Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

H. OF R.

City of Washington-Tennessee Lands.

man thought that he had coinmitted such an act, he invited him then to bring forward the charge. He had been told that the manner in which the affair had been stated was this: that the disclosure was made in a letter which he had written to one of his constituents in North Carolina; and that the imputation rested on a letter in the hands of his colleague (Mr. HENDERSON.) That letter could be produced; and if any gentleman gave credit to the charge, he wished it to be produced immediately, that he might not go home under any such imputation. He had not indeed expected that any such imputation, founded on a disposition to disclose the confidential proceedings of the House, would have been laid to one of the majority. He did suppose if there should be any disclosure, it would come from another quarter. He however, solicited any gentleman to bring forward the charge who professed to believe it. This was a debt of justice due to him and to the House: and if were not done, he would not consider the gentleman who had made it as believing it himself. Mr. GRISWOLD said it ought to be known to the House, that the colleague of the gentleman (Mr. HENDERSON) had been and still was confined by sickness. He regretted under those circumstances that the gentleman had not waited until his colleague attended in his place.

Mr. HOLLAND said he meant not to cast any imputation on his colleague; he had not subjected himself to the least obloquy. If he was in possession of the letter it was in the power of gentlemen to obtain it.

CITY OF WASHINGTON.

Mr. RANDOLPH, from the Committee of Ways and Means, reported a bill concerning the City of Washington, which was referred to a Committee

of the Whole.

The bill allows an annual salary of $1,200 to the superintendent, three dollars per day to the surveyor, and provides for clerk-hire and contingent expenses in these offices.

Mr. RANDOLPH Suggested to the gentleman from New York the propriety of introducing into this bill such provisions as he thought proper, and had some time since alluded to, respecting the neces sary repairs to the public buildings.

Mr. MITCHILL made a few remarks on the necessity of making provision for the accommodation of the next Congress, in consequence of its augmented numbers, and for repairing several parts of the buildings now in a state of ruin and dilapidation; and conluded by saying he would prepare a new section to that effect.

Mr. DAWSON said he had prepared a new section of this nature, which he offered to the Chair, appropriating dollars, to be applied under the direction of the President to the repair of the Capitol, for the future accommodation of Congress.

On the suggestion of Mr. ALSTON, the motion was varied so as to embrace the public buildings generally.

Mr. MERIWETHER thought the Committee were acting without proper information.

FEBRUARY, 1803.

Mr. DAWSON observed that an estimate had been made.

Mr. BACON inquired what sum it was contemplated to appropriate.

Mr. BRENT said an estimate had been made by an eminent architect of the sum that would be required for putting the part of the Capitol, in which the House sat, in such a situation as to accommodate them. The estimate, he understood, was $40,000.

Mr. MORRIS asked if it was not intended to repair the other parts of the Capitol and the President's House, the roofs of which were, he understood, so leaky as to threaten both edifices with ruin? Mr. DAWSON's motion was then agreed toayes 42.

Mr. BRENT moved to fill the blank with $50,000. Carried-ayes 40.

On motion of Mr. EUSTIS the above appropriation was made to embrace the keeping in repair of the highway between the Capitol and the President's House.

The Committee then rose and reported the bill with amendments; to which the House agreed, and ordered the bill to be engrossed for a third reading today.

TENNESSEE LANDS.

The House went into a Committee of the Whole on the bill for settling sundry claims to public lands of the United States south of the State of Tennessee.

The bill consists of eleven sections; the first three of which follow:

"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That every grant, deed, conveyance,

or other written evidence of any claim or claims to any of the lands lying to the north of the thirty-first degree of north latitude, south of the State of Tennessee, east of the river Mississippi, and west of the western boundary of the State of Georgia, as the said boundary is described by the articles of agreement and cession between the United States and that State, derived, or pretended to be derived, from an act of the State of Georgia, passed on the seventh day of January, 1795, entitled "An act supplementary to an act for appropriating a part of the unlocated territory of this State, for the payment of the State troops, and for other purposes therein mentioned, and declaring the right of this State to the unappropriated territory thereof, for the protection and support of the frontiers of this State, and for other purposes therein mentioned," shall be exhibited to the Secretary of State within twelve months after the passing of this act, and there recorded in a book or books to be kept for that purpose, at the expense of the party exhibiting the same, who shall pay to the person employed by the Secretary of State for recording the same, words contained in each document thus recorded; nor at the rate of twelve and a half cents for every hundred shall any grant, deed, conveyance, or other written evidence of any claim derived, or pretended to be derived, from the said act of the State of Georgia, unless it shall have been exhibited and recorded in the manner and within the time above specified, ever after be admitted or considered as evidence in any of the courts of the

MARCH, 1803.

