 | United States. Supreme Court - 1845 - 852 sider
...postmaster-general ta disallow such items of credit ;" and to this'instruction this court answer : " The successor of Mr. Barry had the same power, and...allowances made by Mr. Barry, if he acted within the scope of official authority given by law to the head of the department. This right in an incumbent... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate - 1852 - 920 sider
...General was not legally authorized to allow, then it was the L: duty of the present Postmaster General to disallow such items of credit. The successor of Mr. Barry had the same power, and no more than the predecessor ; and the power did not extend to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barry,... | |
 | Charles Gratiot - 1852 - 84 sider
...Tyler, dated October 18, 1841, and an order of Mr. Tyler thereon." of the present Postmaster-General to disallow such items of credit. The successor of Mr. Barry had the same power, and no more, than the predecessor ; and the power did not extend to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barry,... | |
 | 1852 - 814 sider
...instruction, and held that the power of the successor was no greater than that of his predecessor, and " did not extend to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barry, if he acted within the scope of official authority given by law to the head of a department ;' , and that the "right in an... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1856 - 858 sider
...General was not legally authorized to allow, then it was the duty of the present Postmaster General to disallow such items of credit. The successor of...allowances made by Mr. Barry, if he acted within the scope of official authority given by law to the head of the department. This right of an incumbent... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - 1864 - 696 sider
...postmaster-general was not legally authorized to allow, then it was the duty of the present postmaster-general to disallow such items of credit. The successor of...no more, than his predecessor, and the power of the United States v. Bank of the Metropolis. 15 P. [ * 401 ] former did not extend to * the recall of credits... | |
 | United States. Congress - 1872 - 912 sider
...General was not legally authorized to allow, then it was the duty of the present Postmaster General to disallow such items of credit. The successor of Mr. Barry had the sumo power, and no more, than his predecessor, and the power of the former did not extend to the recall... | |
 | United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1883 - 906 sider
...authority to disallow credits in favor of a contractor, which had been allowed by his predecessor, that — "The successor of Mr. Barry had the same, power, and...allowances made by Mr. Barry, if he acted within the scope of official authority given by law to the head of the Department. This right in an incumbent... | |
 | United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1883 - 908 sider
...authority to disallow credits in favor of a contractor, which had been allowed by his predecessor, that — "The successor of Mr. Barry had the same power, and...to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barrj*, if he acted within the scope of official authority given by law to the head of the Department.... | |
 | 1897 - 1036 sider
...general was not legally authorized to allow, then it was the duty of the present postmaster general to disallow such items of credit. The successor of...his predecessor; and the power of the former did not «xtend to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barry, If he acted within the scope of official... | |
| |
General to disallow such items of credit. The successor of Mr. Barry had the same power, and no more, than his predecessor, and the power of the former did not extend to the recall of credits or allowances made by Mr. Barry, if he acted within the scope... 
