 Territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit...  American Law Reports Annotated - Side 2101921Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 sider
...of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe; and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe, for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 806 sider
...given by this act to a person suffering injury shall survive to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband...then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." US Comp. Stat. 1913, § 8665.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 sider
...in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employe, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe ; and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and if none, then the next of kin dependent... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1917 - 724 sider
...in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents or employees of such... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1917 - 780 sider
...in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband...such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's 244 US Opinion of the Court. parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee,... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1918 - 638 sider
...wrongful death of their employees engaged in that business for the benefit of three classes : "(1) The surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, (2) then of such employee's Rep.] April Term, 1917. parents; and, if none, (3) then of the next of... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 sider
...pertinent, reads as follows: "In case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband...of the next of kin dependent upon such employee." 35 US Stats, at Large, 65, C. 149; passed April 22, 1908. It is quite evident that much depends upon... | |
 | 1917 - 498 sider
...agents or employes, such employer shall be liable in damages "to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe; and, if none, then of such employe's parents ; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent... | |
 | 1920 - 496 sider
...of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then of such employe's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employe, but in such cases there shall be only one recovery for the same injury." This amendment merely... | |
| |