Tennessee Lands.

H. OF R.

United States, against any other grant from the State this act contained shall be construed to recognise, imof Georgia, or from the United States.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That so much of the five millions of acres reserved by the articles of agreement and cession between the United States and the State of Georgia, as shall not, during the present session of Congress, have been appropriated for satisfying claims other than those described in the preceding section, to any of the lands above mentioned, or so much of the net proceedings thereof as may be necessary for that purpose, shall be, and the same is hereby, appropriated for the purpose of indemnifying for, and extinguishing the claims or pretended claims to any of the lands above mentioned, which are derived, or pretended to be derived, from the above mentioned act of the State of Georgia.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That the several companies, or persons claiming under them, designated in the said act of the State of Georgia, by the names of "Georgia Company," "Georgia Mississippi Company," | "Tennessee Company," and "Upper Mississippi Company," shall, upon making such a release of the whole of their respective claim or claims, in favor of the United States, as shall be approved of by the Attorney General for the time being, be entitled to receive grants for the amount of land appropriated by the next preceding section of this act: Provided, however, That the same grant shall be located with the approbation of the Secretary of the Treasury for the time being, on lands to which the Indian title has not yet been extinguished, in no more than six tracts; that is to say, three tracts for the persons claiming under the Georgia Company, and one tract for each of the other companies, or the persons claiming under them respectively, each of which tracts shall extend the whole length or breadth of the territory claimed by the respective companies, and shall not have a greater proportionate tract on the rivers than the territory thus claimed.

Mr. HUGER moved an amendment, the object of which was to place the South Carolina Yazoo Company on the same footing with the other

claimants.

This motion was supported by Messrs. HUGER and BAYARD, and opposed by Messrs. NICHOLSON and MERIWETHER; and was lost-ayes 18. Mr. MERIWETHER then moved a new section in lieu of the third section; directing the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Attorney General, to receive such propositions as may be made by the claimants, and to make report at the next session of Congress.

Mr. NICHOLSON supported this motion.

Mr. EUSTIS moved an amendment authorizing the commissioners to make a final settlement of the claims.

Mr. NICHOLSON opposed the amendment. Mr. GREGG was opposed not only to the amendment but to the bill itself.

Mr. MERIWETHER spoke against the amendment. Mr. EUSTIS's amendment was lost without a division.

The new section offered by Mr. MERIWETHER was then adopted-ayes 42.

Mr. MERIWETHER moved to strike out all the remaining sections, except the eleventh, which is as follows:

SEC. 11. And be it further enacted, That nothing in 7th CoN. 2d SES.-20

pair, or affect the claims of any person or persons to any of the lands above mentioned.

Carried without a division.

The Committee rose, and the House immediately concurred in their amendments.

made in Committee, on which a debate ensued in which Messrs. HUGER and BAYARD supported, and Messrs. NICHOLSON and MERIWETHER opposed it. Mr. DAVIS moved the recommitment of the bill to the Committee of the Whole.

Mr. HUGER renewed the motion which he had

Mr. NICHOLSON opposed the motion; which was lost-ayes 15.

The question was then taken on Mr. HUGER'S amendment, and decided in the affirmative-ayes 36-noes 21.

The bill was then ordered to be engrossed for a third reading to-day-ayes 49.

TUESDAY, March 1.

