...protected by the First Amendment. See New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 US 254, 270 (1964). That the "Constitution does not require all public acts...done in town meeting or an assembly of the whole," Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 239 US 441, 445 (1915). does not mean that...

...as to any further notice, was that it was hard to believe that the proposition was seriously made. Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption. The Constitution does not require all public acts...

...attempt to determine whether it might or might not have thrown out the suit upon the preliminary ground. Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few...every one should have a direct voice in its adoption; nor does the Federal Constitution require all public acts to lx> done in town meeting or in an assembly...

...by reason of the fact that the times of meeting of the board were fixed by law. The court said that, where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption; and that there must be a limit to individual arguments...

...by reason of the fact that the times of meeting of the board were fixed by law. The court said that, where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption ; and that there must be a limit to individual...

...Chicago & NWR Co. v. State, 128 Wis. 553, 054, 108 NW 557. We deduce from the foregoing the following : Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it Is Impracticable to give every one affected a voice In Its adoption, and It Is doubtful that any opportunity for a hearing...

...accepted for a long time " (Otis Company vs. Ludlow Mfg. Co., 201 US, 140). tax law went into effect: " Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption. The Constitution does not require all public acts...

...accepted for a long time " (Otis Companv vs. Ludlow Mfg. Co., 201 US, 140). tax law went into effect : " Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people, it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption. The Constitution does not require all public acts...

...hearings violate established concepts of procedural due process. It is well-settled that it does not. Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people it is impracticable that every person affected should have a direct voice in its adoption. Individual argument in these proceedings...

...Bi-Metallic Co. v. Colorado, 239 US 441 (191 5),- the Supreme Court, Justice Holmes observed that: Where a rule of conduct applies to more than a few people it is impracticable that everyone should have a direct voice in its adoption. * * * There must be a limit to individual argument...