 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - 1818 - 862 sider
...had occurred entitling him to relinquish the contract, said, that the act of taking possession was an implied agreement to pay interest ; for so absurd an agreement as that the purchaser was to receive the rents and profits to which he had no legal title, and the vendor was not to have... | |
 | John Eykyn Hovenden - 1825 - 734 sider
...purchase. - - - 126 119 The rule as to the rate of interest is not inflexible: but, generally speaking, the act of taking possession is an implied agreement to pay interest: 126, 127 120 to exempt a purchaser, it must, at all events, be shewn, that, the purchase money has... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery - 1827 - 572 sider
....,, . i of objections that from that day he will treat it, as if it was executed. . 4. . J to title. The act of taking possession is an implied agreement...purchaser is to receive the rents and profits, to which post; Vol. XV> 594. Margravine of Anspach v. Noel, 1 Madd. 310. Burnell v. Brown, 1 Jac. Sf Walh. 168.... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1899 - 750 sider
...contract will be executed, and therefore agrees that from that day he will treat it as if it was executed. The act of taking possession is an implied agreement...no legal title to the money, can never be implied." Sinks v. Rokeby, 2 Swanst. 288; Attorney- General v. Christ Church, Oxford, IS Sim. 21^.; Birch \.... | |
 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - 1836 - 474 sider
...625 ; Smith r. Skelton, Reg. Lib. B. 1799, fol. 807. (268) See Wightman v. Reside, 2 Des. 578, 582. implied agreement to pay interest; for so absurd an agreement as that the purchaser was to receive the rents and profits to which he had no legal title, and the vendor was not to have... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1841 - 922 sider
...will be executed ; and therefore agrees that from that day he will treat it as if it was executed. The act of taking possession is an implied agreement...profits, to which he has no legal title, and the vendor u not to have interest, as he has no legal title to the money, can never be implied. The purchaser... | |
 | Joseph Henry Dart - 1851 - 1234 sider
...had occurred entitling him to relinquish the contract, said, that the act of taking possession was an implied agreement to pay interest; for so absurd an agreement as that the purchaser was to receive the rents and' profits to yhich he had no legal title, and the vender was not to have... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1852 - 722 sider
...possession of the property as owner, without having paid the purchase money, he is bound to pay interest. The act of taking possession is an implied agreement to pay interest.:]: "We have here to take notice of a class of cases of not unfrequent occurrence in the country, growing... | |
 | 1857 - 664 sider
...was shewn under which lie might have safely taken, possession. (Bints v. Lord Rokeby, 2 Swanst. 222). The act of taking possession is an implied agreement...no legal title to the money, can never be implied. (Fludyer v. Cocker, 12 Ves. 27). " Where," said Sir J. Leach, VC, " there is no stipulation as to interest,... | |
 | Edward Burtenshaw Sugden - 1873 - 774 sider
...purchaser was ordered to pay interest at four per cent, from the day fixed for completing the contract.(r) The act of taking possession is an implied agreement...interest; for so absurd an agreement as that the purchaser was to receive the rents to which he had no legal title, and the vendor was not to have interest, as... | |
| |
The act of taking possession is an implied agreement to pay interest ; for so absurd an agreement, as that the purchaser is to receive the rents and profits, to [28] which he has no legal title, and the vendor is not to have interest, as he has no legal... 