A message from the Senate informed the House that the Senate have passed a bill, entitled "An act directing a detachment from the militia of the United States, and for erecting certain arsenals;" to which they desire the concurrence of this House. The Senate have also passsd the bill, entitled "An act for the relief of insolvent debtors within the District of Columbia," with several amendments; to which they desire the concurrence of this House.

ington was read the third time and passed. An engrossed bill concerning the City of Wash

ments proposed by the Senate to the bill, entitled The House proceeded to consider the amend

"An act for the relief of insolvent debtors within the District of Columbia:" Whereupon,

Ordered, That the said amendments, together with the bill, be committed to Mr. NICHOLSON, Mr. TALIAFERRO, and Mr. HUNT.

The following Message was received from the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Gentlemen of the House of Representatives: December 20th, I communicated to you such returns According to the request stated in your resolution of of the militia of the different States as had then been received. Since that date, returns have been received from New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, North Carolina, Georgia, and Kentucky, which are now transmitted to you. THOS. JEFFERSON.

MARCH 1, 1803.

The said Message was read, and, together with the statement transmitted therewith, ordered to lie on the table.

The SPEAKER laid before the House a letter from the Secretary of the Treasury, accompanying his report on the state of the direct tax, together with a letter to him, from the Commissioner of the Revenue, relative thereto, in pursuance of a resolution of this House of the 24th of January last; which were read, and ordered to lie on the table.

The House resolved itself into a Committee of the whole House on the bill to allow a drawback of duty on sugar refined within the United States;

H. OF R.

The Mint-Danish Brig Henrick.

and, after some time spent therein, the Committee reported the bill with several amendments thereto; which were severally twice read, and agreed to by the House.

Ordered, That the said bill, with the amendments, be engrossed, and read the third time

to-morrow.

The House proceeded to the farther consideration of an engrossed bill for settling sundry claims to public lands of the United States south of the State of Tennessee, which was yesterday read the third time: Whereupon, the question being taken that the said bill do pass, it was resolved in the affirmative-yeas 58, nays 12, as follows:

YEAS-Willis Alston, John Archer, John Bacon, Theodorus Bailey, James A. Bayard, Phanuel Bishop, Walter Bowie, Richard Brent, Robert Brown, William Butler, Thomas Claiborne, John Clopton, John Condit, Manasseh Cutler, John Davenport, John Dawson, William Dickson, Lucas Elmendorf, Ebenezer Elmer, William Eustis, Calvin Goddard, Edwin Gray, John A. Hanna, Seth Hastings, William Helms, Benjamin Huger, Samuel Hunt, David Meriwether, Samuel Mitchill, Thomas Morris, James Mott, Anthony New, Thomas Newton, jun., Joseph H. Nicholson, Thomas Plater, Nathan Read, William Shepard, John Smilie, Israel Smith, John Cotton Smith, John Smith, of New York, Josiah Smith, Samuel Smith, Henry Southard, Joseph Stanton, John Stewart, Samuel Tenney, David Thomas, Thomas Tillinghast, Philip R. Thompson, John Trigg, George B. Upham, Philip Van Cortlandt, Isaac Van Horne, Peleg Wadsworth, Richard Winn, Henry Woods, and Thomas Wynns.

NAYS-Thomas Boude, Samuel J. Cabell, Andrew Gregg, William Barry Grove, Joseph Heister, William Hoge, David Holmes, Michael Leib, John Randolph, jr., John Smith, of Virginia, Richard Stanford, and John Taliaferro, jun.

THE MINT.

The House went into a Committee of the Whole on the bill to prolong the continuance of the Mint at Philadelphia.

The bill provides for the continuance of the Mint for five years, and appropriates $500 beyond the usual appropriation for the establishment.

The appropriation was, on motion of Mr. VARNUM, struck out, without a division. The Committee then reported the bill.

The House concurred in the report.

Mr. ALSTON observed that if it were not so late

in the session he would move to strike out the

first section, by which the Mint would be abolished; but as it was too late to take this step, with any probability of success, he should content himself with moving to strike out five, and insert one, by which the institution would be continued for one year only.

Lost-ayes 25, nays 31.

The bill was then ordered to be engrossed for a third reading.

DANISH BRIG HENRICK.

An engrossed bill to enable the President to make restitution to the owners of the Danish brig Henrick, was read a third time.

