Lands formerly embraced within the Fort Assinniboine military reser- vation, and opened to entry by the act of April 18, 1896, are subject to selection in lieu of lands within a forest reserve relinquished to the United States under the exchange provisions of the act of June 4, 1897 296
The provision in the act of July 4, 1884, that the lands in the former Columbia Indian reservation by said act restored to the public domain should be disposed of “to actual set- tlers under the homestead laws only," is no bar to the selection of portions of said lands in lieu of an unperfected claim to lands in a for- est reserve, based upon homestead settlement, and relinquished under the exchange provisions of the act of June 4, 1897.
The provision of the act of June 6, 1900, which declares that subse- quently to October 1, 1900, "all se- lections of land made in lieu of a tract covered by an unperfected bona fide claim, or by a patent, in- cluded within a public forest reser- vation, shall be confined to vacant surveyed non-mineral public lands which are subject to homestead entry," applies only to selections made under the provisions of the act of June 4, 1897, and has no appli- cation to selections made by the Northern Pacific Railway Company under the provisions of the act of March 2, 1899
Where at the date of the act of March 3, 1905, repealing the ex- change provisions of the act of June 4, 1897, no selection had been made in lieu of lands within a forest re-
serve relinquished to the United States in accordance with the provi- sions of the act of 1897, the land department is without authority to now permit such selection to be made
In case a selection under the ex- change provisions of the act of June 4, 1897, is canceled for conflict with a prior settlement claim, and another selection for a like quantity of land is made in lieu thereof, under the proviso to the act of March 3, 1905,
the abstract of title of the relin- quished land assigned as a basis for the selection must be extended to the date of the later application.........- 564 A selection under the provisions of the act of June 4, 1897, for a less area than embraced in the relin- quished land offered as a base, not the result of mischance or misprision on the part of the local officers, is a waiver of the excess; and there is nothing in the act of March 3, 1905, repealing the act of June 4, 1897, authorizing the selector to make a further selection based upon such
Where prior to the repeal of the exchange provisions of the act of June 4, 1897, by the act of March 3, 1905, selection was made and ap- proved for unsurveyed lands de- scribed in terms of legal subdivisions of the public surveys, and upon sur- vey some of the subdivisions were shown to be fractional and to con- tain a less area than contemplated by the selection, the selector may, under the saving provisions of the act of March 3, 1905, make addi- tional selection to cover such de- ficiency
Reservoir Lands.
See Arid Land; Right of Way.
The fact that a homestead entry- man holds an official position the duties of which are required to be performed at some place other than on the land embraced in his entry, constitutes no sufficient excuse for his absence from the claim, unless it be shown that his absence is actually due to his official position or employ- ment__
A homestead entryman is entitled to the exclusive possession and en- joyment of the land embraced in his entry, and where he in good faith builds a house upon the land with a view to establishing residence and complying with the law, but is pre- vented by the threats of a rival claimant from establishing residence upon the particular portion of the land selected by him for that pur- pose, it is not incumbent upon him to establish his residence upon an- other portion of the land, and he will not be held in default for failure to do so
Failure of a homestead entryman to reside upon his claim, necessitated by employment in the public service,
tions for use of name of United States in judicial proceedings to for- feit rights of way.
Circular of July 7, 1905, under act of February 7, 1905, relating to rights of way over lands segregated from Yosemite National Park and included in Sierra forest reserve ____ Regulations of September 28, 1905, relative to rights of way for canals, ditches, reservoirs, telegraph and telephone lines, etc.-
Paragraph 2 of circular of Febru ary 11, 1904, and paragraphs 3 and 66 of the circular of September 28, 1905, relating to rights of way for railroads, canals, reservoirs, etc., amended.
