California Legal Record, Volum 2F. A. Scofield & Company, 1879 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 79
Side 1
... March 30th , - -we have reported 193 decisions of our Supreme Court , with appropriate Statements of Facts , etc. , being every written opinion , and nearly every unwritten decision rendered - and absolutely every one rendered since the ...
... March 30th , - -we have reported 193 decisions of our Supreme Court , with appropriate Statements of Facts , etc. , being every written opinion , and nearly every unwritten decision rendered - and absolutely every one rendered since the ...
Side 6
... March 15th 1876 , to actions , and of its impairing the obligations of con- tracts . BY THE COURT . Reargument is ordered at the next November term , and attention of counsel directed to the point.s First Whether the provisions of the ...
... March 15th 1876 , to actions , and of its impairing the obligations of con- tracts . BY THE COURT . Reargument is ordered at the next November term , and attention of counsel directed to the point.s First Whether the provisions of the ...
Side 7
... March , 1876. The members The Doctor was consequently taken to the City Prison , whence he was immediately taken before the Supreme Court on a writ of habeas corpus , and admitted to bail pending the constitutionality of the contested ...
... March , 1876. The members The Doctor was consequently taken to the City Prison , whence he was immediately taken before the Supreme Court on a writ of habeas corpus , and admitted to bail pending the constitutionality of the contested ...
Side 8
... City , brought suit on March 21 , 1877 , for a division of certain barley , and the possession of a one - half share , as per a previous agreement . Upon trial , the findings show that on November Judgment 8 CALIFORNIA LEGAL RECORD .
... City , brought suit on March 21 , 1877 , for a division of certain barley , and the possession of a one - half share , as per a previous agreement . Upon trial , the findings show that on November Judgment 8 CALIFORNIA LEGAL RECORD .
Side 9
... March 14 , 1878 , and plaintiffs appeal from so much of the judgment as requires plaintiff to pay defendant $ 1001 52 before division , and from the order denying new trial . Appellants claim error in holding the note of $ 718,04 to be ...
... March 14 , 1878 , and plaintiffs appeal from so much of the judgment as requires plaintiff to pay defendant $ 1001 52 before division , and from the order denying new trial . Appellants claim error in holding the note of $ 718,04 to be ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
alleged amended amount appeal application attorney for plaintiff attorneys for defendant averment Bear river bill of exceptions Board California cause of action Central Pacific Railroad claim Code complaint Constitution contract conveyance corporation Court of Equity Decided decree deed defendant and appellant demurrer denied District Court entitled evidence execution fendant filed grant habeas corpus held indictment interest issued January Judge Judgment and order jurisdiction jury Justice Kern County Land Office Legislature lien March ment mortgage motion November November 20 nunc pro tunc October October 28 opinion order affirmed owner paid parties patent payment person Plaintiff and Appellant plaintiff and respondent possession premises proceedings promissory note purchase question Railroad record Remittitur forthwith rendered San Francisco Stanislaus County STATEMENT OF FACTS statute suit Supreme Court survey taxes term thereof tion trial United Unwritten Decision verdict writ