works by labor em- ployed and operated under the super- intendence and direction of govern- ment officials
No such rights are acquired by set- tlement upon lands embraced in the entry of another as will attach upon cancellation of such entry, where at that time the lands are withdrawn for use in connection with an irriga- tion project under the act of June 17, 1902; nor is there any authority in said act for purchase by the gov- ernment of the settler's claim or of the improvements placed upon the land by him__.
The act of June 17, 1902, contem- plates that the United States shall be the full owner of irrigation works constructed thereunder, and clearly inhibits the acquisition of property, for use in connection with an irriga- tion project, subject to servitudes or perpetual obligation to pay rents to a landlord holding the legal title thereto
Uncompleted claims to lands with- drawn under the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, and determined to be needed for construction of irri- gation works in connection with a project that has been found practi- cable, should not be allowed to be
perfected, but should remain in the same status as existed at the time the determination was made and the rights of the claimants adjusted upon the basis of that status____.
Lands held by virtue of a desert land entry are held in private owner- ship within the meaning of the act of June 17, 1902, and the entryman or his assignee is entitled to the same rights and privileges and is subject to the same conditions and limitations, so far as the right to the use of water is concerned, as any other owner of lands within the irri- gable area of an irrigation project constructed under the provisions of said act..
All entries of lands withdrawn under the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, are subject to the con- ditions imposed by section 3 thereof, and a revocation of the withdrawal operates to remove those conditions and leaves the entries in the same situation as entries made prior to the withdrawal, and such conditions can not, by force of a second withdrawal, be reimposed upon such of the en- tries made during the period of the first withdrawal as had not been perfected at the date of the second withdrawal
The provision of section 5 of the act of June 17, 1902, restricting the sale of a right to use water for land in private ownership to not more than one hundred and sixty acres, will not prevent the recognition of a vested water right for a larger area and protection of the same by allow- ing the continued flowage of the water covered by the right through the works constructed by the gov
The Secretary of the Interior has authority to make temporary leases of lands reserved or acquired by pur- chase for use in connection with an irrigation project contemplated un- der the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, where use under the pro- posed lease will not interfere with the use and control of the lands when needed for the purposes con- templated by the reservation or pur- chase
A homesteader whose entry is within the irrigable area of an irri- gation project under the act of June 17, 1902, but not subject to the re- strictions, limitations and conditions of said act, can not, under the law, prior to the acquisition of title to the land, enter into an agreement to convey to a water-users associa-
tion any portion of the land em- braced in his entry, to be held in trust by such association and sold for the benefit of the homesteader to persons competent to make entry of such lands
The fact that the act of April 18, 1896, provides that the lands in the abandoned portion of the Fort As- siniboine military reservation, there- by opened to entry, shall be dis- posed of only under the laws therein specifically named, does not prevent a withdrawal, under the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, of any of said lands as to which no vested right has attached
Lands formerly within the Fort Buford military reservation were by the act of May 19, 1900, restored to the public domain and made subject to existing laws relating to disposal of the public lands, except such laws as are not specifically named therein, and are subject to withdrawal under the reclamation act as other por- tions of the public domain subject to entry under the general land laws; and a withdrawal of such lands for reclamation purposes is effective as to all of the lands for which entry was not made within three months from the filing of the township plat, and prior to the with- drawal
The power conferred upon the Sec- retary of the Interior by the act of June 17, 1902, to make the neces- sary withdrawals to carry into effect the provisions of the act, and to ac- quire rights and property for the purpose contemplated, implies the right to appropriate for irrigation purposes public lands to which the United States has the full legal and equitable title, but the inchoate rights acquired by a bona fide settle- ment made in pursuance of and in strict compliance with the public land laws should not be arbitrarily taken without compensation. In de- termining the compensation it should be considered with reference to the loss sustained by the settler in depriving him of his inchoate right by the arbitrary taking of lands which he had cultivated, im- proved and resided upon under au- thority of law with a view to the acquisition of the title___
The Secretary of the Interior has no authority under the provisions of the seventh section of the act of June 17, 1902, to compensate settlers upon lands within the limits of a withdrawal made in connection with
an irrigation project unless they have in good faith acquired an in- choate right to the land by com- plying with the requirements of law up to the date of the withdrawal and have such a claim as ought to be re- spected by the United States__
Withdrawals under the provisions of the act of June 17, 1902, in con- nection with irrigation projects, will be made as follows:
1. When a site has been selected with a view to making an examina- tion and survey for the purpose of determining whether the construc- tion of an irrigation project upon such site is practicable and advis able, a withdrawal will immediately be made of all lands believed to be susceptible of irrigation from such contemplated works, in accordance with the second form of withdrawal provided for by the third section of the act of June 17, 1902, and at the same time a preliminary withdrawal will be made of lands that may be needed for use in the construction and operation of the works, which will reserve such lands from entry of every character but will not affect entries previously made.
2. As soon as it shall be deter- mined that the project is practicable and advisable and the construction of the same is approved and author- ized by the Secretary of the Interior, a withdrawal will be made of all public lands shown by the examina- tion and survey to be required for use in the construction and opera- tion of the works, and all persons who may have made entry of such lands within such withdrawal prior to the preliminary withdrawal and who have not acquired a vested right thereto, will be notified of the appro- priation of their lands for irrigation purposes and that their entries will be canceled and their improvements paid for by the government as pro- vided for by the eighth and ninth sections of the circular of June 6, 1905, unless sufficient cause be shown within sixty days from the date of such notice
Circulars and Instructions.