Paragraph 54 of the regulations of September 28, 1905, requiring that all applications for rights of way under the act of February 15, 1901, for telegraph and telephone lines, must be accompanied by an official statement of the Post Office Depart- ment showing that the applicant has complied with the regulations under title 65 of the Revised Statutes, re- voked
Directions given that all appli- cations for rights of way or other privileges over or upon public lands in forest reserves, now pending be- fore the General Land Office and falling wholly within the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture, as defined in departmental letter of June 8, 1905 (concurred in by the Secretary of Agriculture in letter of June 13, 1905), be transmitted to the Department of Agriculture for consideration and disposition___
Where applications for rights of way or other privileges affect lands lying partly within and partly with- out forest reserves, and involve questions within the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture and also questions within the jurisdiction
the land department, separate applications will not be required, but in such cases the application will be examined, and, if found regular, ap- proved by the land department in so far as it affects lands without the re- serve, and then transmitted to the Department of Agriculture for con- sideration and such action as may be proper relative to the lands with- in the reserve; but in the event it appear that the right to use lands without the reserve is subordinate to permission to use lands within the reserve, the application should first be passed upon by the Secretary of Agriculture
No rights can be initiated for the use or benefit of any railroad com- pany under the provisions of section 1 of the act of March 3, 1875, prior to the organization of such com- pany under the laws of a State or Territory
The grant of sections sixteen and thirty-six made to the Territory of New Mexico for school purposes by the act of June 21, 1898, is a grant in praesenti, and any question as to the authority of the Territory to grant rights of way for railroads across any such lands is one for de- termination by the officers of the Territory and not by the Secretary of the Interior__
The right of way granted by sec- tion 13 of the act of February 28, 1902, is a mere easement, for “depot grounds, terminals, and other rail- way purposes," and the grantee has no authority to extract oil from the grounds embraced in a right of way acquired under said act..
The act of March 3, 1901, specific- ally provides that telephone and telegraph lines constructed under its provisions shall be operated and maintained under rules and regula- tions to be prescribed by the Secre- tary of the Interior, which carries with it the power to require sworn statements from the person, com- pany, or corporation operating the lines, to the end that the annual tax be properly assessed and collected; but in the event of noncompliance with such requirement, it is not with- in the power of the Secretary, under executive authority, to close the places of business of the offending parties, any question as to the for- feiture of the right of way being a matter for determination by the
The annual tax upon telephone and telegraph lines referred to in section 3 of the act of March 3, 1901, is con- ditioned upon two things: (1) The line upon which the tax is sought to be imposed must be upon lands such as the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to subject to the terms of the act, and (2) the line must not be subject to State or Territorial taxa- tion. Where the line upon which the tax is sought to be imposed runs through any of the lands which the Secretary is authorized to subject to the terms of the act, and is not subject to State or Territorial taxa- tion, such line is under the act sub- ject to an annual tax not exceeding five dollars for each ten miles there- of constructed and maintained, re- gardless of any tax which may be levied and collected by a munici- pality through which the line runs 288 Rights of way under the provisions of section 3 of the act of March 3, 1901, are" in the nature of an ease- ment," and are property rights sub- ject to sale or transfer without the consent of the Secretary of the In- terior
The term line," as employed in section 3 of the act of March 3, 1901, means the right of way granted, and each separate line of poles is held to constitute an independent line, upon which the grantee may place as many wires as he chooses, the tax to be assessed against the property only at the rate of five dollars for each ten miles of line. In towns, where no well-defined system of parallel wires is maintained, each wire will be re- garded as covering a separate right of way, and, if otherwise within the terms of the act, is subject to tax- ation as such__
The approval by the Secretary of the Interior of the plats of incor- porated cities and towns in the In- dian Territory operates as a dedica- tion of the streets and alleys thereof to public use, and thereafter, the In- dians no longer having any interest in the ground embraced in such streets and alleys, the Secretary of the Interior has no authority to sub- ject them to the terms of section 3 of the act of March 3, 1901, author- izing him, among other things, to grant rights of way for the construc- tion of telephone and telegraph lines within and through incorporated cities and towns in the Indian Ter- ritory
Upon the admission of a State into the Union it acquires in its sovereign capacity the right to all the soil under navigable rivers, subject to the power of Congress to regulate com- merce among the States and with for- eign nations, and all lands that may afterward form upon the beds of such streams become the property of the sovereign State, or of the pro- prietor of the shore lands, in virtue of his riparian right, according to the law of the State in which the land is situated
Sections sixteen, thirty-six, thir- teen and thirty-three of the lands ceded by the Comanche, Kiowa and Apache Indians under agreement
ratified by the act of June 6, 1900, reserved for school and other pur- poses, are not subject to the opera- tion of the mining laws__.