Messrs. DAWSON, J. C. SMITH, GREGG, and S. SMITH, spoke in favor of, and Messrs. BAYARD,

MARCH, 1803.

HASTINGS, GRISWOLD, BACON, DANA, and GODDARD, against the bill.

Mr. LEIB moved a postponement of the bill to the first Monday in December.

On which motion the yeas and nays were taken, and were-yeas 39, nays 39. The SPEAKER declared himself against the postponement.

The question was then taken by yeas and nays on the passage of the bill, and carried-yeas 41, nays 38, as follows:

YEAS-Willis Alston, John Archer, Theodorus Bailey, Walter Bowie, Richard Brent, Samuel J. Cabell, John Campbell, Thomas Claiborne, Matthew Clay, John Clopton, Richard Cutts, John Dawson, Peter Early, Lucas Elmendorf, Ebenezer Elmer, Andrew Gregg, John A. Hanna, Daniel Heister, David Holmes, George Jackson, David Meriwether, Samuel L. Mitchill, Anthony New, Thomas Newton, jr., Joseph H. Nicholson, John Randolph, jun., John Smilie, Israel Smith, John Cotton Smith, John Smith, of New York, Samuel Smith, Richard Stanford, John Taliaferro, jun., David Thomas, Philip R. Thompson, Abram Trigg, George B. Upham Philip Van Cortlandt, Isaac Van Horne, Henry Woods, and Thomas Wynns.

NAYS-John Bacon, James A. Bayard, Phanuel Bishop, Thomas Boude, Robert Brown, William Butler, John Condit, Manasseh Cutler, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, Thomas T. Davis, William Dickson, William Eustis, Calvin Goddard, Edwin Gray, Roger Griswold, William Barry Grove, Seth Hastings, Joseph Heister, William Hoge, Benjamin Huger, Michael Leib, Thomas Morris, James Mott, Thomas Plater, Nathan Read, William Shepard, John Smith, of Virginia, Josiah Smith, Henry Southard, Joseph Stanton, John Trigg, Joseph B. Varnum, Peleg Wadsworth, John Stewart, Samuel Tenney, Thomas Tillinghast,

and Richard Winn.

The House adjourned until five o'clock, post meridian.

FIVE O'CLOCK, P. M.

An engrossed bill to prolong the continuance of the Mint at Philadelphia was read the third time, and passed.

The bill sent from the Senate, entitled "An act United States, and for erecting certain arsenals," directing a detachment from the militia of the was read twice, and committed to a Committee of the whole House to-morrow.

that the Senate have passed the bill, entitled “An A message from the Senate, informed the House disabled by known wounds received in the actual act to make provision for persons that have been service of the United States during the Revolutionary war," with several amendments; to which they desire the concurrence of this House."

The House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the bill sent from the Senate, entitled "An act to alter the time for the next meeting of Congress." The Committee reported the bill without amendment.

A motion was then made, and the question being put, that the farther consideration thereof be postponed until to-morrow, it passed in the negative. And then the main question being taken that said bill do pass, it was resolved in the affirmative-yeas 42, nays 30, as follows:

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

YEAS-John Archer, Theodorus Bailey, Walter Bowie, Richard Brent, Robert Brown, William Butler, Samuel J. Cabell, Thomas Claiborne, Matthew Clay, John Clopton, Manasseh Cutler, Thomas T. Davis, John Dawson, William Dickson, Peter Early, Lucas Elmendorf, John A. Hanna, Joseph Heister, David Holmes, George Jackson, Michael Leib, David Meriwether, Samuel L. Mitchill, Thomas Moore, Anthony New, Thomas Newton, jun., Joseph H. Nicholson, John Randolph, jun., John Smilie, John Smith, of New York, John Smith, of Virginia, Samuel Smith, Richard Stanford, Joseph Stanton, John Stewart, John Taliaferro, jun., David Thomas, John Trigg, Philip Van Cortlandt, Isaac Van Horne, Peleg Wadsworth, and Thomas Wynns.

