Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

CHAP. "mitted in any other cause, or any other court,

XII.

1723.

66

nor allowed, I verily believe, to condemn a Jew "in the Inquisition of Spain or Portugal ?"

He thus concludes: "If, after all, it shall still "be thought by your Lordships that there is any "seeming strength in the proofs produced against "me; if by private persuasions of my guilt, "founded on unseen, unknown motives; if for

66

any reasons or necessities of state, of which I "am no competent judge, your Lordships shall be "induced to proceed on this bill, God's will be "done! Naked came I out of my mother's womb, "and naked shall I return; and whether He gives or takes away, blessed be the name of the "Lord!"

66

The Bishop having ended this most eloquent and affecting defence, and one of the counsel for the bill having replied, the Lords took their debate on the question, That this Bill do pass. The ablest speeches on the Bishop's side were the Duke of Wharton's and Lord Cowper's; the latter not merely maintaining Atterbury's innocence, but inveighing against any parliamentary deprivation of a Bishop. "The "old champions of our Church," said he, "used to "argue very learnedly that to make or to degrade

[ocr errors]

Bishops was not the business of the state; that "there is a spiritual relation between the Bishop

"This speech," says Dr. King, "was heard with universal "admiration, and was, indeed, not unworthy of the oldest sena

tor, or the most able and eloquent lawyer." (Anecdotes of his own Times, p. 35.)

[ocr errors]

"and his flock, derived from the church, with CHAP. "which the state has nothing to do. What the

66

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

thoughts of our reverend prelates are upon these 'points does not yet fully appear; something of "their conduct intimates as if our old divines were mistaken." In fact, most of the Bishops were now taking a forward and eager part against their brother; and one of them, (Wynne, of St. Asaph,) very little to his honour, even went so far as to volunteer evidence, which, when close pressed, he was not able to maintain. Their hostility provoked a bitter sarcasm from Lord Bathurst. Turning to their bench, he exclaimed, that he could hardly account for the inveterate malice some persons bore the learned and ingenious Bishop of Rochester, unless they were possessed with the infatuation of the wild Indians, who fondly believe they inherit not only the spoils, but even the abilities, of any great enemy they kill!

On a division, 43 Peers voted against the bill, but 83 for it; and it received the Royal Assent on the 27th of the same month.

On the whole of this transaction we may, undoubtedly, condemn the vindictive severity which oppressed Atterbury in the Tower *, and which de

*Coxe endeavours to palliate this severity, and alleges a case where, by the connivance of the Government, Atterbury received some money from a lease of the Chapter of Westminster. But here seems some error. He quotes a document of the Chapter, dated May 31. 1723, and speaking of Atterbury as the "present

XII.

1723.

XII.

1723.

CHAP. nounced any correspondence with him when abroad'; but we can scarcely consider the main clauses of the bill as otherwise than moderate. The crime Atterbury had committed was no less than high treason; and had the Ministers been men of blood, there might, I think, have been evidence sufficient (I am sure that there were voters ready) to bring him to the scaffold. His punishment was, therefore, a mitigation of that which our law imposes: nor should our admiration of genius ever betray us into an apology of guilt. But the great reproach to which his punishment is liable is as setting aside those ordinary forms, and those precious safeguards, which the law of treason enjoins a vio lence of which the danger is not felt, only because the precedent has, happily, not been followed.

Atterbury received the news of his fate with fortitude and composure; in fact, he had foreseen it as inevitable. He took an affecting leave of his friends, who were now permitted to see him, especially of Pope. At their last interview Atterbury presented him with a Bible as his keepsake. Perhaps," says Pope, with much feeling, "it is "not only in this world that I may have cause to "remember the Bishop of Rochester." * Next

"Dean." But would he be so styled at that time, the bill for his deprivation having received the Royal Assent four days before? Memoirs of Walpole, vol. i. p. 171.

See Johnson's Life of Pope. This gift of a Bible has given rise to a most calumnious story of something which Dr. Maty said, that Lord Chesterfield said, that Pope said, that the Bishop said! Excellent evidence to accuse of deism one of our greatest

XII.

1723.

day, the 18th of June, the Bishop was embarked on CHAP. board a man-of-war, without any of the tumults which the Ministers feared on that occasion; and conveyed to Calais. As he went on shore he was told that Lord Bolingbroke, having received the King's pardon, was just arrived at the same place, on his return to England. "Then I am exchanged!" said Atterbury with a smile. Surely," exclaims their friend at Twickenham, this nation is afraid of being over-run with too "much politeness, and cannot regain one great "genius but at the expense of another!"*

66

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The pardon which Bolingbroke now obtained had been for a long time pending. When he was dismissed by the Pretender, in 1716, and renounced that party for ever, he found, as he says, Lord Stair instructed, from England, to treat with him. A negotiation was accordingly opened, Bolingbroke declaring that he would never reveal any secret, nor betray any friend; but that he was ready, in future, to serve his King and country with zeal and affection; and that he never did any thing by halves. It was then that Bolingbroke took the measure of writing a private letter to Sir William Wyndham, pointing out the weakness of the Pretender's character, and the

theological writers! See this story and some decisive evidence against it quoted in the Encyclop. Brit. art. ATTERBURY. It seems quite out of place in " Pope's Character by Lord Chester"field;" and was, I have no doubt, a fabrication surreptitiously inserted.

* Pope to Swift, 1723.

1723.

CHAP, small hopes of his cause, and urging his friend to XII. turn his thoughts elsewhere; which letter Bolingbroke sent, unsealed, to the Postmaster-General, to be laid before the Government, and to be forwarded or not, as they thought proper.* In thus acting Bolingbroke did no injury to his friend, who was already more than suspected of Jacobite principles, and who was not at all legally endangered by receiving such advice, while the adviser served himself by this decided and acceptable token of his new-born zeal for the House of Hanover.

It was certain, as Lord Stair truly observed, that there was no man who could do so much inThe Ministers, there

jury to the Jacobite cause.
fore, were anxious to secure himt, and he had a
zealous advocate in the Duchess of Kendal, to
whom his purse was full of irresistible arguments.
The animosity of the Whig party in general was,
however, at that time, so strong as to form an
almost insuperable bar to his return; and a rumour
of it, in 1719, was artfully turned by Walpole into
a political weapon. In his pamphlet on the Peer-
age Bill, speaking of Lord Oxford, he remarks,
with indignation, that "his rival in guilt and

[ocr errors][merged small]

This letter is dated Sept. 13. 1716; and printed in Coxe's Walpole, vol. ii. p. 308., together with one from Townshend to Stanhope on the subject. The original was duly forwarded to Wyndham.

+ See his letter to Lord Stanhope, November 9. 1717. Appendix, vol. i., and the Hardwicke State Papers, vol. ii. p. 558.

« ForrigeFortsett »