Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

NOTE. In employing the method of Indeterminate Coefficients, the form of the given expression must determine what powers of the variable must be assumed. It is necessary and sufficient that the assumed equation, when simplified, shall have in the right member all the powers of x that are found in the left member.

If any powers of x occur in the right member that are not in the left member, the coefficients of these powers in the right member will vanish, so that in this case the method still applies; but if any powers of ≈ occur in the left member that are not in the right member, then the coefficients of these powers of x must be put equal to 0 in equating the coefficients of like powers of x; and this leads to absurd results. Thus, if it were assumed that

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

there would be in the simplified equation no term on the right corresponding to 2 on the left; so that, in equating the coefficients of like powers of x, 2, which is 2xo, would have to be put equal to 0xo; that is, 2 = 0, an absurdity.

Exercise 112.

Expand to four terms in ascending powers of x:

[blocks in formation]

331. Partial Fractions. To resolve a fraction into partial fractions is to express it as the sum of a number of fractions of which the respective denominators are the factors of the denominator of the given fraction. This process is the reverse of the process of adding fractions which have different denominators.

Resolution into partial fractions may be easily accomplished by the use of indeterminate coefficients.

In decomposing a given fraction into its simplest partial

fractions, it is important to determine what form the assumed fractions must have.

Since the given fraction is the sum of the required partial fractions, each assumed denominator must be a factor of the given denominator; moreover, all the factors of the given denominator must be taken as denominators of the assumed fractions.

Since the required partial fractions are to be in their simplest form incapable of further decomposition, the numerator of each required fraction must be assumed with reference to this condition. Thus, if the denominator is x" or (x+a)", the assumed fraction must be of the form Ax+ B Ax+ B

or

A
A
хт (x ± a)n ·

; for if it had the form

[blocks in formation]

it could be decomposed into two fractions, and the partial fractions would not be in the simplest form possible.

When all the monomial factors, and all the binomial factors, of the form x±a have been removed from the denominator of the given expression, there may remain quadratic factors which cannot be further resolved; and the numerators corresponding to these quadratic factors may each contain the first power of x, so that the assumed Ax+ B fractions must have either the form x2±ax+b'

or the

form

Ax+B
x2+b

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Since 3 + 1 = (x + 1)(x2 − x + 1), the denominators will be x + 1

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The denominators may be x, x2, x + 1, (x + 1)2.

[blocks in formation]

2

=

[ocr errors]

whence,

or

Ax (x + 1)2 + B(x + 1)2 + Сx2 (x + 1) + Dx2

= (A + C) x3 + (2 A + B + C + D) x2 + (A + 2 B) x + B ;

[blocks in formation]

Therefore,

3

4

[ocr errors]

+

[merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

CHAPTER XXV.

BINOMIAL THEOREM.

332. Binomial Theorem, Positive Integral Exponent. By successive multiplications we obtain the following identities: (a + b)2 = a2+2ab+b2;

(a + b)3 = a3 +3a2b+3ab2+b3 ;

(a + b)* = a*+4a3b+6a2b2+4 ab3 +b1.

The expressions on the right may be written in a form better adapted to show the law of their formation:

(a+b)2 = a2+2ab + 2:1 b3 ;

b2;

1.2

[blocks in formation]

NOTE. The dot between the Arabic figures means the same as the

sign X.

333. Let n represent the exponent of (a+b) in any one of these identities; then, in the expressions on the right, we observe that the following laws hold true:

I. The number of terms is n + 1.

II. The first term is a", and the exponent of a is one less in each succeeding term.

The first power of b occurs in the second term, the second power in the third term, and the exponent of b is one greater in each succeeding term.

The sum of the exponents of a and b in any term is n.

III. The coefficient of the first term is 1; of the second n(n−1); and so on.

term, n; of the third term,

1-2

334. Consider the coefficient of any term; the number of factors in the numerator is the same as the number of factors in the denominator, and the number of factors in each is the same as the exponent of b in that term; this exponent is one less than the number of the term.

335. Proof of the Theorem. To show that the laws of § 333 hold true when the exponent is any positive integer:

We know that the laws hold for the fourth power; suppose, for the moment, that they hold for the kth power. We shall then have

k(k-1) a-2b2

(a + b)* = a* + ka*-1b +

1.2

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Multiply both members of (1) by a+b; the result is

(a + b)*+1 = a*+1 + (k + 1) ab +

+

(k+1)k ak-162

1.2

[ocr errors][merged small]

In (1) put k+1 for k; this gives

(a + b)*+1 = ak+1 + (k + 1) a*b +

=

+

[ocr errors][merged small]

(k + 1)(k + 1 − 1) a2-122

1.2

(k + 1)(k + 1−1)(k+1−2) ak-2f3+.....

1.2.3

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

Equation (3) is seen to be the same as equation (2).

(3)

« ForrigeFortsett »