NAYS-Willis Alston, John Bacon, James A. Bayard, Phanuel Bishop, Thomas Boude, John Campbell, John Condit, Samuel W. Dana, John Davenport, Ebenezer Elmer, William Eustis, Calvin Goddard, Edwin Gray, Andrew Gregg, Roger Griswold, William Barry Grove, Seth Hastings, William Helms, William Hoge, Benjamin Huger, Samuel Hunt, Thos. Morris, James Mott, Thomas Plater, Nathan Read, John Cotton Smith, Josiah Smith, Samuel Tenney, Samuel Thatcher, and Joseph B. Varnum.

WEDNESDAY, March 2.

An engrossed bill to allow a drawback of duty on sugar refined within the United States was read a third time and passed-yeas 36, nays 29. The bill was supported by Messrs. MITCHILL, and S. SMITH; and opposed by Mr. MOTT.

Mr. NICHOLSON, from the committee to whom were referred the amendments of the Senate to an act for the relief of insolvent debtors within the District of Columbia, reported their agreement thereto; in which report the House concurred.

SINKING FUND.

H. of R.

Mr. GRISWOLD rose, and addressed the Chair as follows:

which I attempted yesterday to submit to the Mr. Speaker: I hold in my hand a resolution consideration of the House, but was then prevented by a preference which it was thought proper to give to other business. To this resolution I beg leave, at this time, to call your attention, and I trust the importance of the subject which it involves, will induce gentlemen to give it a consideration. As I mentioned yesterday, the resolution proposes an investigation of the report of the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund, who received, in the course of the last year, more than ten millions of the public money to be applied to the discharge of the principal and interest of the public debt, but whose accounts have been rendered with so much uncertainty as to leave it doubtful whether the money has been applied or the law regarded. For the purpose of ascertaining whether this has been done, I propose to instruct the Committee of Ways and Means to examine the report of the Commissioners, and to report to the House; and although I regret that so short a time will be allowed for examination, yet, when it is recollected that the report has already been several weeks before that committee, and no apparent progress has been made by them, I trust it will not be thought extraordinary, that I should endeavor, even at this late period of the session, to stimulate their investigation by new instructions.

Mr. RANDOLPH, from the committee to whom was referred a letter from William Henry HarriIt may be proper further to observe, that the son, President of the Convention held at Vincen-chairman of the Committee of Ways and Means nes, in the Indiana Territory, relative to the suspen- (Mr. RANDOLPH) has been long apprized of the sion of the sixth article of compact between the objections which have been made to the report United States and the people of that Territory, of the Commissioners. and, probably, has long (which prohibits slavery); also, a memorial and since consulted with the acting officer of the petition of the inhabitants of the Territory; made board, and will be prepared to make a report. à report, which was referred to a Committee of The Journals of the House will show that the the Whole, and ordered to be printed. Commissioners made their report on the seventh day of February, and it will be recollected that as soon as it was printed and laid on our tables, upon a motion which I had the honor, at that time, of submitting, the House referred the report to the Committee of Ways and Means; and the chairman of that committee will recollect that, on the same or the succeeding day, I stated to him the objections which appeared against the report. Under these circumstances, we may expect a report from the committee before the close of the A motion was made to postpone the considera-session; but, even if this should not take place, it tion of the bill to the first Monday of November, may be useful to call the particular attention of which was supported by Mr. JOHN C. SMITH, and the members of the House to a subject which can opposed by Mr. HELMS. Lost-yeas 24, nays 38. be fully elucidated by calculations in the closet, Mr. GRISWOLD moved the reference of the and gentlemen will then be induced, at their leisamendments to a select committee. Carried-yeasure, to make the investigation for themselves. 35, nays 23; and referred to Messrs. HELMS, GRISWOLD, and EUSTIS.

The House took into consideration the amendments of the Senate to the act to make provision for persons that have been disabled by known wounds received in the late service of the United States, during the Revolutionary war.

A message from the Senate informed the House that the Senate have passed the bill, entitled "An act in addition to an act, entitled 'An act to amend the Judicial System of the United States," with an amendment; to which they desire the concurrence of this House.

But, before I read the resolution in my place or offer it to the House, I will take the liberty of explaining the objects to which I think the attention of the committee ought to be particularly directed, and will point out some of the objections which arise, to the proceedings of the Commissioners and to their accounts.

