 To this end, regard should be had, not so much to the nature and character of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Side 691av Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell, Samuel Ames - 1846 - 872 sider
...where the corporations have no private estate or interest in the grant. If the powers conferred be granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body, in its public and numicipal character; but if for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 sider
...confusion. In separating them, regard must be had to the object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...corporate body in its public, political or municipal BOARD or PABK Con M i»»i ONHRS r. COHHOIC COUNCIL or DITROIT. character. But if the grant was for... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1855 - 710 sider
...character of the various powers conferred, as the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes, exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public or municipal character. But if for purposes of private advantage, though the public may derive a common... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 sider
...powers, public and private, regard must be had to the, object of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively they belong to the corporate body in its public, polftical or municipal character; but if the grant was for purposes of private advantages and emolument,... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1862 - 486 sider
...of the private property of the city — as much so as the lands and houses within it. If powers are granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 sider
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 sider
...conferred, as to the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If FISHER v. NEW BERN. granted for public purposes, exclusively, they belong...political or municipal character. But if the grant was for the purpose of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom,... | |
 | 1892 - 554 sider
...of the various powers conferred as to the object and purpose of the Legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body in its public, political character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 914 sider
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 904 sider
...of the various powers conferred, as to the object and purpose of the legislature in conferring them. If granted for public purposes exclusively, they belong...and emolument, though the public may derive a common beneftt therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on... | |
| |
