Trust Laws and Unfair CompetitionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1916 - 832 sider Compares United States and foreign laws on industrial trusts, monopolies, and unfair competition. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side v
... void for uncertainty ... Nash v . U. S ....... 25. Character of judicial proceedings under the act .. Criminal proceedings .................. . Suits in equity by the Government .. 112 113 113 113 113 113 114 114 114 115 115 116 117 117 ...
... void for uncertainty ... Nash v . U. S ....... 25. Character of judicial proceedings under the act .. Criminal proceedings .................. . Suits in equity by the Government .. 112 113 113 113 113 113 114 114 114 115 115 116 117 117 ...
Side vii
... void ....... 213 No recovery for goods , etc ... 214 Recovery of consideration .. 214 Prohibitions against dealing in or handling goods of convicted parties ..... 215 Damages ... 216 Double damages . 216 Treble damages .. 216 19. Stock ...
... void ....... 213 No recovery for goods , etc ... 214 Recovery of consideration .. 214 Prohibitions against dealing in or handling goods of convicted parties ..... 215 Damages ... 216 Double damages . 216 Treble damages .. 216 19. Stock ...
Side 3
... void as in restraint of trade appears , however , to be still in force in England , though considerably modified by recent decisions . Most of the cases on restraint of trade relate to covenants for the sale of a business and the ...
... void as in restraint of trade appears , however , to be still in force in England , though considerably modified by recent decisions . Most of the cases on restraint of trade relate to covenants for the sale of a business and the ...
Side 4
... void . That is to say , if the restraint was partial in its operation and was otherwise reasonable the contract was held to be valid : ( b ) Monopolies were defined by Lord Coke as follows : " A monopoly is an institution , or allowance ...
... void . That is to say , if the restraint was partial in its operation and was otherwise reasonable the contract was held to be valid : ( b ) Monopolies were defined by Lord Coke as follows : " A monopoly is an institution , or allowance ...
Side 5
... void . And that at common law the evils consequent upon engrossing , etc. , caused those things to be treated as coming within monopoly and sometimes to be called monopoly and the same considerations caused monopoly because of its ...
... void . And that at common law the evils consequent upon engrossing , etc. , caused those things to be treated as coming within monopoly and sometimes to be called monopoly and the same considerations caused monopoly because of its ...
Innhold
329 | |
330 | |
332 | |
334 | |
335 | |
336 | |
338 | |
346 | |
70 | |
93 | |
97 | |
122 | |
128 | |
143 | |
159 | |
173 | |
184 | |
231 | |
243 | |
246 | |
254 | |
273 | |
297 | |
298 | |
299 | |
301 | |
302 | |
303 | |
306 | |
310 | |
311 | |
313 | |
314 | |
315 | |
316 | |
317 | |
318 | |
319 | |
321 | |
322 | |
323 | |
325 | |
326 | |
327 | |
328 | |
364 | |
377 | |
395 | |
406 | |
423 | |
431 | |
462 | |
464 | |
478 | |
486 | |
492 | |
494 | |
501 | |
508 | |
510 | |
529 | |
533 | |
559 | |
567 | |
573 | |
579 | |
585 | |
595 | |
598 | |
621 | |
647 | |
653 | |
659 | |
663 | |
675 | |
686 | |
697 | |
700 | |
717 | |
724 | |
730 | |
813 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Trust Laws and Unfair Competition Joseph Edward Davies,United States. Bureau of Corporations Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1916 |
Trust Laws and Unfair Competition Joseph Edward Davies,United States. Bureau of Corporations Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1916 |
Trust Laws and Unfair Competition Joseph Edward Davies,United States. Bureau of Corporations Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1916 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action agent agreed agreement alleged American Tobacco American Tobacco Co Antitrust Act antitrust laws apply association attorney California Carolina cartel chap circuit court Civil Code Civilsachen coal commission common carrier common law competitors complainant conspiracy Constitution contract corporation court held damages dealers decision declared decree defendant employees enforce engaged enjoined Federal illegal injunction injure interest International Harvester Co interstate commerce Iowa Jersey jobbers Kansas Law Reps legislation limit manufacture ment Michigan Mississippi Missouri monopoly N. Y. Supp Nebraska North Dakota Ohio parties person plaintiff pool prevent production prohibits public policy purchase purpose railroad regulate restraint of trade restrict retail sell Sherman Act Sherman Antitrust Act sold South Carolina Standard Oil Standard Oil Co Stats statute sugar suit Supreme Court Texas thereof tion trade or commerce trust unfair competition United unlawful violation void wholesale
Populære avsnitt
Side 72 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. SEC. 8. That the word "person...
Side 141 - And no such restraining order or injunction shall prohibit any person or persons, whether singly or in concert, from terminating any relation of employment, or from ceasing to perform any work or labor, or from recommending, advising, or persuading others by peaceful means so to do...
Side 499 - ... refund or remit in any manner or by any device any portion of the rates, fares, and charges so specified, nor extend to any shipper or person any privileges or facilities in the transportation of passengers or property, except such as are specified in such tariffs: J'ronded, That wherever the word 'carrier' occurs in this Act it shall be held to mean 'common carrier.
Side 498 - ... a greater or less compensation for any service rendered, or to be rendered, in the transportation of passengers or property, subject to the provisions of this act, than it charges, demands, collects or receives from any other person or persons for doing for him or them a like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, such common carrier shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby prohibited...
Side 134 - That no corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital of another corporation engaged also in commerce, where the effect of such acquisition may be to substantially lessen competition between the corporation whose stock is so acquired and the corporation making the acquisition, or to restrain such commerce in any section or community, or tend to create a monopoly of any line of commerce.
Side 133 - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Side 140 - That any person, firm, corporation, or association shall be entitled to sue for and have injunctive relief, in any court of the United States having jurisdiction over the parties, against threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws...
Side 71 - The several circuit courts of the United States are hereby invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this Act ; and it shall be the duty of the several district attorneys of the United States, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations.
Side 498 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Side 141 - ... attending at any place where any such person or persons may lawfully be, for the purpose of peacefully obtaining or communicating information, or from peacefully persuading any person to work or to abstain from working; or from ceasing to patronize or to employ any party to such dispute, or from recommending, advising, or persuading others by peaceful and lawful means so to do...