It is agreed between the sender of the following message and this company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery, of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence of... United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court - Side 448av United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1888Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1883 - 926 sider
...agreed between the sender of the following message and the company that said company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery or for non-delivery of any unrepeated message whether happening by negligence of its servants or otherwise, beyond the amount... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1896 - 776 sider
...not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery or for the non-delivery of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence...otherwise, beyond the amount received for sending the same. The first defense set np against this action is this condition, which defendant insists was a part... | |
| 1888 - 556 sider
...company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery or non-delivery of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence...for sending the same: nor for mistakes or delays in th« transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery of any repeated message beyond fifty times tbe sum... | |
| 1888 - 564 sider
...shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission, or delivery, or for non-delivery of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence...beyond the amount received for sending the same." This is the usual stipulation printed on telegraph blanks, and was known to the plaintiff, and was... | |
| 1886 - 548 sider
...shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery of any unrepeated message, whether happening by negligence...beyond the amount received for sending the same," is delayed, and by reason of such delay the sender loses the sale of a horse, he may recover the amount... | |
| 1890 - 542 sider
...the company should not be liable for mistakes in the transmission thereof, "whether happening by the negligence of its servants or otherwise, beyond the amount received for sending the same." The plaintiff did not read this condition, nor know what it was, although he had sent and received... | |
| 1874 - 436 sider
...International Telegraph Co., 60 Me. 9. The blank contained a condition that "the company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery of any message, beyond the amount received by said company for sending the same." This was held unreasonable... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1873 - 612 sider
...be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or for non-delivery of any unrepeated message, beyond the amount received for sending the same ;...nor in any case for delays arising from unavoidable interruptions in the working of their lines, or for errors in cipher, or obscure messages. And this... | |
| 1874 - 752 sider
...between the sender of the following message and tliis company that the company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery, or for non-delivery of any message beyond the amount received by said company for sending the same ; send the following message... | |
| 1874 - 450 sider
...Company, to appear in 60 Maine (1870), it was held that a regulation that the company will "not be liable for mistakes or delays in the transmission or delivery or for nondelivery of any message beyond the amount received by said company for sending the same," would not protect the company... | |
| |