Formulation of the 1990 Farm Bill: Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, First SessionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1990 |
Innhold
1 | |
9 | |
11 | |
21 | |
22 | |
27 | |
37 | |
39 | |
364 | |
381 | |
390 | |
446 | |
453 | |
482 | |
488 | |
495 | |
47 | |
51 | |
64 | |
115 | |
147 | |
173 | |
188 | |
196 | |
213 | |
223 | |
258 | |
298 | |
314 | |
342 | |
344 | |
497 | |
510 | |
530 | |
543 | |
549 | |
584 | |
685 | |
705 | |
713 | |
721 | |
733 | |
748 | |
761 | |
779 | |
823 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Formulation of the 1995 Farm Bill: The administration's view United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1995 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
1990 farm bill acreage acres agriculture American appreciate base believe Belle Glade budget cane cents per pound Chairman Clewiston Colorado COMBEST committee commodities competitive Congress Congressman consumers continue Corn Growers corn sweetener cost of production cotton cotton producers crop insurance deficiency payment domestic sugar economic estimates export Farm Bureau farm program farmers Federal flexibility Florida Food Security Food Security Act GATT Glades going Growers Association hearing herbicides HUCKABY hundredweight important income increase Jerry Huckaby land legislation loan rate marketing loan million Missouri negotiations percent plant prepared statement president problem profit quota reduced representing rice rice producers rural soybeans Spreckels Sugar Company STANGELAND STENHOLM subsidized sugar beet sugar industry sugar prices sugar producers Sugar Program talking target price tariff testimony Texas Thank trade U.S. sugar U.S. Sugar Program United USDA wheat world market yield
Populære avsnitt
Side 581 - ... (1) The bushel or pound per acre farm program payment yield for the 1986 and 1987 crop years shall be established in accordance with instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator and shall be the average of the farm program payment yields for the farm for the 1981 through 1985 crop years, excluding the year in which such yield was the highest and the year in which such yield was the lowest. (2) If no farm program payment yield for a crop was established for any of the 1981 through 1985 crop...
Side 282 - Deficiency payments were the difference between the target price and the higher of the loan rate or average market price.
Side 1043 - American cotton in world markets for such cotton for the threeyear period ending July 31 in the year in which the loan level is announced, except that if the loan rate so calculated is higher than the then current level of average world prices for American cotton of such quality, the...
Side 326 - I would be glad to try to answer any questions you might have. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr.
Side 1043 - ... carried out through the simultaneous purchase of cotton at the support price therefor and resale at a lower price or through loans under which the cotton would be redeemable by payment of a price therefor lower than the amount of the loan thereon...
Side 1137 - Mr. Chairman, that concludes my statement. I will do my best to respond to questions which you may have.
Side 981 - Deficiency payments would be based on crop year prices received by farmers. Advance payments would continue, and there would be a payment based on the difference between the target price and the higher of the 5-month average farm price or the basic loan rate.
Side 213 - I would like to thank the chairman and members of the committee for an opportunity to state our position.
Side 567 - Louisiana cooperative processor of sugarcane into raw sugar. I appear here today in my capacity as Chairman of the Legislative Committee of the American Sugar Cane League.
Side 1075 - We appreciate this opportunity to appear and express our views on this subject, and if there are any questions I will do my best to answer them. Senator SCHOEPPEL.