We confes that we are by no means thRd with these refections. Not to mention the impoffibility of perfuading perfons of tender, and perhaps not miftaken, opinions, to withhold what they deem it charity to beftow, it is by no means clear, that if we could reduce every one to this non-feasant difpofition, many milerable wretches would not perish for want of affitance. The giving of ins is by no means fetting up private judgment against a public law: for though it may be faid, that the legiflature have provided for the poor, yet daily experience fhews, that this provillon is ineffectual; at least it may, in many cafes, come too late: and a diftreffed object may perish before the proper officer can be called to his relief, or before it is determined to what legal ailiitance he has a juft title. Indeed, if the giving of money only could be restrained, it might effectually put an end to mendicancy as a trade, without doing injury to humanity. But it would be inhuman to deny food and rayment to the hungry and naked, from a perfuafion that they may be fupplied by a legal provifion, which, from various delays and impediments, may, perhaps, come too late for their neceffitics. The next regulation our Author propofes, is, that befides the Overfeers of the Poor, there be a general Superintendent over a certain number of parishes, as the Justices in feions fhall find. moft convenient. We cannot help thinking, however, that it would be too great a truit repofed in any one man, to give him the general fuperintendency over a number of parishes: but our limits will not allow us to enter farther into a difcuffion of this fubject, which is in truth of the highest importance. And whatever may be thought of the two particular regulations proposed by our Author, it must be allowed, that in the courfe of his animadverfions on prior schemes of this nature, he hath made many judicious reflections, which merit attention and regaid. We must not omit to inform the Reader, that in the concluding chapter, the Reverend Writer takes notice of the defects in other branches of the office of Juftices of the Peace, on which he animadverts in alphabetical order. It is obfervable, that under the title Game, he remarks, that One of the principal acts, viz. the 5 Ann. c. 14. is neither grammar nor commen fent, and is a difgrace to the ftatute back. Whether the ftatute deserves this fevere cenfure, we cannot take upon us to determine, having no opportunity of confulting it; but a criticilin of this kind, on any work whatever, may juftly be deemed fh and illiberal, and more cfpecially fo, when a folemn act e legifature is the fubject of its feverity. We may add, that that it comes with the greateft impropriety from the Reverend Writer, who has not fcrupled to reprehend Lord Hale, as fetting up private judgment against the public law.' GOTHAM: A Poem. Book II. By C. Churchill. 4to. 2s. 6d. Kearfly. TH HIS Bock is, in every respect, fuperior to the former: but the Author has employed, perhaps to no material purpofe, a confiderable part of it in apologizing for those defects in his poetry, which, in a Writer of fo much fpirit and genius, we have frequently had occafion to regret. Vain, certainly, must be his apologies with the fober and the ferious, fince he owns, that he cannot fpare time from the purfuit of pleasure, to polish or methodize his productions; and his affertion, that Nature Breaks the fence Of thofe tame drudges, Judgment, Tafe, and Serfe, is evidently ill-grounded; for Tafte and Judgment are founded on the principles of Nature, and owe their very exiftence to thofe ideas of comparative excellence and beauty which we borrow from her works. Of the occafional ftrokes he aims at the Reviewers, we forbear to take notice, out of deference to the public; concluding, that we have no right to take thofe liberties Mr. Churchill fo largely allows himfelf, or to fill our pages with impertinent recriminations. They will be much better employed in giving our Readers an idea of this nervous poem, fo far as the rhapfodical form of it may allow us; for Gotham feems to have neither plan nor defign, at least that we can discover. The progrefs of moral Reformation, and the gradual means of gaining over the Mind to Virtue, are juftly and ingenioufly defcribed: In her own full and perfect blaze of light, To 292 To conquer vice, of vice appears the friend, 'Gainft Vice they give their vote, nor know at first Thus the fhrewd Doctor, in the spleen-ftruck mind The Patient to thofe manly fports which bind And wonders on demand to find it health. The fubftance of the Author's Apology is contained in the following lines; which while we quote, Mr. Churchill muft own, that we are ready to do him juftice, without partiality, even to ourselves: Had I the pow'r, I could not have the time, And the poor flattern Muse is brought to bed Some, as no life appears, no pulses play Through the dull, dubious mafs, no breath makes way, Doubt, greatly doubt, till for a glass they call, Whether the child can be baptiz'd at all. E'en what my Masters please; Bards, mild, meek men, Something I do myfelf, and fomething too, If they can do it, leave for them to do. In In the fmall compafs of my careless page When SATIRE floops, unmindful of her ftate, Yet ftill eat on, and, dying call'd for more. The concluding fimile, in the above quotation, is equally deftitute of delicacy and propriety.-But the following imprecations contain fublime imagery, and moft powerful expreffion : Let War, with all his needy ruffian band, In pomp of horrour, ftalk thro' GOTHAM's land Her Merchants Bankrupts, and her Marts no more; Let Heav'n in vengeance arm all Nature's hoft, Unqueftion'd, their great Mafter's facred will. And, with deftruction big, o'er GOTHAM fweep; Let rains rush down, till FAITH with doubtful eye Let Peftilence in all her horrours rife; Let the Earth yawn, and, ere they've time to think, In the deep gulph let all my fubjects fink Before Before my eyes, whilft on the verge I reel; And die with thofe for whoin I with'd to live. This (but may Heav'n's more merciful decrees Born and bred flaves, that they, with proud mifrule, And, turn me, where I will, diftraction meets. The characters and reigns of the Stuarts in England, are not lefs happily than juftly defcribed. As a fpecimen let Charles the fecond ftand forth: From land to land for years compell'd to roam, Of Majefty unmindful, forc'd to fly, And was, fo clofe do cvil habits cling, Till crown'd, a beggar; and when crown'd, no King. Thofe grand and gen'ral pow'rs which Heav'n defigu'd Were loft, in ftorms of diffipation hurl'd, Kings of lefs wit might hunt the bubble fame; Dignity, |