The grant of sections sixteen and thirty-six made to the Territory of New Mexico for school purposes by the act of June 21, 1898, is a grant in praesenti, and any question as to the authority of the Territory to grant rights of way for railroads across any such lands is one for de- termination by the officers of the Territory and not by the Secretary of the Interior__
The grant of sections sixteen and thirty-six made to the State of South Dakota for school purposes by the act of February 22, 1889, took effect on the admission of the State into the Union, as to lands at that date identified by the government survey, but as to such of the indicated sec- tions as had not been surveyed at the date of the admission of the State, the right of the State does not attach unless and until identified by survey, and if at the time of survey they are known to be mineral in character, they are excepted from the grant‒‒‒
The grant of sections sixteen and thirty-six, to the State of South Da- kota for school purposes, by the act of February 22, 1889, took effect on the admission of the State into the Union as to lands of the class and character subject to the grant in such of said sections as were at that date identified by the government
surveys. As to unsurveyed lands, the grant does not attach until identification by approved survey, and if at that time any of the lands embraced in such sections are known to be mineral in character they are excepted from the grant_-_. INDEMNITY.
Regulations of January 10, 1906, relative to school indemnity selec- tions
The requirement in rule 2 of the instructions of March 6, 1903, that with each list of indemnity school selections "a certificate of the proper authorities that the base lands have not been sold, encum- bered, or otherwise disposed of," shall be furnished by the State, ad- hered to‒‒‒‒
Pending the disposition of a school land indemnity selection, even though erroneously received, no other application including any portion of the land embraced in such selection
should be accepted, nor will any rights be considered as initiated by the tender of any such application__
In the adjustment of school land grants, it is within the power, and is the duty, of the land department to see that sufficient losses, or quanti- ties of land to which the State might have been entitled under its grant had they been in place and not otherwise disposed of, equal in amount to previous certifications on account of the grant, approximately, are furnished as a base for such pre- vious approvals or certifications, be- fore other approvals and certifica- tions are made on account of the grant
There is nothing in the act of March 1, 1877, relating to indemnity school land selections in the State of California, in conflict with this requirement
Where a school section is em- braced within the limits of an In- dian reservation, the State may, un- der the provisions of section 2275 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the act of February 28, 1891, waive its right thereto and select other land in lieu thereof, nothwithstand- ing such section was identified by survey prior to the establishment of the reservation
Under the grant of sections six- teen and thirty-six made to the State of South Dakota for school pur- poses by the act of February 22, 1889, the State takes no vested in-
terest or title to any particular land until it is identified by survey, and prior to such identification the grant, as to any particular tract, may be wholly defeated by settlement, the State's only remedy in such case be- ing under the indemnity provisions of said act and of the act of February 28, 1891, amending sections 2275 and 2276 of the Revised Statutes___ 657 Where the title to school sections has vested in the Territory of New Mexico under the grant made by the act of June 21, 1898, and such sec- tions are subsequently embraced within a reservation created by exec- utive order, the Territory may, under the provisions of section 2275 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the act of February 28, 1891, waive its right thereto and select other lands in lieu thereof.
