 | Francis Ludlow Holt - 1816 - 340 sider
...allowed, or we shall neither have purity of taste or morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....therefore, I shall never consider as a libel, which has but shall it be said that he might have sustained an action for defamation against that great philosopher,... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - 1819 - 710 sider
...author subjects it to fair and impartial criticism. " That publication," said Lord Ellenborough, " I shall never consider as a libel, which has for its...misrepresentations of fact, to refute sophistical reasonings, to expose a vicious taste in literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality," 1... | |
 | Scotland. Jury Court, Joseph Murray - 1826 - 574 sider
...object, not to injure the reputation of any BLACKWOOD. " individual, but to correct misrepresentation " of fact, — to refute sophistical reasoning, —...— or to " censure what is hostile to morality." The case of Sir John Carre v. Hood, reported in the same work, but not noticed at the bar, is very... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - 1828 - 668 sider
...allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science....literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality." His Lordship, therefore, held it to be lawful for an author to animadvert on the conduct of a bookseller,... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1831 - 788 sider
...Kmgtit, 1 M. and M. 74, Thompson v. Shackle, 1 M. and M. 187. That publication is not a libel wbicb has for its object not to injure the reputation of...literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality. Per Lard Ellenborough, Tabart v. Tipper, 1 Campb. 352. So the editor of a newspaper may fairly and... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1832 - 660 sider
...31 1/ Soane v. Knight, 1 M. andM. 74, Thompson v. Shackle, 1 M. and M. 187. That publication is not a libel which has for its object not to injure the...literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality. Per Lord Ellenborough, Tabart v. Tipper, 1 Campb. 352. So the editor of a newspaper may fairly and... | |
 | Benjamin Lynde Oliver - 1832 - 428 sider
...as an individual, was not libellous; and the general doctrine was laid down, that no publication is a libel, which has for its object not to injure the...sophistical reasoning, to expose a vicious taste, or to censure what is hostile to morality. 1 Camp. 350, 354. It may not be amiss to bear in mind, that... | |
 | 1874 - 486 sider
...when he directed the jury, in Tabart v. Tipper (1 Camp. 351), thus : "That publication I shall not consider as a libel which has for its object, not to injure the reputation of any individual, but to ... exposo a vicious taste in literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality?" And further on,... | |
 | John Bouvier - 1843 - 752 sider
...essentially necessary to the truth of history and advancement of science. That publication therefore is not a libel which has for its object not to injure the reputation of an individual, but to correct misrepresentations of facts, to refute sophistical reasoning, to expose... | |
 | George Wingrove Cooke - 1844 - 562 sider
...— " And she fastened her door with a " There was a little maid. skewer." " essentially necessary to the truth of history and the " advancement of science. That publication, there" fore, I shall never consider as a libel which has for " its object, not to injure the reputation... | |
| |
Liberty of criticism must be allowed, or we should have neither purity of taste nor of morals. Fair discussion is essentially necessary to the truth of history and the advancement of science. That publication, therefore, I shall never consider as a libel... 
