 In such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done, and In that sense controls the servant as he would control the contractor If he were present But the person who receives such orders Is not subject to the general orders...  Opinions, Workmen's Compensation Act - Side 29av Industrial Board of Illinois - 1916 - 222 siderUten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1914 - 1406 sider
...voluntary subject of a new sovereign, as the master sometimes was called in the old books. • * * But the person who receives such orders is not subject...to the general orders of the party who gives them. * • * There is not that degree of intimacy and generality in the subjection of one to the other which... | |
 | 1910 - 1206 sider
...all probability it was nothing more. Of course. In such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done, and In that sense controls...gives them. He does his own business In his own way, япД the orders which he receives simply point out to him the work which he or his master has undertaken... | |
 | 1909 - 1458 sider
...all probability it was nothing more. Of course, in such casos, the party who employs the contractor Indicates the work to be done, and in that sense controls...them. He does his own business in his own way, and the ordere which he receives simply point out to him the work which he or bis master has undertaken to... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1912 - 886 sider
...Driscoll v. Towle, 181 Mass. 416 (63 NE 922) : "In such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done, and in that sense controls...general orders of the party who gives them. He does their business in his own way, and tbe orders which he receives simply point out to him the work he... | |
 | 1921 - 660 sider
...sense controlled the service as he would have controlled the liveryman if he had been present. He did his own business in his own way, and the orders which he received from the undertaker simply point out to him the work to be done. Driscoll v. Towle, 181 Mass.,... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1914 - 724 sider
...him a voluntary subject of a new sovereign, as the master sometimes was called in the old books. * * But the person who receives such orders is not subject...to the general orders of the party who gives them. * * There is not that degree of intimacy and generality in the subjection of one to the other which... | |
 | 1916 - 1388 sider
...all probability it was nothing more. Of course, in such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done, and in that sense controls...own business in his own way, and the orders which ho receives simply point out to him the work which he or his master has undertaken to do. There is... | |
 | 1916 - 1358 sider
...all probability it was nothing more. Of course, in such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done, and in that sense controls...not subject to the general orders of the party who Rives them. He does his own business in his own way, and the orders which he receives simply point... | |
 | Louis Townsend Farr, Ohio. Circuit Court - 1921 - 656 sider
...sense controlled the service as he would have controlled the liveryman if he had been present. He did his own business in his own way, and the orders which he received from the undertaker simply point out to him the work to be done. Driscoll v. Toirle, 181 Mass.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1058 sider
...all probability it was nothing more. Of course, in such cases the party who employs the contractor indicates the work to be done and in that sense controls...were present. But the person who receives such orders ¡в not subject to the general orders ¿f the party who gives them. He does his own business in his... | |
| |