The provisions of the law of the last session,

H. OF R.

Sinking Fund.

MARCH, 1803.

composed any part of the fund of seven millions three hundred thousand dollars, but, on the contrary, have not only sold the bank shares and applied the proceeds to pay the bank, but have, in addition, claimed and received from the Treasury the whole sum of seven millions three hundred thousand dollars, under the law of the last session, and without applying it, as has been already stated.

entitled "An act to provide for the redemption of the whole public debt," cannot, I presume, be forgotten by the House. On this law it is necessary only to observe, that the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund were authorized to receive, in each year, from the revenue from impost and tonnage, a sum which, when added to the receipts from certain branches of the Sinking Fund, should form an aggregate of $7,300,000; and it was made the duty of the Commissioners to apply this It can scarcely be necessary to observe, that the sum "yearly and every year," to the payment of remittances which may have been made to Holthe principal and interest of the public debt. The land to meet the instalments of the Dutch debt duty of the Commissioners has not only been thus for the current year, cannot be considered as a clearly defined, but it is fresh in the recollection payment of debt in the year 1802, or as a legal of every member of the House, that, in the dis- application of any part of the fund of seven milcussion which took place on this floor upon the lions three hundred thousand dollars, for the year passage of the law in question, it was confidently 1802. For, as the law requires that the payment asserted that the Commissioners would faithfully of seven millions three hundred thousand dollars and literally execute the law, and that we might shall be made in each year, a provision to meet be assured that they would apply, in each year, an instalment falling due in a subsequent year, the fund of $7,300,000 to the principal and inter- can be no payment within the year; and, as the est of the debt. An examination of the report of fund of seven millions three hundred thousand the Commissioners will show how far these prom-dollars was actually received for the year 1802, ises have been executed. it was clearly their duty to apply it within the year.

By the report, it appears that the Commissioners received, in the year 1802, the appropriation for that year, amounting, as already observed,

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

$7,300,000 00

[ocr errors]

1,344,000 00

[blocks in formation]

Leaving a balance in their hands unapplied and unaccounted for, of

769,992 16

There are other parts of the report which require investigation, and to some of which I request the attention of the House. It will be found in page six of the report, that the Commissioners have charged $4,065,738 47, as a payment for the interest which accrued on the whole debt, for the year 1802. This charge may be correct, but it does not agree with the Treasury accounts, and there must be an error somewhere.

In the last annual report of the Secretary of the Trea-
sury, the interest of the domestic debt, is stated to
be
$3,470,250 75

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

By comparing this aggregate with the charge of the Commissioners, it will be found, that their account of interest exceeds the Treasury account $148,547 79. It appeared to me probable, that I must be permitted again to repeat, that it was the Secretary had made the mistake in stating made expressly the duty of the Commissioners to the interest upon the domestic debt, and had, perapply, within the year, this fund of seven mil-haps, omitted to charge the interest upon the debt lions three hundred thousand dollars to the interest and principal of the debt, and to observe that it has not been done, if credit is to be given to their own report; and I hope the committee will, in their report, inform the House why the law has not been executed.

due to the bank, which, as appears by the report of the Commissioners, amounted to $162,025. But when this sum is added to the aggregate of the Treasury account cf interest, it will be found that the result exceeds the Commissioners' account by $43,477 28, so that this conjecture canIf it should be imagined by any gentleman pres-not explain the difficulty. The confusion and ent, that the payment made to the bank, from uncertainty which appears in the different acthe sales of bank shares, may be considered as a counts which relate to the interest of the debt is payment from the fund of seven millions three the more unfortunate, because we are not only hundred thousand dollars, it will only be neces- prevented from knowing what the true amount sary for those gentlemen, if any such there be, to of interest on each description of debt is, but are turn to the law, and to the report of the Commis-left in a state of uncertainty in relation to the agsioners; and they will be satisfied that the law gregate of interest; and, of course, cannot say whecould not warrant the Commissioners, nor have ther the Commissioners have charged too much they claimed that the proceeds of those sales or too little. The importance of receiving correct

« ForrigeFortsett »