Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Torino, 18 novembre 1909 (Mantovani e. C. c. Rosenthal, Fleischer & Co).
Torino, 9 settembre 1913 (Vassallo c. Pattarino)...
Torino, 12 gennaio 1914 (Capelini c. Jensch)...........

597

599

599

CORTE D'APPELLO (COURTS OF appeal).

Catania, 29 dicembre 1911 (Narcisi c. Idonia)..........
Milano, 12 settembre 1906 (Ferrario c. Gilardoni)
Milano, 7 agosto 1907 (Kahn c. Levi) ......

Milano, 11 ottobre 1907 (Barbareschi c. Heimann)

600

599

600

600

Milano, 19 novembre 1907 (Van Baerle e C. c. Heiman e C.)

599

Milano, 1 febbraio 1911 (Industria Italiana dei Disinfettanti c. Brioschi)
Napoli, 2 luglio 1900 (Ferro-Cobianchi c. Algranati)

600

275

Napoli, 27 novembre 1905 (Fratelli Branca c. Fratelli Branca fu Carlo e C.)...
Parma, 21 maggio 1912 (Prati c. Garovi)

601

599

Torino, 15 maggio 1912 (Consorzio Agrario Cooperativo di Torino c. Martin
Cultivator Co.).......

598

TRIBUNALI (TRIBUNALS).

Milano, 3 luglio 1900

600

Venezia, 14 aprile 1904 (Società Salviati Jesurum C. L. c. Ditta Pauly e C.) .. 276, 598 Parma, 25 febbraio 1910 (Soc. fornai e pastai c. Finella)

275

THE NETHERLANDS.

HOOGE RAAD (SUPREME COURT).

Beslissing van 6. April 1883 (J. C. Elzer tegen P. L. de Gavere).

607

Beslissing van 29. Juni 1883 (J. C. Cornelissen tegen H. W. Reuter).

607

Beslissing van 6. Jan. 1905 (J. J. B. Ivens, jr. tegen De naamlooze venootschap
The Singer Manufacturing Co.)......................

608

LOWER COURTS.

Amsterdam, 13. Juni 1899...

608

Amsterdam, 7. Juni 1910 (Bond van Nederlandsch Grossiers in Fruit tegen A.
Bosnak)..

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Rotterdam, 11. Nov. 1909, Arbitrale Uitspraken (van Deventer tegen Maseland en N. V. Zuid-Hollandsche Glasblazerij)..

283

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Kievskii Okruzhnyi Soud, 13. marta 1895 (Otchet po delu sindikata sakharoza-
vodchikov s O. N. Baskovoi).

Petrikovskii Okruzhnyi Soud, marta 1909 (Glue Manufacturers).
Peterburgskii Kommerchereskii Soud, 1914 (Produgol)..................

SPAIN.

TRIBUNAL SUPREMO (SUPREME COURT).

Sentencia de 30 de diciembre de 1907 (Guillermo Llambras Malla).
Sentencia de 8 de julio de 1911 (Monnegrat y Naline)...
Sentencia de 24 de abril de 1909 (Lopez de Tejada Serrano).

SWITZERLAND.

SCHWEIZERISCHES BUNDESGERICHT (SWISS FEDERAL COUrt).

Urteil v. 18. Dez. 1891 (Orell Füssli c. Schweizerisches Vereinssortiment)
Arrêt du 20 mai 1893 (Ricqlès & Co. c. Bonnet & Co.) ....

288

288

288

603

603
604

612

611

Urteil v. 24. Juni 1911 (Verband nordwestschweizerische Milchgenossenschaften
gegen Birsecksche Produktions- und Konsumgenossenschaft)..........
Arrêt du 26 avril 1913 (Société des Marchands de Combustibles de La Chaux-de-
Fonds et consorts c. Coopérative des Syndicats de La Chaux-de-Fonds).....
Arrêt du 31 mai 1913 (Ostschweizerische Mühlenaktiengesellschaft)

279

612

279

CANTONAL COURTS.

Obergericht Zürich, 12 mai 1894

613

Handelsgericht Bern, 15. Dez. 1913 (Jordi-Kocher und Kons. c. Moses Bernheim).......

613

LETTERS OF TRANSMITTAL.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY,

Washington, March 15, 1915.

SIR: I transmit herewith a report of the Commissioner of Corporations on Trust Laws and Unfair Competition. This report deals principally with the legislation and judicial decisions of the United States and of the chief foreign countries with respect to industrial combinations and unfair competition.

Very respectfully,

The PRESIDENT.

WILLIAM C. REDFIELD, Secretary.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

BUREAU OF CORPORATIONS,

Washington, March 15, 1915.

SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a report on Trust Laws and Unfair Competition made to the President under your direction, and in accordance with the law creating the Bureau of Corporations. This report deals principally with the legislation and judicial decisions of the United States and of the chief foreign countries with respect to industrial combinations and unfair competition.

I desire to mention as especially contributing, under my direction, to the preparation of this report, Messrs. Francis Walker, Adrien F. Busick, Morten Q. Macdonald, E. O. Merchant, William F. Notz, and Ernest S. Bradford, of this Bureau.

Very respectfully,

To Hon. WILLIAM C. REDFIELD,

JOSEPH E. DAVIES, Commissioner of Corporations.

Secretary of Commerce.

XLIX

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

BUREAU OF CORPORATIONS,

Washington, March 15, 1915.

SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith a report on Trust Laws

and Unfair Competition.

The Bureau first directed its attention to this subject in connection with proposed legislation to supplement the antitrust laws, undertaken by the Sixty-third Congress, in order that it might be able, in so far as desired, to furnish information thereon to the legislative branch of the Government. Furthermore, in connection with the decision of Congress to establish a Federal Trade Commission and to grant to it certain functions regarding unfair methods of competition, the Bureau made a general investigation of the laws regarding such competitive methods. Much information was collected in a form adapted to the purpose in view, and it was thought that it would be useful to the general public. For this reason, therefore, and without presuming to make a dogmatic interpretation of the law, it is deemed advisable to publish this material in the present form.

Among the chief subjects discussed are Federal antitrust legislation, the judicial decisions thereunder, and the influence of such legislation on forms of business organization, the antitrust laws of the several States, the legislation of foreign countries with regard to combinations, and the laws and judicial decisions in the United States and various foreign countries with regard to unfair or unlawful competition.

EFFECT OF LEGISLATION ON BUSINESS ORGANIZATION.

A comparison of the development of antitrust legislation in the United States and its judicial interpretation with the contemporaneous development of the forms of business organization would seem to justify the conclusion that the law has been an important factor in shaping the forms of business organization. For example, while combinations to suppress competition in the form of holding companies were at one time thought by some to be lawful, and at any rate were frequently resorted to, the clear denunciation of this form of monopolistic combination in a decision by the Supreme Court in 1904 substantially put an end to the formation of combinations of

« ForrigeFortsett »