 The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim, and set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have.  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Side 489av Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1871Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1872 - 752 sider
...detense, counter claim or set off, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition." " Fourth. The defendant may set forth in his answer as • many grounds of defense, counter-claim, and set off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have. Each shall be distinctly stated in a separate... | |
 | 1848 - 718 sider
...repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence a* he may have. They are to be separately stated and may refer to the causes of action which... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1851 - 452 sider
...in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. (§ 129.) The Defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence as he shall have. They shall be separately stated, and may refer to the cause of action, which... | |
 | Kentucky - 1851 - 544 sider
...constituting a defense, counter-claim, or set-off, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition. 4. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many...distinctly stated in a separate paragraph, and numbered. The several defenses must rei'er to the causes of action which they are intended to answer, in a manner... | |
 | Kentucky - 1851 - 548 sider
...constituting a defense, counter-claim, or set-off, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition. 4. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many...distinctly stated in a separate paragraph, and numbered. The several defenses must refer to the causes of action which they are intended to answer, in a manner... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 sider
...new matter constituting a defence, counter-claim or set-off, without unnecessary repetition. SEC. 12. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence, counter-claim, or set-off, as he may have, whether they be such as have been heretofore denominated... | |
 | Colorado, Jefferson Territory - 1860 - 312 sider
...and concise language and without repetition. Grounds of defence to be set forth in answer. SEC. 209. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence as he may have. Each must be separately stated and numbered, and they must contain a denial... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1865 - 680 sider
...whether legal or equitable, as he shall nave" Stanton's Ky. Code, § 125, p. 85. The Ohio Code says : " The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counterclaim and set-off, as he may have, whether they be such as may have been heretofore Kramer v. Conger. denominated legal... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1870 - 852 sider
...brought by original process." The code of Indiana also provides that in suits brought in that State— " The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence, counter-claim, and set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have. Each shall bo distinctly... | |
 | Thomas Whitney Waterman - 1869 - 800 sider
...unsettled partnership demand would not have been allowed as a set-off. But the statutory rule now is, that the defendant may set forth in his answer as many...set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have (2 Rev. Sts. of Indiana, p. 39, § 56). And a set-off, as defined by the same statute, must consist... | |
| |
