 That the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property described in the complaint, and that the defendants unlawfully withheld the same from the plaintiff.  The Pacific Reporter - Side 2861897Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1858 - 714 sider
...the respondent. Bowman v. Eaton. By the Court, TR STRONG, J. The first count in the complaint states that the plaintiff was the owner, and entitled to the possession, of the property in question ; that the property came into the possession of the defendant ; and that he wrongfully... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1868 - 636 sider
...clearly understand on the question of vindictive damages, they would have a right to regard the fact, that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property, a fact proven in the case. This last objection applies equally to the instructions in both cases. The... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1871 - 636 sider
...Eagleton. Issues were formed, which were tried by the court. Finding for the plaintiff below, that she was the owner and entitled to the possession of the...property described in the complaint, and that the horses were of the value of two hundred and fifty dollars, the harness twenty-five dollars, and the... | |
 | California - 1872 - 892 sider
...plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the property," is not traversed by an answer which denies that the "plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property." Nor is the averment that the "defendant wrongfully took the property from plaintiff's possession, and... | |
 | 1916 - 502 sider
...defendant's favor, and in accord with the court's instructions returned a verdict finding that he Is entitled to the possession of the property described in the complaint and fixing the value, at the time of the taking by the plaintiff, at t.he sum of $1,100; this, in the far.e... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 678 sider
...TTOS the ownership of the property in question. A verdict for the plaintiff was, in effect, a finding that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property ; but there should have been a finding as to the damages sustained by the detention of it. The court... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - 1879 - 592 sider
...that Timothy G. died on or about December 17, 1867, at which time he was the owner, in the possession and entitled to the possession, of the property described in the complaint, an undivided one half of which is the subject of controversy; that during the life-time of said Timothy... | |
 | Henry Ward Wells - 1880 - 598 sider
...that this plea is proper.8 § 709. The same. Illustrations. In Indiana, where the complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the owner, and entitled to the possession of the property " which the defendant lias possession of without right, and unlawfully detained from the plaintiff,"... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1882 - 686 sider
...of certain articles of personal property. In his verified complaint, the appellant alleged that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of the property described, of the aggregate valuo of $800.65 ; that the same had not been taken for a tax assessment or fine,... | |
 | 1886 - 1338 sider
...and a sole trader, and doing business as such in the county of Deer Lodge ; that she is the owner of and entitled to the possession of the property described in the complaint, and that the defendants (appellants) unlawfully seized said property and converted the same to their own use. The appellants... | |
| |