The act of February 28, 1891, amending section 2275 of the Re- vised Statutes, protects all rights ac- quired by settlements made prior to survey in the field upon sections six- teen or thirty-six, reserved for school purposes, but where a town- ship is ordered surveyed on applica- tion in behalf of the State, under the act of August 18, 1894, and the lands are withdrawn for the purposes specified therein, such settlements only as were made prior to the with- drawal are protected as against the State
Where at the time of survey of a township a portion thereof was re- turned as a salt lake now dry," and no further survey of the town- ship has since been made, the State, after a lapse of more than forty years, is justified in accepting such survey as a final and complete sur- vey of the township and in proceed- ing with the adjustment of its school land grant upon the theory that the township is fractional
Where public lands of the United States are in good faith purchased from a State in the belief that the State has acquired title thereto un- der its school grant, and in faith of such purchase are held and occupied for many years, entry thereof by a third party should not be allowed without first affording the State an opportunity to make good the title purported to be conveyed by it, by assigning a proper and sufficient basis and making selection of the land under its school grant; and in case of failure on the part of the State to make the title good, the
As between rival applicants for the same land, the prior settler must maintain his prior right by continued compliance with the law. 298 No rights can be acquired by acts of settlement as against an entry- man claiming under a prior record entry, but as between subsequent claimants the prior actual settler is entitled to precedence upon the can- cellation of the entry or extinguish- ment of the record title____
The rule that settlement rights can not be acquired by the tenant or employe of another which can be set up to defeat intervening rights, is not applicable in all cases where the relation of landlord and tenant is established, and should never be extended to cases where the rela- tion of tenant was assumed merely for the purpose of protecting settle- ment rights and in furtherance of a bona fide intention on the part of a settler to assert his rights at the first opportunity --.
Settlement upon lands in advance of the hour of opening, in violation of an order of the land department prohibiting such settlement, confers no rights upon the settler as against the first legal applicant to enter the land after the hour of opening, and such settler can not, by virtue of his mere presence upon and occu- pancy of the land after the hour of opening, with the improvements made prior to that time, secure a settlement right----
Notice of a settlement claim, posted conspicuously on the land, is sufficient to protect the claim against one who subsequently makes application for a portion thereof under the timber and stone act, whether the timber-land applicant has actual notice of the settlement claim or not, provided the posted notice was of such character that it might have been seen by a reasonable exer- cise of diligence..
Notice of a settlement claim, posted on a subdivision thereof out-
side of the technical quarter-section on which the improvements are lo- cated, will protect the settler's claim to such subdivision as against the claim of one who subsequently makes application therefor under the timber and stone act----
One who fails to assert any claim to a tract of public land in the ad- verse possession of another, and re- mains silent, though knowing that the adverse occupant continues to claim, occupy, and improve the land, is estopped thereby from subse- quently asserting a prior settlement right thereto in himself, notwith- standing the tract is found upon survey to be a part of the technical quarter-section upon which his im- provements are located___.
Special Agent.
Circular of February 14, 1906, relative to manner of proceeding on special agents' reports
States and Territories.
See School Land; Swamp Land. Failure on the part of a State to publish notice of an application for the survey of lands within thirty days from the date of such applica- tion, as provided by the act of Au- gust 18, 1894, does not affect its preference right to select such lands. for the period of sixty days from the filing of the township plat of survey. conferred by the act of March 3, 1893_.
The provision in the act of March 3, 1893, according to certain States a preference right, over all persons or corporations, except prior settlers, for a period of sixty days from the filing of the township plat of survey. within which to select lands under grants made by the act of February 22, 1889, was not repealed by the provisions of the act of August 18, 1894. according a similar right of selection for a period to extend from the date of application by the State for the survey of the lands un- til the expiration of sixty days from the date of the filing of the town- ship plat, provided notice of the ap- plication for survey be published within thirty days from the date of the filing of such application______ 139 The preference right, for a period of sixty days from the filing of the township plat of survey, accorded the State (Idaho) by the act of March 3, 1893. within which to make selection of lands under grants
« ForrigeFortsett » |