See Table of, page XXIII.
The affidavit prescribed by para- graph 32 of the coal-land regula-
tions must be made by the claimant himself
A "preference right of entry under section 2348 of the Revised Statutes arises where any person or persons, severally qualified to enter, have opened and improved any coal mine or mines upon the public lands, and are in actual possession of the same; and such right accrues only to the person or persons who have so opened and improved such mine or mines, and have the possession thereof
A 'preference right of entry under section 2348 of the Revised Statutes is not created, or initiated, by the filing of a declaratory state- ment under section 2349. The office of the declaratory statement is to preserve the right, not to create it. If the right does not exist, the declaratory statement has no office to perform and is without force or effect for any purpose---
It is not in all cases essential to the validity of an application to pur- chase coal lands, or to the comple- tion of proceedings thereunder, that the applicant show that he had ac- tually opened and improved a mine of coal on the lands applied for. This is necessary only where the applicant asserts a preference right of entry under the statute and must main- tain his assertion or suffer defeat in favor of another applicant or claim-
It is not essential to the validity of an application by an association of four persons to purchase six hun- dred (or six hundred and forty) acres of coal lands that the appli- cants shall have opened and im- proved a mine or mines of coal on each of the tracts embraced in the application. It is sufficient in such case, where there are no conflicting claimants, that the applicants show that they are severally qualified to purchase, that the lands applied for are of the character subject to sale under the coal land laws, and that as an association of persons the applicants have expended not less than five thousand dollars in working and improving a mine or mines of coal on the lands--- 267
In determining whether a tract of public land contains coal deposits the well known rules of evidence are as applicable as in any other case, and whatever is relevant to and bears in any degree upon the question is ad- missible in evidence..........
In such cases the characteristics peculiar to coal deposits are to be
kept in view, and the presence of such deposits may be determined upon authenticated evidence of con- ditions which constitute the sufficient guide of the geologist or coal ex- pert
Where an association of four per- sons has expended not less than five thousand dollars in working and im- proving a mine or mines of coal on the public lands such association, in the absence of any prior or superior claim, may enter under the coal land laws not exceeding six hundred and forty acres, including such mining improvements, even though no declar- atory statement may have been filed for the lands.
The object and purpose of a declar- atory statement under section 2349 of the Revised Statutes are to give notice of, and to preserve for the period specified in section 2350, a preference right of entry already ac- quired under section 2348; and such preference right of entry is not cre- ated or initiated by the filing of a declaratory statement.
If the privilege of postponing entry in the manner provided by sec- tions 2349 and 2350, after a prefer- ence right of entry shall have been acquired under section 2348, be not desired by the claimant, the filing of a declaratory statement before application or entry is not necessary or required; and in such case, even if the claimant should fail to make application to enter and to pay for the lands within the sixty days al- lowed by section 2349 for filing a declaratory statement, neither the failure in this respect nor failure to file a declaratory statement would operate to forfeit the right to pur- chase and enter the lands except in favor of some other qualified ap- plicant
Under the proviso to section 7 of the act of March 3, 1891, the filing of a protest, bringing to the notice of the government the invalidity or illegality of an entry, within two years from the date of the issuance of the receiver's final receipt, oper- ates to suspend the running of the statute and will defeat confirmation of the entry under said provision whether the land department actu- ally orders an investigation of the matters charged in the protest with- in the two-year period or not 172
The allegation in an affidavit of contest that land" is more valuable for the timber and stone," does not by necessary implication charge that the land is mineral in character and does not constitute a sufficient basis for a contest
An application to contest received by mail will not be regarded as hav- ing been presented or filed until it is taken up, numbered, and entered of record, and where a contest applica- tion is presented in person and in the ordinary course of business is ac- cepted, numbered, and entered of record, and another application to contest the same entry is at that time, unknown to the local officers, in the unopened mail in the office, priority will be accorded the appli- cation first accepted and filed______ 712 DESERT LAND.
A contest based solely upon the ground that the entry is invalid be- cause the land embraced therein is not of the character subject to such entry, may be allowed, notwithstand- ing the entry, at the date of the ini- tiation of the contest, was embraced in an order of suspension issued by the land department.
In case of the suspension of an entry by order of the land depart- ment the entryman is not compelled to comply with the law during the period of suspension, and contest on the ground of failure to comply with the requirements of the law during such period should not be allowed___ 362 Where contest against a suspended entry, on the ground of failure to comply with law, is erroneously al- lowed by the local officers, and hear- ing had thereon, the testimony ad- duced at the hearing, having been taken without jurisdiction, can not be considered upon removal of the suspension
A contest against a desert-land entry, based solely upon the ground that the land is non-desert in char- acter, may properly be entertained during suspension of the entry; but a contest charging that the entry- man has failed to comply with the requirements of the law should not be entertained during such period where the suspension becomes effec- tive prior to the expiration of the statutory life of the entry-
« ForrigeFortsett » |